Leaving emergency departments without completing treatment among First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Alberta: a mixed-methods study

Patrick McLane, L. Bill, Bonnie Healy, Cheryl M. Barnabe, Tessy Big Plume, A. Bird, Amy Colquhoun, Brian R. Holroyd, Kris Janvier, E. Louis, Katherine Rittenbach, Kimberley D. Curtin, K. Fitzpatrick, L. Mackey, Davis MacLean, R. Rosychuk
{"title":"Leaving emergency departments without completing treatment among First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Alberta: a mixed-methods study","authors":"Patrick McLane, L. Bill, Bonnie Healy, Cheryl M. Barnabe, Tessy Big Plume, A. Bird, Amy Colquhoun, Brian R. Holroyd, Kris Janvier, E. Louis, Katherine Rittenbach, Kimberley D. Curtin, K. Fitzpatrick, L. Mackey, Davis MacLean, R. Rosychuk","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.231019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Our previous research showed that, in Alberta, Canada, a higher proportion of visits to emergency departments and urgent care centres by First Nations patients ended in the patient leaving without being seen or against medical advice, compared with visits by non–First Nations patients. We sought to analyze whether these differences persisted after controlling for patient demographic and visit characteristics, and to explore reasons for leaving care. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study, including a population-based retrospective cohort study for the period of April 2012 to March 2017 using provincial administrative data. We used multivariable logistic regression models to control for demographics, visit characteristics, and facility types. We evaluated models for subgroups of visits with pre-selected illnesses. We also conducted qualitative, in-person sharing circles, a focus group, and 1-on-1 telephone interviews with health directors, emergency care providers, and First Nations patients from 2019 to 2022, during which we reviewed the quantitative results of the cohort study and asked participants to comment on them. We descriptively categorized qualitative data related to reasons that First Nations patients leave care. Results: Our quantitative analysis included 11 686 287 emergency department visits, of which 1 099 424 (9.4%) were by First Nations patients. Visits by First Nations patients were more likely to end with them leaving without being seen or against medical advice than those by non–First Nations patients (odds ratio 1.96, 95% confidence interval 1.94–1.98). Factors such as diagnosis, visit acuity, geography, or patient demographics other than First Nations status did not explain this finding. First Nations status was associated with greater odds of leaving without being seen or against medical advice in 9 of 10 disease categories or specific diagnoses. In our qualitative analysis, 64 participants discussed First Nations patients’ experiences of racism, stereotyping, communication issues, transportation barriers, long waits, and being made to wait longer than others as reasons for leaving. Interpretation: Emergency department visits by First Nations patients were more likely to end with them leaving without being seen or against medical advice than those by non–First Nations patients. As leaving early may delay needed care or interfere with continuity of care, providers and departments should work with local First Nations to develop and adopt strategies to retain First Nations patients in care.","PeriodicalId":10359,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal","volume":"118 28","pages":"E510 - E523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.231019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our previous research showed that, in Alberta, Canada, a higher proportion of visits to emergency departments and urgent care centres by First Nations patients ended in the patient leaving without being seen or against medical advice, compared with visits by non–First Nations patients. We sought to analyze whether these differences persisted after controlling for patient demographic and visit characteristics, and to explore reasons for leaving care. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study, including a population-based retrospective cohort study for the period of April 2012 to March 2017 using provincial administrative data. We used multivariable logistic regression models to control for demographics, visit characteristics, and facility types. We evaluated models for subgroups of visits with pre-selected illnesses. We also conducted qualitative, in-person sharing circles, a focus group, and 1-on-1 telephone interviews with health directors, emergency care providers, and First Nations patients from 2019 to 2022, during which we reviewed the quantitative results of the cohort study and asked participants to comment on them. We descriptively categorized qualitative data related to reasons that First Nations patients leave care. Results: Our quantitative analysis included 11 686 287 emergency department visits, of which 1 099 424 (9.4%) were by First Nations patients. Visits by First Nations patients were more likely to end with them leaving without being seen or against medical advice than those by non–First Nations patients (odds ratio 1.96, 95% confidence interval 1.94–1.98). Factors such as diagnosis, visit acuity, geography, or patient demographics other than First Nations status did not explain this finding. First Nations status was associated with greater odds of leaving without being seen or against medical advice in 9 of 10 disease categories or specific diagnoses. In our qualitative analysis, 64 participants discussed First Nations patients’ experiences of racism, stereotyping, communication issues, transportation barriers, long waits, and being made to wait longer than others as reasons for leaving. Interpretation: Emergency department visits by First Nations patients were more likely to end with them leaving without being seen or against medical advice than those by non–First Nations patients. As leaving early may delay needed care or interfere with continuity of care, providers and departments should work with local First Nations to develop and adopt strategies to retain First Nations patients in care.
艾伯塔省原住民和非原住民患者在未完成治疗的情况下离开急诊科:一项混合方法研究
背景:我们之前的研究表明,在加拿大艾伯塔省,与非原住民患者相比,原住民患者到急诊科和紧急护理中心就诊时,有更高比例的患者没有得到诊治或不听医嘱就离开了。我们试图分析在控制了患者的人口统计学特征和就诊特征后,这些差异是否仍然存在,并探讨离开医疗机构的原因。研究方法我们采用混合方法进行了一项研究,其中包括一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,研究时间为 2012 年 4 月至 2017 年 3 月,使用的是省级行政数据。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型来控制人口统计学、就诊特征和设施类型。我们评估了预选疾病就诊亚组的模型。从 2019 年到 2022 年,我们还与卫生主管、急诊服务提供者和原住民患者开展了定性的面对面分享会、焦点小组和一对一电话访谈,在此期间,我们回顾了队列研究的定量结果,并请参与者发表评论。我们对与原住民患者离开医疗机构的原因有关的定性数据进行了描述性分类。研究结果我们的定量分析包括 11 686 287 次急诊就诊,其中原住民患者就诊 1 099 424 次(9.4%)。与非原住民患者相比,原住民患者更有可能在未得到诊治或不听医嘱的情况下离开急诊室(几率比 1.96,95% 置信区间 1.94-1.98)。除原住民身份外,诊断、就诊敏锐度、地理位置或患者人口统计等因素都无法解释这一结果。在 10 种疾病类别或特定诊断中,原住民身份与 9 种疾病类别或特定诊断中未就诊或不听医嘱而离开的几率较大相关。在我们的定性分析中,64 名参与者讨论了原住民患者离开的原因,包括种族主义、刻板印象、沟通问题、交通障碍、长时间等待以及比其他人等待更长的时间。解读:与非原住民患者相比,原住民患者在急诊室就诊时更有可能在没有得到诊治或违背医嘱的情况下离开。由于过早离开可能会耽误所需的治疗或影响治疗的连续性,医疗服务提供者和部门应与当地原住民合作,制定并采取相关策略,留住原住民病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信