Evaluation of an intervention package to reduce occupational stress among secondary school teachers: a cluster randomized study

B. Denuwara, N. Gunawardena, M. Dayabandara, D. Samaranayake
{"title":"Evaluation of an intervention package to reduce occupational stress among secondary school teachers: a cluster randomized study","authors":"B. Denuwara, N. Gunawardena, M. Dayabandara, D. Samaranayake","doi":"10.4038/jccpsl.v30i1.8618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Prevalence of occupational stress (OS) among seconda ry teachers in the district of Colombo, Sri Lanka was found to be 83.4% in 2017, indicating the need for an intervention t o prevent its effects. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to reduc e OS among secondary teachers in Sinhala medium government schools in the district of Colombo Methods: A cluster randomized trial (SLCTR/2019/017) used cluster s of 10 secondary schools in Colombo District, which were assigned randomly to intervention and control arms; each ar m had 300 teachers. A package of nine-sessions of cognitive behavioural (CB) and relaxation technique-based activities  designed through evidence generated in a systematic review was delivered as interactive group sessions over a period of si x months. Effectiveness of the intervention in reducing OS was assessed after four weeks using multivariate Generalized E stimating Equation analysis. Reducing psychological distress and adopting healthy lifestyles were assessed as secondary out comes of the intervention. Results: Intervention was significantly effective in reducing OS  (OR=0.3; 95% CI=0.2, 0.5), psychological distress (OR=0.03; 95% CI=0.01, 0.07) and smoking (OR=0.09; 95% CI= 0.01, 0.7) among the teachers. It also significantly increased the knowledge about OS (OR=0.6; 95% CI=0.5, 0.7), hea lthiness of diet (OR=0.3; 95% CI=0.2, 0.4), level of adequate physical activity (OR=3.2; 95% CI=2.1, 4.9) and effecti ve coping of OS (OR=0.2; 95% CI=0.17, 0.3). The relative risk reduction (RRR) of OS with the intervention remained at  22.6%, the absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 19.4% and the number needed to treat (NNT) was five. Conclusions & Recommendations: The intervention package wa s highly effective to reduce OS among secondary teachers and is recommended to be incorporated to the basic training  of teachers or implemented through the school health programme.","PeriodicalId":120205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jccpsl.v30i1.8618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prevalence of occupational stress (OS) among seconda ry teachers in the district of Colombo, Sri Lanka was found to be 83.4% in 2017, indicating the need for an intervention t o prevent its effects. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to reduc e OS among secondary teachers in Sinhala medium government schools in the district of Colombo Methods: A cluster randomized trial (SLCTR/2019/017) used cluster s of 10 secondary schools in Colombo District, which were assigned randomly to intervention and control arms; each ar m had 300 teachers. A package of nine-sessions of cognitive behavioural (CB) and relaxation technique-based activities  designed through evidence generated in a systematic review was delivered as interactive group sessions over a period of si x months. Effectiveness of the intervention in reducing OS was assessed after four weeks using multivariate Generalized E stimating Equation analysis. Reducing psychological distress and adopting healthy lifestyles were assessed as secondary out comes of the intervention. Results: Intervention was significantly effective in reducing OS  (OR=0.3; 95% CI=0.2, 0.5), psychological distress (OR=0.03; 95% CI=0.01, 0.07) and smoking (OR=0.09; 95% CI= 0.01, 0.7) among the teachers. It also significantly increased the knowledge about OS (OR=0.6; 95% CI=0.5, 0.7), hea lthiness of diet (OR=0.3; 95% CI=0.2, 0.4), level of adequate physical activity (OR=3.2; 95% CI=2.1, 4.9) and effecti ve coping of OS (OR=0.2; 95% CI=0.17, 0.3). The relative risk reduction (RRR) of OS with the intervention remained at  22.6%, the absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 19.4% and the number needed to treat (NNT) was five. Conclusions & Recommendations: The intervention package wa s highly effective to reduce OS among secondary teachers and is recommended to be incorporated to the basic training  of teachers or implemented through the school health programme.
评估减轻中学教师职业压力的一揽子干预措施:分组随机研究
导言:2017 年,斯里兰卡科伦坡地区中学教师的职业压力(OS)发生率为 83.4%,这表明有必要采取干预措施来预防其影响。目标:评估职业倦怠干预措施的有效性:评估减少科伦坡地区僧伽罗语授课公立学校中学教师职业压力的干预措施的有效性 方法:采用群组随机试验(SLCT)的方法,对科伦坡地区僧伽罗语授课公立学校中学教师的职业压力进行评估:一项分组随机试验(SLCTR/2019/017)在科伦坡地区的10所中学中进行,随机分配到干预组和对照组;每组有300名教师。根据系统综述中的证据设计了一套九节认知行为(CB)和放松技巧活动,以互动小组课程的形式进行,为期si x个月。四周后,使用多变量广义激励方程分析法评估了干预措施在减少 OS 方面的效果。减少心理困扰和采用健康的生活方式被评估为干预的次要结果。结果干预对减少教师的职业病(OR=0.3;95% CI=0.2,0.5)、心理压力(OR=0.03;95% CI=0.01,0.07)和吸烟(OR=0.09;95% CI=0.01,0.7)有明显效果。此外,它还大大提高了教师对职业病的认识(OR=0.6;95% CI=0.5,0.7)、饮食健康(OR=0.3;95% CI=0.2,0.4)、适当的体育锻炼水平(OR=3.2;95% CI=2.1,4.9)以及对职业病的有效应对(OR=0.2;95% CI=0.17,0.3)。干预后,OS的相对风险降低率(RRR)仍为22.6%,绝对风险降低率(ARR)为19.4%,治疗所需次数(NNT)为5次。结论与建议:该干预方案对减少中学教师的职业病非常有效,建议将其纳入教师的基本培训或通过学校健康计划实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信