How is range of motion of the fingers measured in hand therapy practice? A survey study

Zeal Kadakia, Sandra VanderKaay, Ayse Kuspinar, Tara Packham
{"title":"How is range of motion of the fingers measured in hand therapy practice? A survey study","authors":"Zeal Kadakia, Sandra VanderKaay, Ayse Kuspinar, Tara Packham","doi":"10.1177/17589983241237780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of techniques for measuring finger range of motion (ROM) are available for hand therapist use, however, there is no clear description of which finger ROM methods are preferred in practice. This study explored the preferred measurement techniques, the factors influencing clinical decision-making, and the clinical reasoning processes employed when faced with practice-based measurement scenarios. This was a cross-sectional online survey study of hand therapists and American or Canadian Society of Hand Therapists members. Quantitative methods were employed for participant demographics and categorical clinical questions about practice patterns. Qualitative descriptive questions and vignettes were analysed using inductive and deductive content analysis, respectively. Four hundred and eighty-one responses were included, representing hand therapists with a median age of 51 years and median experience of 19 years. Participants preferred measuring individual joints with a goniometer ( N = 210, 44%) for perceived utility in informing treatment decisions, reliability, and confidence in measurement skills. Participants also preferred active functional ROM ( N = 117, 24%) for being quick, easy, and useful in informing treatment decisions. Participants reported using different methods with time constraints in a busy clinic, taking precautions with pins/wounds, bulky dressings/casts, pain tolerance levels of patients, or with specific pathologies. Participants’ responses to the multi-stage vignette identified distinct patterns of clinical reasoning approaches within individual vignettes. Hand therapists use multiple methods to measure finger ROM while preferring to use goniometers to measure individual finger joints. They engage procedural and pragmatic reasoning modified by contextual factors when measuring finger ROM.","PeriodicalId":507164,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"24 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983241237780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of techniques for measuring finger range of motion (ROM) are available for hand therapist use, however, there is no clear description of which finger ROM methods are preferred in practice. This study explored the preferred measurement techniques, the factors influencing clinical decision-making, and the clinical reasoning processes employed when faced with practice-based measurement scenarios. This was a cross-sectional online survey study of hand therapists and American or Canadian Society of Hand Therapists members. Quantitative methods were employed for participant demographics and categorical clinical questions about practice patterns. Qualitative descriptive questions and vignettes were analysed using inductive and deductive content analysis, respectively. Four hundred and eighty-one responses were included, representing hand therapists with a median age of 51 years and median experience of 19 years. Participants preferred measuring individual joints with a goniometer ( N = 210, 44%) for perceived utility in informing treatment decisions, reliability, and confidence in measurement skills. Participants also preferred active functional ROM ( N = 117, 24%) for being quick, easy, and useful in informing treatment decisions. Participants reported using different methods with time constraints in a busy clinic, taking precautions with pins/wounds, bulky dressings/casts, pain tolerance levels of patients, or with specific pathologies. Participants’ responses to the multi-stage vignette identified distinct patterns of clinical reasoning approaches within individual vignettes. Hand therapists use multiple methods to measure finger ROM while preferring to use goniometers to measure individual finger joints. They engage procedural and pragmatic reasoning modified by contextual factors when measuring finger ROM.
手部治疗实践中如何测量手指的活动范围?一项调查研究
目前有多种测量手指运动范围(ROM)的技术可供手部治疗师使用,但对于在实践中哪些手指运动范围测量方法更受青睐却没有明确的描述。本研究探讨了首选的测量技术、影响临床决策的因素,以及面对基于实践的测量情景时所采用的临床推理过程。这是一项针对手部治疗师和美国或加拿大手部治疗师协会会员的横断面在线调查研究。采用定量方法对参与者的人口统计学特征和有关实践模式的分类临床问题进行了调查。定性描述性问题和小故事分别采用归纳和演绎内容分析法进行分析。共收到 481 份回复,其中手部治疗师的年龄中位数为 51 岁,经验中位数为 19 年。参与者倾向于使用动态关节角度计测量单个关节(210 人,占 44%),这是因为他们认为动态关节角度计在为治疗决策提供信息、可靠性和对测量技能的信心方面具有实用性。此外,参与者还偏好主动功能性 ROM(N = 117,24%),因为它快速、简便且有助于为治疗决策提供依据。参与者表示,在繁忙的诊所中,由于时间限制,在针脚/伤口、大块敷料/石膏、患者疼痛耐受程度或特定病理情况下,会使用不同的方法。从参与者对多阶段小故事的回答中,可以发现在各个小故事中临床推理方法的不同模式。手部治疗师使用多种方法测量手指的活动度,但更倾向于使用动态关节角度计测量单个手指关节。在测量手指关节活动度时,他们采用的程序性推理和实用性推理会受到环境因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信