Testing and optimizing metabarcoding of iDNA from dung beetles to sample mammals in the hyperdiverse Neotropics

IF 5.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Bruno H. Saranholi, Filipe M. França, Alfried P. Vogler, Jos Barlow, Fernando Z. Vaz de Mello, Maria E. Maldaner, Edrielly Carvalho, Carla C. Gestich, Benjamin Howes, Cristina Banks-Leite, Pedro M. Galetti Jr
{"title":"Testing and optimizing metabarcoding of iDNA from dung beetles to sample mammals in the hyperdiverse Neotropics","authors":"Bruno H. Saranholi,&nbsp;Filipe M. França,&nbsp;Alfried P. Vogler,&nbsp;Jos Barlow,&nbsp;Fernando Z. Vaz de Mello,&nbsp;Maria E. Maldaner,&nbsp;Edrielly Carvalho,&nbsp;Carla C. Gestich,&nbsp;Benjamin Howes,&nbsp;Cristina Banks-Leite,&nbsp;Pedro M. Galetti Jr","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.13961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past few years, insects have been used as samplers of vertebrate diversity by assessing the ingested-derived DNA (iDNA), and dung beetles have been shown to be a good mammal sampler given their broad feeding preference, wide distribution and easy sampling. Here, we tested and optimized the use of iDNA from dung beetles to assess the mammal community by evaluating if some biological and methodological aspects affect the use of dung beetles as mammal species samplers. We collected 403 dung beetles from 60 pitfall traps. iDNA from each dung beetle was sequenced by metabarcoding using two mini-barcodes (12SrRNA and 16SrRNA). We assessed whether dung beetles with different traits related to feeding, nesting and body size differed in the number of mammal species found in their iDNA. We also tested differences among four killing solutions in preserving the iDNA and compared the effectiveness of each mini barcode to recover mammals. We identified a total of 50 mammal OTUs (operational taxonomic unit), including terrestrial and arboreal species from 10 different orders. We found that at least one mammal-matching sequence was obtained from 70% of the dung beetle specimens. The number of mammal OTUs obtained did not vary with dung beetle traits as well as between the killing solutions. The 16SrRNA mini-barcode recovered a higher number of mammal OTUs than 12SrRNA, although both sets were partly non-overlapping. Thus, the complete mammal diversity may not be achieved by using only one of them. This study refines the methodology for routine assessment of tropical mammal communities via dung beetle ‘samplers’ and its universal applicability independently of the species traits of local beetle communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"24 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1755-0998.13961","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past few years, insects have been used as samplers of vertebrate diversity by assessing the ingested-derived DNA (iDNA), and dung beetles have been shown to be a good mammal sampler given their broad feeding preference, wide distribution and easy sampling. Here, we tested and optimized the use of iDNA from dung beetles to assess the mammal community by evaluating if some biological and methodological aspects affect the use of dung beetles as mammal species samplers. We collected 403 dung beetles from 60 pitfall traps. iDNA from each dung beetle was sequenced by metabarcoding using two mini-barcodes (12SrRNA and 16SrRNA). We assessed whether dung beetles with different traits related to feeding, nesting and body size differed in the number of mammal species found in their iDNA. We also tested differences among four killing solutions in preserving the iDNA and compared the effectiveness of each mini barcode to recover mammals. We identified a total of 50 mammal OTUs (operational taxonomic unit), including terrestrial and arboreal species from 10 different orders. We found that at least one mammal-matching sequence was obtained from 70% of the dung beetle specimens. The number of mammal OTUs obtained did not vary with dung beetle traits as well as between the killing solutions. The 16SrRNA mini-barcode recovered a higher number of mammal OTUs than 12SrRNA, although both sets were partly non-overlapping. Thus, the complete mammal diversity may not be achieved by using only one of them. This study refines the methodology for routine assessment of tropical mammal communities via dung beetle ‘samplers’ and its universal applicability independently of the species traits of local beetle communities.

测试并优化蜣螂 iDNA 的代谢标码,以对多样性极高的新热带地区的哺乳动物进行采样。
在过去的几年中,昆虫被用作脊椎动物多样性的取样器,通过评估摄食衍生DNA(iDNA),蜣螂已被证明是一种很好的哺乳动物取样器,因为它们有广泛的摄食偏好、分布广泛且易于取样。在这里,我们测试并优化了利用蜣螂的iDNA来评估哺乳动物群落的方法,评估了一些生物学和方法学方面的问题是否会影响蜣螂作为哺乳动物物种采样器的使用。我们从 60 个坑式捕集器中收集了 403 只蜣螂。每只蜣螂的 iDNA 都通过两个微型条码(12SrRNA 和 16SrRNA)进行了代谢编码测序。我们评估了与取食、筑巢和体型有关的不同性状的蜣螂在其 iDNA 中发现的哺乳动物物种数量上是否存在差异。我们还测试了四种杀灭方案在保存 iDNA 方面的差异,并比较了每种迷你条形码对恢复哺乳动物的有效性。我们共鉴定了 50 个哺乳动物 OTU(操作分类单元),包括 10 个不同目中的陆生和树栖物种。我们发现,从 70% 的蜣螂标本中至少获得了一个哺乳动物匹配序列。获得的哺乳动物 OTU 数量并不因屎壳郎的性状以及不同的杀灭溶液而异。与 12SrRNA 相比,16SrRNA mini-barcode 恢复的哺乳动物 OTU 数量更多,尽管两组序列部分不重叠。因此,仅使用其中一种方法可能无法获得完整的哺乳动物多样性。这项研究完善了通过屎壳郎 "采样器 "对热带哺乳动物群落进行常规评估的方法,以及该方法的普遍适用性,而不受当地甲虫群落物种特征的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology Resources 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
5.20%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines. In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信