Dual-Task Specific Training or Conventional Physiotherapeutic Interventions, Which one is more Effective?

Nisaruddin, Muslim Khan, Saima Rahman, Iqra Muslim
{"title":"Dual-Task Specific Training or Conventional Physiotherapeutic Interventions, Which one is more Effective?","authors":"Nisaruddin, Muslim Khan, Saima Rahman, Iqra Muslim","doi":"10.52206/jsmc.2024.14.2.821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Physiotherapeutic interventions play a crucial role in motor re-learning and functional recovery for stroke patients with upper and lower limb motor impairments. Among these interventions, dual-task training (DTT) has demonstrated significant effectiveness in enhancing the functional recovery of stroke patients. Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of DTT and conventional physical therapy in ambulating right-hemiplegic stroke patients.Material and Methods: A randomized control trial (RCT) was conducted at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Saidu group of Teaching Hospital, 2nd March 2020 to 3rd August 2020. Chronic right-hemiplegic stroke patients meeting set inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups: the treatment group (TG) receiving DTT and the control group (CG) undergoing conventional physical therapy. DTT interventions included walking forward, backward, and sideways on a smooth surface while holding an 80-gram sandbag. The CG received conventional physiotherapy involving mat activities, strengthening, stretching exercises, and ambulation/gait training. Pre- and post-tests collected clinical data analyzed on SPSS 22 included spatial and temporal variables, 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), Time Up & Go Test (TUG), step length, cadence, cycle time, and stride length. Results: Out of 18 patients, each group had 50%, comprising 5 males (28%) and 4 females (22%). The mean age in CG was 57.20± 5.20, and in TG, it was 57.27± 6.10 years. Baseline clinical parameters were nearly identical between groups (P>0.05). Post-test scores revealed significant improvements in spatial and temporal gait variables, 10MWT score, cadence, step length, stride, and cycle time in TG compared to CG (P<0.05). Conclusion: Dual-task training and conventional physical therapy both significantly enhance the functional ability of right-hemiplegic patients across all gait temporal and spatial parameters. Keywords: Conventional physical therapy, Dual task training, Gait & ambulation, Stroke.","PeriodicalId":326561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2024.14.2.821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physiotherapeutic interventions play a crucial role in motor re-learning and functional recovery for stroke patients with upper and lower limb motor impairments. Among these interventions, dual-task training (DTT) has demonstrated significant effectiveness in enhancing the functional recovery of stroke patients. Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of DTT and conventional physical therapy in ambulating right-hemiplegic stroke patients.Material and Methods: A randomized control trial (RCT) was conducted at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Saidu group of Teaching Hospital, 2nd March 2020 to 3rd August 2020. Chronic right-hemiplegic stroke patients meeting set inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups: the treatment group (TG) receiving DTT and the control group (CG) undergoing conventional physical therapy. DTT interventions included walking forward, backward, and sideways on a smooth surface while holding an 80-gram sandbag. The CG received conventional physiotherapy involving mat activities, strengthening, stretching exercises, and ambulation/gait training. Pre- and post-tests collected clinical data analyzed on SPSS 22 included spatial and temporal variables, 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), Time Up & Go Test (TUG), step length, cadence, cycle time, and stride length. Results: Out of 18 patients, each group had 50%, comprising 5 males (28%) and 4 females (22%). The mean age in CG was 57.20± 5.20, and in TG, it was 57.27± 6.10 years. Baseline clinical parameters were nearly identical between groups (P>0.05). Post-test scores revealed significant improvements in spatial and temporal gait variables, 10MWT score, cadence, step length, stride, and cycle time in TG compared to CG (P<0.05). Conclusion: Dual-task training and conventional physical therapy both significantly enhance the functional ability of right-hemiplegic patients across all gait temporal and spatial parameters. Keywords: Conventional physical therapy, Dual task training, Gait & ambulation, Stroke.
双重任务专项训练与传统物理治疗干预,哪个更有效?
背景:物理治疗干预措施对有上下肢运动障碍的中风患者的运动再学习和功能恢复起着至关重要的作用。在这些干预措施中,双任务训练(DTT)在促进中风患者的功能恢复方面具有显著效果。研究目的本研究旨在比较双任务训练和传统物理疗法对右偏瘫脑卒中患者步行的有效性:这项随机对照试验于 2020 年 3 月 2 日至 2020 年 8 月 3 日在赛都教学医院康复医学科进行。符合既定纳入标准的慢性右侧偏瘫中风患者被随机分配到两组:治疗组(TG)接受 DTT,对照组(CG)接受常规物理治疗。DTT 的干预措施包括手持 80 克重的沙袋,在光滑的地面上向前、向后和向两侧行走。对照组(CG)则接受常规物理治疗,包括垫上运动、强化、伸展运动和行走/步态训练。通过 SPSS 22 分析收集的前测和后测临床数据包括空间和时间变量、10 米步行测试(10MWT)、步行时间测试(TUG)、步长、步幅、周期时间和步长。结果显示在 18 名患者中,每组 50%,包括 5 名男性(28%)和 4 名女性(22%)。CG的平均年龄为(57.20± 5.20)岁,TG的平均年龄为(57.27± 6.10)岁。两组的基线临床参数几乎相同(P>0.05)。测试后的评分显示,TG 与 CG 相比,在空间和时间步态变量、10MWT 评分、步幅、步长、步幅和周期时间方面均有明显改善(P<0.05)。结论双任务训练和传统物理疗法都能显著提高右侧偏瘫患者在所有步态时空参数方面的功能能力。关键词传统物理治疗 双任务训练 步态与行走 中风
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信