Melancholy, Spiritual Experience, and Dissent in England, c. 1650–1700

Finola Finn
{"title":"Melancholy, Spiritual Experience, and Dissent in England, c. 1650–1700","authors":"Finola Finn","doi":"10.1017/s0018246x2400013x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The involvement of melancholy had the potential to undermine the authority of early modern individuals’ religious experiences, reframing their spiritual afflictions as the mere product of a distempered body. This article refines our understanding of the shifting relationship between melancholy and spiritual experience in the second half of the seventeenth century in England. Focusing on the views of Presbyterians and Independents, it explores how various interests and voices shaped attitudes to the disease throughout the challenges of growing anti-enthusiasm and post-Restoration nonconformity. By emphasizing the voices of sufferers themselves and including examination of a range of overlooked texts, it demonstrates that women and laypeople often diverged from learned views when describing their spiritual struggles. Complicating existing narratives, it suggests that sufferers from both groups avoided using melancholy as an explanatory factor in accounts of religious experience in the 1650s to ’70s, before increasingly incorporating the condition in the 1680s and ’90s. The involvement of melancholy remained fraught, however, and under continual negotiation. Bringing manuscript sources into conversation with published texts, the article argues that differences of opinion existed both between and within Presbyterian and Independent communities, as well as between those who suffered from melancholy and those who did not.","PeriodicalId":515830,"journal":{"name":"The Historical Journal","volume":"29 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Historical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x2400013x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The involvement of melancholy had the potential to undermine the authority of early modern individuals’ religious experiences, reframing their spiritual afflictions as the mere product of a distempered body. This article refines our understanding of the shifting relationship between melancholy and spiritual experience in the second half of the seventeenth century in England. Focusing on the views of Presbyterians and Independents, it explores how various interests and voices shaped attitudes to the disease throughout the challenges of growing anti-enthusiasm and post-Restoration nonconformity. By emphasizing the voices of sufferers themselves and including examination of a range of overlooked texts, it demonstrates that women and laypeople often diverged from learned views when describing their spiritual struggles. Complicating existing narratives, it suggests that sufferers from both groups avoided using melancholy as an explanatory factor in accounts of religious experience in the 1650s to ’70s, before increasingly incorporating the condition in the 1680s and ’90s. The involvement of melancholy remained fraught, however, and under continual negotiation. Bringing manuscript sources into conversation with published texts, the article argues that differences of opinion existed both between and within Presbyterian and Independent communities, as well as between those who suffered from melancholy and those who did not.
约 1650-1700 年英国的忧郁症、精神体验和异见者
忧郁症的介入有可能削弱现代早期个人宗教体验的权威性,将他们的精神痛苦重新定格为仅仅是身体失调的产物。本文完善了我们对 17 世纪下半叶英国忧郁症与精神体验之间关系变化的理解。文章以长老会教徒和独立派教徒的观点为重点,探讨了各种利益和声音是如何在日益增长的反热情和复兴后的非一致性挑战中塑造人们对疾病的态度的。通过强调患者自己的声音,并对一系列被忽视的文本进行研究,该书证明了妇女和非专业人士在描述其精神挣扎时往往与学识观点相左。该书使现有的叙述变得复杂,它表明,在 16 世纪 50 年代至 70 年代,两个群体的受难者在讲述宗教经历时都避免将忧郁症作为一种解释因素,而在 16 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代,则越来越多地将忧郁症纳入其中。然而,忧郁症的介入仍然充满争议,并在不断协商之中。文章将手稿资料与出版文本结合起来,论证了长老会和独立派社区之间和内部,以及患有忧郁症的人和没有忧郁症的人之间存在的意见分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信