The Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Disabilities: Validity and Reliability

C. Gee, Ava Neely, Aleksandra Jevdjevic, Kenedy Olsen, K. M. Martin Ginis
{"title":"The Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Disabilities: Validity and Reliability","authors":"C. Gee, Ava Neely, Aleksandra Jevdjevic, Kenedy Olsen, K. M. Martin Ginis","doi":"10.3390/disabilities4020021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an urgent need for valid and reliable measures of physical activity (PA) participation for use among people with physical and/or sensory disabilities. This study involved adapting the Leisure Time PA Questionnaire for People with Spinal Cord Injury for use in individuals with disabilities (i.e., the LTPAQ-D) and performing a preliminary evaluation of its content validity, construct validity, and same-day test–retest reliability in people with disabilities. User interviews assessed the content validity (n = 5). A cross-sectional study assessed the construct validity and same-day test–retest reliability (n = 27, 45 ± 21 years). Participants completed the LTPAQ-D, other self-report measures of aerobic and strength training PA, as well as tests of cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e., peak oxygen consumption (V˙O2peak)) and muscular strength. LTPAQ-D measures of min/week of aerobic LTPA, aerobic moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), and strength training shared medium-to-large correlations with other self-report measures of aerobic and strength training PA (r = 0.458–0.942, ps < 0.01). After controlling for age, aerobic LTPA and MVPA shared moderate partial correlations with V˙O2peak (r = 0.341 and 0.356, respectively). Min/week of strength training, measured by the LTPAQ-D, was associated with predicted maximal strength on the chest press (r = 0.621, p = 0.009). All LTPAQ-D measures demonstrated good-to-excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlations = 0.709–0.948, ps < 0.01). This study provides preliminary evidence of the validity and reliability of the LTPAQ-D as a measure of LTPA among people with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":505877,"journal":{"name":"Disabilities","volume":"21 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities4020021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an urgent need for valid and reliable measures of physical activity (PA) participation for use among people with physical and/or sensory disabilities. This study involved adapting the Leisure Time PA Questionnaire for People with Spinal Cord Injury for use in individuals with disabilities (i.e., the LTPAQ-D) and performing a preliminary evaluation of its content validity, construct validity, and same-day test–retest reliability in people with disabilities. User interviews assessed the content validity (n = 5). A cross-sectional study assessed the construct validity and same-day test–retest reliability (n = 27, 45 ± 21 years). Participants completed the LTPAQ-D, other self-report measures of aerobic and strength training PA, as well as tests of cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e., peak oxygen consumption (V˙O2peak)) and muscular strength. LTPAQ-D measures of min/week of aerobic LTPA, aerobic moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), and strength training shared medium-to-large correlations with other self-report measures of aerobic and strength training PA (r = 0.458–0.942, ps < 0.01). After controlling for age, aerobic LTPA and MVPA shared moderate partial correlations with V˙O2peak (r = 0.341 and 0.356, respectively). Min/week of strength training, measured by the LTPAQ-D, was associated with predicted maximal strength on the chest press (r = 0.621, p = 0.009). All LTPAQ-D measures demonstrated good-to-excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlations = 0.709–0.948, ps < 0.01). This study provides preliminary evidence of the validity and reliability of the LTPAQ-D as a measure of LTPA among people with disabilities.
残疾人闲暇体育活动问卷:有效性和可靠性
肢体和/或感官残障人士迫切需要有效、可靠的体育活动(PA)参与度测量方法。本研究对脊髓损伤患者闲暇时间体育锻炼问卷(即 LTPAQ-D)进行了改编,以适用于残疾人,并对其在残疾人中的内容效度、结构效度和当日测试-再测信度进行了初步评估。用户访谈评估了内容效度(n = 5)。一项横断面研究评估了该问卷的结构效度和当日重测信度(n = 27,45 ± 21 岁)。参与者完成了LTPAQ-D、其他有氧和力量训练PA的自我报告测量,以及心肺功能(即峰值耗氧量(V˙O2peak))和肌肉力量测试。LTPAQ-D测量的每周有氧LTPA分钟数、有氧中强度PA(MVPA)和力量训练与其他自我报告的有氧和力量训练PA测量值具有中到大的相关性(r = 0.458-0.942,ps < 0.01)。在对年龄进行控制后,有氧长时活动量(LTPA)和中时活动量(MVPA)与 V˙O2峰呈中等偏相关性(r = 0.341 和 0.356)。通过 LTPAQ-D 测量的每周最小力量训练与预测的胸外压最大力量相关(r = 0.621,p = 0.009)。所有LTPAQ-D测量指标均显示出良好至卓越的测试-再测可靠性(类内相关系数=0.709-0.948,PS < 0.01)。本研究初步证明了LTPAQ-D作为残疾人LTPA测量方法的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信