Building physician wellness into the culture: evaluating a family physician well-being programme using the physician wellness inventory.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tarin L Clay, Natabhona M. Mabachi, Elisabeth F. Callen
{"title":"Building physician wellness into the culture: evaluating a family physician well-being programme using the physician wellness inventory.","authors":"Tarin L Clay, Natabhona M. Mabachi, Elisabeth F. Callen","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nFamily physicians have a higher incidence of burnout, dissatisfaction, and disengagement compared to other medical specialties. Addressing burnout on the individual and systemic level is important to promoting wellness and preventing deleterious effects on physicians and patients. We used the Physician Wellness Inventory (PWI) to assess the effects of a wellness programme designed to equip family physicians with skills to address burnout.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe PWI is a fourteen-item 5-point Likert scale broken down into 3 scores; (i) career purpose, (ii) cognitive flexibility, and (iii) distress. The PWI was distributed to a cohort of n = 111 family physician scholars at 3 time points: January 2021, May-June 2021, and October 2021. The response rate was 96.4% at baseline, and 72.1% overall. Demographic information was collected to assess differences. The survey was distributed online through Qualtrics (Provo, UT).\n\n\nRESULTS\nCognitive Flexibility scores at the endpoint were higher for POC scholars than white scholars (P = 0.024). Distress scores for all groups decreased over time. Female scholars were more nervous, and anxious at the start than male scholars (P = 0.012), which decreased over time (P = 0.022). New career scholars were more likely than later career scholars to be distressed (P = 0.007), but both groups' distress decreased over time (P = 0.003). Later career scholars' feelings of being bothered by little interest or pleasure in doing things decreased more than new career scholars (endpoint: P = 0.022; overall: P = 0.023).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe wellness programme shows improvement in PWI scores, indicating the programme content should be evaluated further for system level improvements.","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Family physicians have a higher incidence of burnout, dissatisfaction, and disengagement compared to other medical specialties. Addressing burnout on the individual and systemic level is important to promoting wellness and preventing deleterious effects on physicians and patients. We used the Physician Wellness Inventory (PWI) to assess the effects of a wellness programme designed to equip family physicians with skills to address burnout. METHODS The PWI is a fourteen-item 5-point Likert scale broken down into 3 scores; (i) career purpose, (ii) cognitive flexibility, and (iii) distress. The PWI was distributed to a cohort of n = 111 family physician scholars at 3 time points: January 2021, May-June 2021, and October 2021. The response rate was 96.4% at baseline, and 72.1% overall. Demographic information was collected to assess differences. The survey was distributed online through Qualtrics (Provo, UT). RESULTS Cognitive Flexibility scores at the endpoint were higher for POC scholars than white scholars (P = 0.024). Distress scores for all groups decreased over time. Female scholars were more nervous, and anxious at the start than male scholars (P = 0.012), which decreased over time (P = 0.022). New career scholars were more likely than later career scholars to be distressed (P = 0.007), but both groups' distress decreased over time (P = 0.003). Later career scholars' feelings of being bothered by little interest or pleasure in doing things decreased more than new career scholars (endpoint: P = 0.022; overall: P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS The wellness programme shows improvement in PWI scores, indicating the programme content should be evaluated further for system level improvements.
将医生健康融入文化:使用医生健康清单评估家庭医生健康计划。
目的与其他医疗专业相比,家庭医生的职业倦怠、不满和脱离的发生率较高。从个人和系统层面解决职业倦怠问题对于促进健康、防止对医生和患者产生有害影响非常重要。我们使用了医生健康量表(PWI)来评估一项旨在使家庭医生掌握解决职业倦怠问题的技能的健康计划的效果。PWI 在 3 个时间点发放给 n = 111 名家庭医生学者:2021 年 1 月、2021 年 5-6 月和 2021 年 10 月。基线回复率为 96.4%,总体回复率为 72.1%。收集了人口统计学信息以评估差异。调查通过 Qualtrics (Provo, UT) 在线发布。结果认知灵活性得分在终点时,太平洋岛屿族裔学者高于白人学者(P = 0.024)。随着时间的推移,所有群体的苦恼得分都有所下降。女性学者在开始时比男性学者更加紧张和焦虑(P = 0.012),随着时间的推移,这种紧张和焦虑有所减轻(P = 0.022)。初入职场的学者比后来入职场的学者更容易感到苦恼(P = 0.007),但随着时间的推移,两组学者的苦恼都有所减轻(P = 0.003)。结论:健康计划显示,PWI 分数有所改善,表明应进一步评估该计划的内容,以在系统层面上加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信