Rural homestead reform in China: unveiling urbanization dynamics and lessons for sustainable development

Liu Yahui, Qiming Liu, Fangfang Jiao
{"title":"Rural homestead reform in China: unveiling urbanization dynamics and lessons for sustainable development","authors":"Liu Yahui, Qiming Liu, Fangfang Jiao","doi":"10.3389/frsus.2024.1391612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unique experience of land reform in China holds significant implications for other nations in urgent need of liberating and developing their productivity, providing valuable insights and lessons. This study conducted a micro-level analysis of land reform in China, the United States, and India, focusing on the implications for other nations. Surveys were conducted on 459 households in 12 townships in Zhejiang and Sichuan provinces, China. A random sampling approach was employed, selecting 5 sample counties (cities, districts) across Jinhua, Shaoxing, and Chengdu. Within each county (city, district), 2–3 townships were randomly selected, and 2–3 villages were chosen from each township. Subsequently, 10–20 households were randomly surveyed in each village. Statistical analysis using descriptive statistics and the Logistic model revealed robust results with p values below 0.05 for key variables. China’s new urbanization strategy highlights the necessity of reforming the rural homestead system, particularly as higher urbanization rates prompt farmers to withdraw from and transfer their homesteads worldwide. Tailored homestead policies that consider regional disparities in urbanization levels are crucial. A micro-level survey underscores the impact of urbanization, household head identity, and age on farmers’ decisions regarding homestead exit and transfer. Addressing external pressures, efforts should prioritize the revitalization of rural areas and the promotion of sustainable development. This includes enhancing small and medium-sized cities, fostering on-site urbanization, and creating nearby employment opportunities for farmers. However, the effectiveness of these measures varies across regions and is influenced by local levels of marketization. Internally, there is a need to bolster skill training and vocational education for farmers. In summary, the policy recommendations stemming from the micro-level survey in this study offer valuable insights for land reform strategies and sustainable development initiatives, spanning from individual farmers to national policies. They also contribute to a deeper understanding for policymakers, providing a novel analytical perspective.","PeriodicalId":475046,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sustainability","volume":"94 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1391612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The unique experience of land reform in China holds significant implications for other nations in urgent need of liberating and developing their productivity, providing valuable insights and lessons. This study conducted a micro-level analysis of land reform in China, the United States, and India, focusing on the implications for other nations. Surveys were conducted on 459 households in 12 townships in Zhejiang and Sichuan provinces, China. A random sampling approach was employed, selecting 5 sample counties (cities, districts) across Jinhua, Shaoxing, and Chengdu. Within each county (city, district), 2–3 townships were randomly selected, and 2–3 villages were chosen from each township. Subsequently, 10–20 households were randomly surveyed in each village. Statistical analysis using descriptive statistics and the Logistic model revealed robust results with p values below 0.05 for key variables. China’s new urbanization strategy highlights the necessity of reforming the rural homestead system, particularly as higher urbanization rates prompt farmers to withdraw from and transfer their homesteads worldwide. Tailored homestead policies that consider regional disparities in urbanization levels are crucial. A micro-level survey underscores the impact of urbanization, household head identity, and age on farmers’ decisions regarding homestead exit and transfer. Addressing external pressures, efforts should prioritize the revitalization of rural areas and the promotion of sustainable development. This includes enhancing small and medium-sized cities, fostering on-site urbanization, and creating nearby employment opportunities for farmers. However, the effectiveness of these measures varies across regions and is influenced by local levels of marketization. Internally, there is a need to bolster skill training and vocational education for farmers. In summary, the policy recommendations stemming from the micro-level survey in this study offer valuable insights for land reform strategies and sustainable development initiatives, spanning from individual farmers to national policies. They also contribute to a deeper understanding for policymakers, providing a novel analytical perspective.
中国的农村宅基地改革:揭示城市化动态和可持续发展的经验教训
中国土地改革的独特经验对其他急需解放和发展生产力的国家具有重要意义,提供了宝贵的启示和经验。本研究对中国、美国和印度的土地改革进行了微观分析,重点关注对其他国家的影响。对中国浙江省和四川省 12 个乡镇的 459 户家庭进行了调查。调查采用随机抽样的方法,在金华、绍兴和成都三地抽取了 5 个样本县(市、区)。每个县(市、区)随机抽取 2-3 个乡镇,每个乡镇抽取 2-3 个村。随后,在每个村随机调查 10-20 户家庭。使用描述性统计和 Logistic 模型进行的统计分析显示,主要变量的 P 值均低于 0.05,结果稳健。中国的新型城镇化战略凸显了改革农村宅基地制度的必要性,特别是随着城镇化率的提高,促使农民在全球范围内退出和转让宅基地。考虑到城市化水平的地区差异而量身定制的宅基地政策至关重要。一项微观调查强调了城市化、户主身份和年龄对农民决定退出和转让宅基地的影响。针对外部压力,应优先考虑振兴农村地区和促进可持续发展。这包括加强中小城市建设,促进就地城镇化,为农民创造就近就业机会。然而,这些措施在不同地区的效果各不相同,并受到当地市场化水平的影响。在内部,需要加强对农民的技能培训和职业教育。总之,本研究中的微观调查所产生的政策建议为土地改革战略和可持续发展倡议提供了有价值的见解,涵盖了从个体农民到国家政策的各个层面。它们还有助于决策者加深理解,提供了一个新颖的分析视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信