Can Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI be Used to Differentiate Hepatic Hemangioma from Other Lesions in Early Infancy?

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Dan Halevy, Blayne A. Sayed, Furqan Shaikh, Iram Siddiqui, G. Chavhan
{"title":"Can Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI be Used to Differentiate Hepatic Hemangioma from Other Lesions in Early Infancy?","authors":"Dan Halevy, Blayne A. Sayed, Furqan Shaikh, Iram Siddiqui, G. Chavhan","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1785208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Confident diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma on imaging can avoid biopsy in early infancy and helps guide conservative management.\n Purpose This article aims to determine if dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to differentiate liver hemangioma from other lesions in infants ≤ 100 days and to determine association of MRI features with hepatic lesions.\n Methods MRI performed for liver lesions were retrospectively reviewed to note imaging characteristics and the MRI diagnosis. Final diagnosis was assigned based on pathology in available cases and by corroborative standard of reference including overall clinical features, lab findings, and follow-up.\n Results Of 30 infants (18 boys, 12 girls; average age 42.2 days) included, 18 had solitary and 12 had multifocal lesions. Diagnoses in total 33 lesions included hemangiomas (23), hepatoblastoma (6), arteriovenous malformation (2), neuroblastoma metastases (1), and infarction (1). MRI and final diagnosis matched in 94% lesions with almost perfect agreement (kappa 0.86) for reader 1, and matched in 88% lesions with substantial agreement (kappa 0.71) for reader 2. Interobserver agreement for MRI diagnosis was substantial (kappa 0.62). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MRI in differentiating hemangioma from other lesions were 100, 90, 96, 100, and 97%, respectively. Centripetal (16/23) or flash (5/23) filling were only seen with hemangioma. There was no significant difference in alpha-fetoprotein elevation (p 0.08), average size (p 0.35), multifocality (p 0.38), and intralesional hemorrhage (p 1) between hemangioma and hepatoblastoma.\n Conclusion Centripetal filling on dynamic imaging and absence of washout are characteristic MRI features of hepatic hemangioma that can help to differentiate it from other lesions in early infancy.","PeriodicalId":51597,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Confident diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma on imaging can avoid biopsy in early infancy and helps guide conservative management. Purpose This article aims to determine if dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to differentiate liver hemangioma from other lesions in infants ≤ 100 days and to determine association of MRI features with hepatic lesions. Methods MRI performed for liver lesions were retrospectively reviewed to note imaging characteristics and the MRI diagnosis. Final diagnosis was assigned based on pathology in available cases and by corroborative standard of reference including overall clinical features, lab findings, and follow-up. Results Of 30 infants (18 boys, 12 girls; average age 42.2 days) included, 18 had solitary and 12 had multifocal lesions. Diagnoses in total 33 lesions included hemangiomas (23), hepatoblastoma (6), arteriovenous malformation (2), neuroblastoma metastases (1), and infarction (1). MRI and final diagnosis matched in 94% lesions with almost perfect agreement (kappa 0.86) for reader 1, and matched in 88% lesions with substantial agreement (kappa 0.71) for reader 2. Interobserver agreement for MRI diagnosis was substantial (kappa 0.62). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MRI in differentiating hemangioma from other lesions were 100, 90, 96, 100, and 97%, respectively. Centripetal (16/23) or flash (5/23) filling were only seen with hemangioma. There was no significant difference in alpha-fetoprotein elevation (p 0.08), average size (p 0.35), multifocality (p 0.38), and intralesional hemorrhage (p 1) between hemangioma and hepatoblastoma. Conclusion Centripetal filling on dynamic imaging and absence of washout are characteristic MRI features of hepatic hemangioma that can help to differentiate it from other lesions in early infancy.
动态对比增强核磁共振成像(Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI)可用于区分婴儿早期肝血管瘤和其他病变吗?
背景 通过影像学确诊肝血管瘤可避免在婴儿早期进行活检,并有助于指导保守治疗。目的 本文旨在确定动态对比增强磁共振成像(MRI)是否可用于区分 100 天以下婴儿的肝血管瘤和其他病变,并确定 MRI 特征与肝脏病变的关联。方法 对肝脏病变的核磁共振成像进行回顾性审查,以记录成像特征和核磁共振成像诊断。根据现有病例的病理结果以及包括整体临床特征、实验室检查结果和随访在内的确证参考标准做出最终诊断。结果 在纳入的 30 名婴儿(18 名男孩,12 名女孩;平均年龄 42.2 天)中,18 名患有单发性病变,12 名患有多灶性病变。总共 33 个病灶的诊断包括血管瘤(23 个)、肝母细胞瘤(6 个)、动静脉畸形(2 个)、神经母细胞瘤转移(1 个)和脑梗塞(1 个)。94%的病灶 MRI 与最终诊断结果吻合,阅读者 1 几乎完全吻合(kappa 0.86),阅读者 2 88%的病灶 MRI 与最终诊断结果基本吻合(kappa 0.71)。核磁共振成像诊断的观察者间一致性很高(kappa 0.62)。核磁共振成像在区分血管瘤和其他病变方面的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为 100%、90%、96%、100% 和 97%。向心性填充(16/23)或闪光填充(5/23)仅见于血管瘤。血管瘤和肝母细胞瘤在甲胎蛋白升高(P 0.08)、平均大小(P 0.35)、多发性(P 0.38)和区内出血(P 1)方面没有明显差异。结论 动态成像上的向心性充盈和无冲刷是肝血管瘤的 MRI 特征,有助于在婴儿早期将其与其他病变区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging
Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信