Ethical Economy as a Methodological Challenge of Postmodernism

Valerii Novikov
{"title":"Ethical Economy as a Methodological Challenge of Postmodernism","authors":"Valerii Novikov","doi":"10.15407/dse2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problem of the compatibility of the economic and ethical foundations of entrepreneurial activity. In the conditions of postmodernism, their connection is blurred by a complex interweaving of economic and ethical motives. The conclusions of researchers who study this issue often contradict actual practice. Moreover, in postmodern philosophy, ethics in the general theoretical sense was not only underestimated, but also not regarded as an acceptable phenomenon. That is why science has not developed a complex of intellectual actions that would have a universal character to neutralize the negative consequences of postmodernism. Considering the growing role of ethical issues in the modern society and their lack of development in the economic environment, it is reasonable to analyze the series of works of the German economist, philosopher and sociologist Peter Koslowski. In his studies, the issues of bridging the gap between ethics and economic rationality associated with postmodernism as a special historical era, which is characterized by a number of specific features that are critical to the emergence and deepening of socio-economic risks, are discussed in a balanced and objective manner. Due to this it is relevant to define the problems of the theory of ethical economy not in isolation, but in interaction and mutual influence with modern transformation processes of postmodernism. The productive attempt to consider these issues was made by Peter Koslowski in his fundamental works: «Postmodern Culture», «Principles of Ethical Economy», «Ethics of Banking». The purpose of this article is to consider, based on the conceptualization of Peter Koslowski’s methodological position, the theoretical concept of ethical economy as a potentially important factor in overcoming the ethical neutralization of the economic system in the postmodern period. The novelty is the definition of ethical economy as a universal theory of rational activity, which takes into account the interaction of various socio-economic factors — ethics, economy and finance, law, sociology, history — which allows it to be interpreted as a multi-subject scientific discipline, the semantic contexts of which determine behavioral choice of economic entities, consumer and humanitarian expectations of the population. The methods of hermeneutics, analysis and synthesis, comparison, abstraction and generalization were used in the research. The main conclusions of the article are characterized by theoretical innovations that can provoke methodological discussions and ultimately contribute to an in-depth study of the multifaceted issues of ethical economy. The detailed and logically consistent concept of ethical economy as a system of economic views on a fair economic order during the period of change of world history eras, change from modernity to postmodernity is presented. The normative side of ethical economy includes legal obligations, which can be properly implemented in laws. In the triad of law, ethics and economics, the principle of efficiency and social justice applies to both law itself and ethics and should be used in the development of adequate legislation.","PeriodicalId":210079,"journal":{"name":"Demography and social economy","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demography and social economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2024.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of the compatibility of the economic and ethical foundations of entrepreneurial activity. In the conditions of postmodernism, their connection is blurred by a complex interweaving of economic and ethical motives. The conclusions of researchers who study this issue often contradict actual practice. Moreover, in postmodern philosophy, ethics in the general theoretical sense was not only underestimated, but also not regarded as an acceptable phenomenon. That is why science has not developed a complex of intellectual actions that would have a universal character to neutralize the negative consequences of postmodernism. Considering the growing role of ethical issues in the modern society and their lack of development in the economic environment, it is reasonable to analyze the series of works of the German economist, philosopher and sociologist Peter Koslowski. In his studies, the issues of bridging the gap between ethics and economic rationality associated with postmodernism as a special historical era, which is characterized by a number of specific features that are critical to the emergence and deepening of socio-economic risks, are discussed in a balanced and objective manner. Due to this it is relevant to define the problems of the theory of ethical economy not in isolation, but in interaction and mutual influence with modern transformation processes of postmodernism. The productive attempt to consider these issues was made by Peter Koslowski in his fundamental works: «Postmodern Culture», «Principles of Ethical Economy», «Ethics of Banking». The purpose of this article is to consider, based on the conceptualization of Peter Koslowski’s methodological position, the theoretical concept of ethical economy as a potentially important factor in overcoming the ethical neutralization of the economic system in the postmodern period. The novelty is the definition of ethical economy as a universal theory of rational activity, which takes into account the interaction of various socio-economic factors — ethics, economy and finance, law, sociology, history — which allows it to be interpreted as a multi-subject scientific discipline, the semantic contexts of which determine behavioral choice of economic entities, consumer and humanitarian expectations of the population. The methods of hermeneutics, analysis and synthesis, comparison, abstraction and generalization were used in the research. The main conclusions of the article are characterized by theoretical innovations that can provoke methodological discussions and ultimately contribute to an in-depth study of the multifaceted issues of ethical economy. The detailed and logically consistent concept of ethical economy as a system of economic views on a fair economic order during the period of change of world history eras, change from modernity to postmodernity is presented. The normative side of ethical economy includes legal obligations, which can be properly implemented in laws. In the triad of law, ethics and economics, the principle of efficiency and social justice applies to both law itself and ethics and should be used in the development of adequate legislation.
伦理经济学是对后现代主义方法论的挑战
这篇文章专门讨论了创业活动的经济基础与道德基础的兼容性问题。在后现代主义条件下,经济动机与道德动机的复杂交织模糊了两者之间的联系。研究这一问题的学者得出的结论往往与实际做法相矛盾。此外,在后现代哲学中,一般理论意义上的伦理不仅被低估,而且不被视为一种可接受的现象。这就是为什么科学没有发展出具有普遍性的智力行动综合体来中和后现代主义的负面影响。考虑到伦理问题在现代社会中日益重要的作用,以及它们在经济环境中缺乏发展,我们有理由对德国经济学家、哲学家和社会学家彼得-科斯洛夫斯基的一系列著作进行分析。后现代主义是一个特殊的历史时代,其特点是对社会经济风险的出现和深化具有关键意义的一些具体特征,在他的研究中,以平衡和客观的方式讨论了弥合与后现代主义相关的伦理和经济理性之间的差距问题。因此,确定伦理经济理论的问题不是孤立的,而是与后现代主义的现代转型过程相互作用和相互影响的。彼得-科斯洛夫斯基(Peter Koslowski)在其基本著作中对这些问题进行了富有成效的尝试:"后现代文化"、"伦理经济原则"、"银行伦理"。本文的目的是根据彼得-科斯洛夫斯基方法论立场的概念化,将伦理经济的理论概念视为克服后现代时期经济体系伦理中性化的潜在重要因素。其新颖之处在于将伦理经济定义为理性活动的普遍理论,考虑到了各种社会经济因素--伦理、经济和金融、法律、社会学、历史--的相互作用,使其可以被解释为一门多主体的科学学科,其语义背景决定了经济实体的行为选择、民众的消费和人道主义期望。研究中使用了诠释学、分析和综合、比较、抽象和概括等方法。文章的主要结论具有理论创新的特点,可以引发方法论的讨论,并最终有助于深入研究伦理经济的多方面问题。文章介绍了伦理经济作为世界历史时代变迁、现代性向后现代性转变时期关于公平经济秩序的经济学观点体系的详细概念和逻辑一致性。伦理经济的规范方面包括法律义务,这些义务可以在法律中得到适当的落实。在法律、伦理和经济的三位一体中,效率和社会公正原则既适用于法律本身,也适用于伦理,并应在制定适当的法律时加以利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信