The stability and acceptance of the “system of competency‐based curriculum design” framework: Perspectives of teachers

Hsiao‐Fang Lin, Hsiu‐Lien Lu, Mei‐Jiun Lin
{"title":"The stability and acceptance of the “system of competency‐based curriculum design” framework: Perspectives of teachers","authors":"Hsiao‐Fang Lin, Hsiu‐Lien Lu, Mei‐Jiun Lin","doi":"10.1002/curj.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “System of Competency‐Based Curriculum Design” (SCCD) framework was developed to meet the requirement for reform in competency‐based education and overcome the limitations of Understanding by Design (UbD). This comprehensive framework, incorporating knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values, aligns with competency ingredients as defined by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and integrates diverse curriculum theories. It provides educators with clear steps and empowers them to make iterative calibration while designing units/courses, ensuring a dynamic and responsive approach to curriculum development. To assess the stability and acceptance of the SCCD framework, a research instrument was developed, encompassing five stability subscales with a total of 25 items and an additional acceptance subscale featuring five items. A total of 455 participants who participated in SCCD training workshops were involved in the study. The research outcomes affirm the robustness of its theoretical foundation. Additionally, the unequivocal endorsement of its concept by teachers from diverse backgrounds serves as further validation of its integrity. The study concludes with recommendations derived from the obtained results.","PeriodicalId":93147,"journal":{"name":"The curriculum journal","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The curriculum journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The “System of Competency‐Based Curriculum Design” (SCCD) framework was developed to meet the requirement for reform in competency‐based education and overcome the limitations of Understanding by Design (UbD). This comprehensive framework, incorporating knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values, aligns with competency ingredients as defined by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and integrates diverse curriculum theories. It provides educators with clear steps and empowers them to make iterative calibration while designing units/courses, ensuring a dynamic and responsive approach to curriculum development. To assess the stability and acceptance of the SCCD framework, a research instrument was developed, encompassing five stability subscales with a total of 25 items and an additional acceptance subscale featuring five items. A total of 455 participants who participated in SCCD training workshops were involved in the study. The research outcomes affirm the robustness of its theoretical foundation. Additionally, the unequivocal endorsement of its concept by teachers from diverse backgrounds serves as further validation of its integrity. The study concludes with recommendations derived from the obtained results.
基于能力的课程设计体系 "框架的稳定性和可接受性:教师的观点
能力本位课程设计体系"(SCCD)框架是为了满足能力本位教育改革的要求,克服 "按设计理解"(UbD)的局限性而开发的。这一综合框架包含知识、技能、态度和价值观,与经济合作与发展组织(OECD)定义的能力要素相一致,并整合了各种课程理论。它为教育工作者提供了清晰的步骤,使他们能够在设计单元/课程时进行迭代校准,确保以动态和反应灵敏的方式进行课程开发。为了评估 "校本课程开发 "框架的稳定性和接受度,我们开发了一个研究工具,其中包括五个稳定性子量表,共 25 个项目,以及一个额外的接受度子量表,共 5 个项目。共有 455 名参加过 SCCD 培训讲习班的人员参与了这项研究。研究结果肯定了其理论基础的稳健性。此外,来自不同背景的教师对其概念的明确认可也进一步验证了其完整性。最后,本研究根据所获得的结果提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信