Comparing and analyzing elite soft tennis players

IF 0.5 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Nathapol Thongthanapat, Watunyou Khamros
{"title":"Comparing and analyzing elite soft tennis players","authors":"Nathapol Thongthanapat, Watunyou Khamros","doi":"10.55860/4pmqkk49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysing data from high-level matches soft tennis from elite players is something that coaches and athletes can use to improve their training and competition. The study aimed to compare the match workload action areas and analyse techniques between male and female soft tennis players in high-level competitions from soft tennis in 10 final matches. Data analysis of match workload, techniques, and action areas occur in matches performed using the Dartfish software. The data is analysed statistically, compared between males and females for match workload, and presented as percentages for each technique and action area. The results of the analysis showed that Rally time shots, Rally total time Work Density, and Percentage rally during the match of male players were significantly higher than those of female players, p ≤ .05. The Flat technique was used more at the competition (Male; Forehand 38.77% Backhand 39.19% and Female player, Forehand and Backhand are equal at 36.91%) with the correlation between both techniques being r = .0974. Slice and Lob techniques 3.00-10.08%, and Volley and Smash techniques used the least during matches. The playing area of all players will be at the Mid left, up to 31.99-41.10%. Fore right is the area with the least play, 1.97-3.21%. Data from the study shows that male players have a higher match workload than women. However, there are no differences in the use of techniques in the competition, including the playing action area. This result will help coaches and players practice and develop their abilities at a higher level.","PeriodicalId":51651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Sport and Exercise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55860/4pmqkk49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analysing data from high-level matches soft tennis from elite players is something that coaches and athletes can use to improve their training and competition. The study aimed to compare the match workload action areas and analyse techniques between male and female soft tennis players in high-level competitions from soft tennis in 10 final matches. Data analysis of match workload, techniques, and action areas occur in matches performed using the Dartfish software. The data is analysed statistically, compared between males and females for match workload, and presented as percentages for each technique and action area. The results of the analysis showed that Rally time shots, Rally total time Work Density, and Percentage rally during the match of male players were significantly higher than those of female players, p ≤ .05. The Flat technique was used more at the competition (Male; Forehand 38.77% Backhand 39.19% and Female player, Forehand and Backhand are equal at 36.91%) with the correlation between both techniques being r = .0974. Slice and Lob techniques 3.00-10.08%, and Volley and Smash techniques used the least during matches. The playing area of all players will be at the Mid left, up to 31.99-41.10%. Fore right is the area with the least play, 1.97-3.21%. Data from the study shows that male players have a higher match workload than women. However, there are no differences in the use of techniques in the competition, including the playing action area. This result will help coaches and players practice and develop their abilities at a higher level.
比较和分析软式网球精英运动员
对精英选手参加高水平软式网球比赛的数据进行分析,可以帮助教练员和运动员提高训练和比赛水平。这项研究旨在比较软式网球高水平比赛中男女选手在 10 场决赛中的比赛工作量、动作区域和技术分析。使用 Dartfish 软件对比赛中的工作量、技术和动作区域进行数据分析。对数据进行统计分析,比较男女选手的比赛工作量,并以百分比的形式显示每种技术和动作区域。分析结果表明,在比赛中,男选手的拉杆击球时间、拉杆总时间工作密度和拉杆百分比明显高于女选手,P ≤ .05。在比赛中,平拍技术使用较多(男选手正手38.77%,反手39.19%,女选手正手和反手36.91%),两种技术之间的相关性为r=0.0974。在比赛中,削球和吊球技术的使用率为 3.00-10.08%,排球和抽球技术的使用率最低。所有球员的击球区域都在中左侧,高达 31.99-41.10%。前右侧是使用最少的区域,为 1.97%-3.21%。研究数据显示,男性球员的比赛工作量高于女性球员。不过,在比赛中,包括打球动作区域在内的技术使用方面并无差异。这一结果将有助于教练和球员在更高水平上练习和发展自己的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: JHSE contributes to the continuing professional development of sport and exercise sciences, including a high-level research in biomechanics, exercise physiology, sports history, nutrition, and a wide range of social and ethical issues in physical activity, and other aspects of sports medicine related quality of life and biophysical investigation of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信