Therapeutic effects of mobilization in alleviating pain and improving shoulder mobility in adhesive capsulitis – A systematic review

Aqdas Shahzad, Muhammad Azhar, Hassan Zafar, Muhammad A. Khan, Sana Shakir
{"title":"Therapeutic effects of mobilization in alleviating pain and improving shoulder mobility in adhesive capsulitis – A systematic review","authors":"Aqdas Shahzad, Muhammad Azhar, Hassan Zafar, Muhammad A. Khan, Sana Shakir","doi":"10.25259/jmsr_54_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frozen shoulder (FS) is a painful clinical disease that lasts over three months and affects 3–5% of the general population. The main goal of this review was to show how mobilization techniques can affect FS treatment compared to other physiotherapy options. A systematic review of randomized controlled studies from CINAHL, MEDLINE, AMED, and PubMed published after 2010. Studies that included patients 18 or older with FS, but no other underlying systemic disorders were eligible. The review focused on two primary outcomes: Pain levels and how effectively patients could move their shoulders. The quality of the studies was assessed using the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) technique. Six randomized controlled studies with a PEDro score of 5/10 that met the study requirements were included. The pain was reduced in three of the five investigations with P < 0.05, whereas the remaining studies yielded neutral findings in lowering pain in patients with FS. All of the individuals’ range of motion (ROM) was evaluated. With P < 0.05, four of the six trials showed an improvement in shoulder ROM. Bending, straightening, moving arms away from the body, bringing them back in, internal rotation, and external rotation were all assessed and shown to be significant with P ≤ 0.05. Most studies suggested that patients, who have received mobilization treatment, experienced positive improvements. Techniques such as Mulligan mobilization, scapular mobilization, passive mobilization, and angular joint mobilization have proven effective in addressing pain and improving the ROM in individuals with FSs.","PeriodicalId":503319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research","volume":"116 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jmsr_54_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frozen shoulder (FS) is a painful clinical disease that lasts over three months and affects 3–5% of the general population. The main goal of this review was to show how mobilization techniques can affect FS treatment compared to other physiotherapy options. A systematic review of randomized controlled studies from CINAHL, MEDLINE, AMED, and PubMed published after 2010. Studies that included patients 18 or older with FS, but no other underlying systemic disorders were eligible. The review focused on two primary outcomes: Pain levels and how effectively patients could move their shoulders. The quality of the studies was assessed using the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) technique. Six randomized controlled studies with a PEDro score of 5/10 that met the study requirements were included. The pain was reduced in three of the five investigations with P < 0.05, whereas the remaining studies yielded neutral findings in lowering pain in patients with FS. All of the individuals’ range of motion (ROM) was evaluated. With P < 0.05, four of the six trials showed an improvement in shoulder ROM. Bending, straightening, moving arms away from the body, bringing them back in, internal rotation, and external rotation were all assessed and shown to be significant with P ≤ 0.05. Most studies suggested that patients, who have received mobilization treatment, experienced positive improvements. Techniques such as Mulligan mobilization, scapular mobilization, passive mobilization, and angular joint mobilization have proven effective in addressing pain and improving the ROM in individuals with FSs.
活动对缓解粘连性肩关节囊炎患者疼痛和改善肩关节活动度的治疗效果 - 系统综述
肩周炎(FS)是一种持续时间超过三个月的疼痛性临床疾病,影响着3-5%的普通人群。本综述的主要目的是说明与其他物理治疗方法相比,肩周炎动员技术如何影响肩周炎的治疗。本研究对 2010 年后发表的 CINAHL、MEDLINE、AMED 和 PubMed 中的随机对照研究进行了系统性回顾。研究对象包括 18 岁或以上的 FS 患者,但不包括其他潜在的系统性疾病。审查重点关注两个主要结果:疼痛程度和患者活动肩膀的效率。研究质量采用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)技术进行评估。其中包括六项符合研究要求的随机对照研究,PEDro评分为5/10。在五项研究中,有三项研究的疼痛减轻了,P<0.05,而其余研究在减轻 FS 患者疼痛方面的结果为中性。对所有患者的活动范围(ROM)进行了评估。六项试验中有四项显示肩关节活动范围有所改善,P<0.05。弯腰、伸直、手臂离开身体、收回、内旋和外旋都进行了评估,结果表明P≤0.05时有显著改善。大多数研究表明,接受动员治疗的患者都能获得积极的改善。穆里根(Mulligan)动员、肩胛骨动员、被动动员和角关节动员等技术已被证明能有效解决FSs患者的疼痛并改善其ROM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信