Linguistic features in narrative and opinion genres and their relations to writing quality in fourth grade writing

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jiali Wang, Young-Suk Grace Kim, Minkyung Cho
{"title":"Linguistic features in narrative and opinion genres and their relations to writing quality in fourth grade writing","authors":"Jiali Wang,&nbsp;Young-Suk Grace Kim,&nbsp;Minkyung Cho","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We examined linguistic features in fourth graders' narrative and opinion writing and their relations to writing quality. We analysed narrative and opinion essays in terms of lexical sophistication and diversity as well as syntactic complexity, syntactic accuracy, and morphological complexity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were from English-speaking students in Grade 4 (<i>N</i> = 129; 50% female) in the United States, majority of whom were from low socioeconomic status background. Paired <i>t</i> tests were used to analyse differences of linguistic features between the two genres. Hierarchical regression models were run to examine how language features are related to writing quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Words in the narrative task were more diverse and included more diverse verbal inflectional morphemes than those in the opinion task; syntactic complexity was significantly greater in the opinion genre, manifested by longer T-units and the more frequent use of adverbial and relative clauses. Approximately 80% of T-units were grammatical and 20% were ungrammatical. Syntactic accuracy and verbal morphological complexity of words were positively related to writing quality in the narrative task. Additionally, syntactic complexity measured by clauses per T-unit, verbal and nominal morphological complexity of words were uniquely related to writing quality in the opinion genre.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings highlight the limited extent to which Grade 4 students use complex syntax in their writing. The study also supports the critical role of linguistic features in writing quality and shows both similarities and differences in language use in two important writing genres, narrative and opinion, in elementary grades.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"47 2","pages":"220-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We examined linguistic features in fourth graders' narrative and opinion writing and their relations to writing quality. We analysed narrative and opinion essays in terms of lexical sophistication and diversity as well as syntactic complexity, syntactic accuracy, and morphological complexity.

Methods

Data were from English-speaking students in Grade 4 (N = 129; 50% female) in the United States, majority of whom were from low socioeconomic status background. Paired t tests were used to analyse differences of linguistic features between the two genres. Hierarchical regression models were run to examine how language features are related to writing quality.

Results

Words in the narrative task were more diverse and included more diverse verbal inflectional morphemes than those in the opinion task; syntactic complexity was significantly greater in the opinion genre, manifested by longer T-units and the more frequent use of adverbial and relative clauses. Approximately 80% of T-units were grammatical and 20% were ungrammatical. Syntactic accuracy and verbal morphological complexity of words were positively related to writing quality in the narrative task. Additionally, syntactic complexity measured by clauses per T-unit, verbal and nominal morphological complexity of words were uniquely related to writing quality in the opinion genre.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the limited extent to which Grade 4 students use complex syntax in their writing. The study also supports the critical role of linguistic features in writing quality and shows both similarities and differences in language use in two important writing genres, narrative and opinion, in elementary grades.

四年级作文中记叙文和议论文体裁的语言特点及其与写作质量的关系
我们研究了四年级学生记叙文和议论文的语言特点及其与写作质量的关系。我们从词汇的复杂性和多样性、句法的复杂性、句法的准确性和词形的复杂性等方面对记叙文和议论文进行了分析。数据来自美国四年级的英语学生(人数=129;女生占50%),其中大部分来自社会经济地位较低的背景。采用配对 t 检验分析两种体裁之间语言特征的差异。叙事任务中的词语比观点任务中的词语更多样化,包含更多不同的动词变位语素;观点体裁的句法复杂性明显更高,表现为T-单位更长,副词和相对从句的使用更频繁。大约 80% 的 T 单元符合语法,20% 不符合语法。在叙事任务中,句法的准确性和词语形态的复杂性与写作质量呈正相关。此外,以每 T 单元分句衡量的句法复杂性、词语的动词和名词形态复杂性与观点体裁的写作质量有独特的关系。研究还支持语言特点在写作质量中的关键作用,并显示了小学叙事和观点这两种重要写作体裁在语言使用上的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Reading provides an international forum for researchers into literacy. It is a refereed journal, principally devoted to reports of empirical studies in reading and related fields, and to informed reviews of relevant literature. The journal welcomes papers researching issues related to the learning, teaching and use of literacy in a variety of contexts; papers on the history and development of literacy; papers about policy and strategy for literacy as related to children and adults. Journal of Research in Reading encourages papers within any research paradigm and from researchers in any relevant field such as anthropology, cultural studies, education, history of education, language and linguistics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信