The Effectiveness of Aligners in the Treatment of Anterior Open Bite in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Oral Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.3390/oral4020014
Tainá Iunes, Afonso Pinhão-Ferreira, V. Urzal
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Aligners in the Treatment of Anterior Open Bite in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal","authors":"Tainá Iunes, Afonso Pinhão-Ferreira, V. Urzal","doi":"10.3390/oral4020014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An anterior open bite is a dental malocclusion, the diagnosis of which is fundamental for its treatment. With the evolution of artificial intelligence, it is possible to treat it through the Invisalign G4 protocol, depending on the degree of severity. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review, based on the PICO strategy, to evaluate the effectiveness of aligners and accessory devices in adult patients with anterior open bites. The search was carried out in the following databases for publications over the last ten years: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and LILACS. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies evaluating adults with anterior open bites (overbites < 0 mm) and orthodontic studies with aligners. The exclusion criteria were studies of cases with dentofacial deformities, previous orthodontic treatment, history of surgery/trauma, or systemic diseases that affect craniofacial growth, as well as animal studies, reviews, and clinical cases. The selection was carried out separately by two researchers. In the four databases, 108 articles were obtained. By reviewing the titles and abstracts and applying the exclusion criteria, 91 articles were eliminated. The seven resulting articles were submitted to the inclusion criteria, two of which were excluded due to their lack of patients presenting an open bite and the absence of aligner treatment. According to the PRISMA method, five studies were selected. The collected data showed an increase in overbites with the use of aligners. The bias assessment was performed with the ROBINS-I tool, indicating a moderate risk of bias. The included studies demonstrated the effectiveness of aligners in the treatment of adults with mild or moderate open bites; however, due to the lack of scientific evidence, it is necessary to carry out randomized studies with the same standardized variables.","PeriodicalId":19685,"journal":{"name":"Oral","volume":"20 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/oral4020014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An anterior open bite is a dental malocclusion, the diagnosis of which is fundamental for its treatment. With the evolution of artificial intelligence, it is possible to treat it through the Invisalign G4 protocol, depending on the degree of severity. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review, based on the PICO strategy, to evaluate the effectiveness of aligners and accessory devices in adult patients with anterior open bites. The search was carried out in the following databases for publications over the last ten years: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and LILACS. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies evaluating adults with anterior open bites (overbites < 0 mm) and orthodontic studies with aligners. The exclusion criteria were studies of cases with dentofacial deformities, previous orthodontic treatment, history of surgery/trauma, or systemic diseases that affect craniofacial growth, as well as animal studies, reviews, and clinical cases. The selection was carried out separately by two researchers. In the four databases, 108 articles were obtained. By reviewing the titles and abstracts and applying the exclusion criteria, 91 articles were eliminated. The seven resulting articles were submitted to the inclusion criteria, two of which were excluded due to their lack of patients presenting an open bite and the absence of aligner treatment. According to the PRISMA method, five studies were selected. The collected data showed an increase in overbites with the use of aligners. The bias assessment was performed with the ROBINS-I tool, indicating a moderate risk of bias. The included studies demonstrated the effectiveness of aligners in the treatment of adults with mild or moderate open bites; however, due to the lack of scientific evidence, it is necessary to carry out randomized studies with the same standardized variables.
矫治器治疗成人前牙开放性咬合的有效性:系统回顾与批判性评估
前牙开合咬合是一种牙齿畸形,其诊断是治疗的基础。随着人工智能的发展,可以根据其严重程度,通过隐适美 G4 方案进行治疗。本研究的目的是根据PICO策略进行系统性回顾,评估矫治器和附属装置对前牙开合咬合成年患者的有效性。我们在以下数据库中搜索了过去十年间的出版物:PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 和 LILACS。纳入标准是评估成人前方开放性咬合(咬合过度小于 0 毫米)的临床研究和使用矫治器的正畸研究。排除标准为颌面部畸形、既往接受过正畸治疗、手术/外伤史或影响颅面生长的全身性疾病的病例研究,以及动物研究、综述和临床病例。筛选工作由两名研究人员分别进行。在四个数据库中,共获得 108 篇文章。通过审查标题和摘要并应用排除标准,共剔除了 91 篇文章。最终有7篇文章符合纳入标准,其中两篇因缺乏开放性咬合患者和未使用矫治器治疗而被排除。根据PRISMA方法,选出了五项研究。收集到的数据显示,使用矫治器后,咬合过度的情况有所增加。使用 ROBINS-I 工具进行了偏倚评估,结果显示偏倚风险适中。所纳入的研究表明,矫治器在治疗成人轻度或中度开放性咬合方面具有疗效;然而,由于缺乏科学证据,有必要进行具有相同标准化变量的随机研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信