Classifications of Offline Shopping Trends and Patterns with Machine Learning Algorithms

Muta'alimah Muta'alimah, Cindy Kirana Zarry, Atha Kurniawan, Hauriya Hasysya, Muhammad Farhan Firas, Nurin Nadhirah
{"title":"Classifications of Offline Shopping Trends and Patterns with Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"Muta'alimah Muta'alimah, Cindy Kirana Zarry, Atha Kurniawan, Hauriya Hasysya, Muhammad Farhan Firas, Nurin Nadhirah","doi":"10.57152/predatecs.v2i1.1099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advancements in technology have made online shopping popular among many. However, the use of offline marketing models is still considered a profitable and important way of business development. This can be seen in the 2022 Association of Retail Entrepreneurs of Indonesia (APRINDO), which states that  60% of Indonesians shop offline, and in 2023, more than 75% of continental European consumers will prefer to shop offline. This is because many benefits can be achieved through offline marketing that cannot be obtained from online marketing. Therefore, classification of patterns and trends is performed to compare the results of the algorithms under study. Furthermore, this research was conducted to help offline retailers understand consumption patterns and trends that affect purchases. The algorithms analyzed in this study are K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Naive Bayes, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). As a result, the ANN algorithm obtained the highest confusion matrix results with an Accuracy value of 96.38%, Precision of 100.00%, and Recall of 100.00%. Meanwhile, when the Naive Bayes algorithm was used, the lowest Accuracy value was 57.39%, the Precision value was 57.86%, and when the K-NN algorithm was used, the Recall value was as low as 92.00%. These results indicate that the ANN algorithm is better at classifying offline shopping image data than the K-NN and Naive Bayes algorithms","PeriodicalId":516904,"journal":{"name":"Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57152/predatecs.v2i1.1099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advancements in technology have made online shopping popular among many. However, the use of offline marketing models is still considered a profitable and important way of business development. This can be seen in the 2022 Association of Retail Entrepreneurs of Indonesia (APRINDO), which states that  60% of Indonesians shop offline, and in 2023, more than 75% of continental European consumers will prefer to shop offline. This is because many benefits can be achieved through offline marketing that cannot be obtained from online marketing. Therefore, classification of patterns and trends is performed to compare the results of the algorithms under study. Furthermore, this research was conducted to help offline retailers understand consumption patterns and trends that affect purchases. The algorithms analyzed in this study are K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Naive Bayes, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). As a result, the ANN algorithm obtained the highest confusion matrix results with an Accuracy value of 96.38%, Precision of 100.00%, and Recall of 100.00%. Meanwhile, when the Naive Bayes algorithm was used, the lowest Accuracy value was 57.39%, the Precision value was 57.86%, and when the K-NN algorithm was used, the Recall value was as low as 92.00%. These results indicate that the ANN algorithm is better at classifying offline shopping image data than the K-NN and Naive Bayes algorithms
利用机器学习算法对线下购物趋势和模式进行分类
技术的进步使网上购物在许多人中流行起来。然而,线下营销模式仍被认为是一种有利可图的重要商业发展方式。2022 年印尼零售企业家协会(APRINDO)的数据表明,60% 的印尼人在线下购物,而在 2023 年,超过 75% 的欧洲大陆消费者将更愿意在线下购物。这是因为通过线下营销可以获得许多线上营销无法获得的好处。因此,要对模式和趋势进行分类,以比较所研究算法的结果。此外,这项研究还有助于线下零售商了解影响购买的消费模式和趋势。本研究分析的算法包括 K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN)、Naive Bayes 和人工神经网络 (ANN)。结果,人工神经网络算法获得了最高的混淆矩阵结果,准确率为 96.38%,精确率为 100.00%,召回率为 100.00%。与此同时,当使用 Naive Bayes 算法时,准确度值最低,为 57.39%,精确度值为 57.86%,而当使用 K-NN 算法时,召回值低至 92.00%。这些结果表明,与 K-NN 算法和 Naive Bayes 算法相比,ANN 算法能更好地对离线购物图像数据进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信