Sammenhengen mellom utforskende undervisning i naturfag og elevers prestasjoner og interesse for og trivsel med naturvitenskap. Norske resultater fra PISA 2015.

Fredrik Jensen, Marit Kjærnsli, Erik Knain, Maria Løvgren, Andrea Pettersen
{"title":"Sammenhengen mellom utforskende undervisning i naturfag og elevers prestasjoner og interesse for og trivsel med naturvitenskap. Norske resultater fra PISA 2015.","authors":"Fredrik Jensen, Marit Kjærnsli, Erik Knain, Maria Løvgren, Andrea Pettersen","doi":"10.5617/nordina.9335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the results of an analysis of the Norwegian data from PISA 2015. The aim was to investigate the relationship between different types of inquiry-based teaching activities and student achievement and interest and enjoyment. For student interest and enjoyment, the results show a positive relationship with higher exposure to most of the different inquiry-based activities. When it comes to student achievement, our results draw a more complex picture. For instance, the highest mean performance is found for students who reported that they can explain their own thoughts and ideas in most lessons, compared to students who reported that they could do this in either all lessons or less frequently. For other activities, such as planning, carrying out and discussing experiments and investigations, these activities are related to highest performance when they are used less frequently. These results add nuance to our understanding of the relationship between how students perceive inquiry-based teaching activities, student achievement and interest and enjoyment in science in PISA data.","PeriodicalId":37114,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","volume":"58 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.9335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the results of an analysis of the Norwegian data from PISA 2015. The aim was to investigate the relationship between different types of inquiry-based teaching activities and student achievement and interest and enjoyment. For student interest and enjoyment, the results show a positive relationship with higher exposure to most of the different inquiry-based activities. When it comes to student achievement, our results draw a more complex picture. For instance, the highest mean performance is found for students who reported that they can explain their own thoughts and ideas in most lessons, compared to students who reported that they could do this in either all lessons or less frequently. For other activities, such as planning, carrying out and discussing experiments and investigations, these activities are related to highest performance when they are used less frequently. These results add nuance to our understanding of the relationship between how students perceive inquiry-based teaching activities, student achievement and interest and enjoyment in science in PISA data.
探究式科学教学与学生的成绩以及对科学的兴趣和喜爱之间的关系。挪威2015年国际学生评估项目(PISA)结果。
本文介绍了对挪威2015年国际学生评估项目(PISA)数据的分析结果。其目的是研究不同类型的探究式教学活动与学生成绩、兴趣和乐趣之间的关系。就学生的兴趣和乐趣而言,分析结果显示,大多数不同的探究式教学活动与学生较多接触这些活动之间存在着积极的关系。在学生成绩方面,我们的结果则更为复杂。例如,与在所有课程中都能解释自己的想法和观点或较少这样做的学生相比,在大多数课程中都能解释自己的想法和观点的学生的平均成绩最高。至于其他活动,如计划、实施和讨论实验和调查,当这些活动使用频率较低时,成绩也最高。这些结果使我们对国际学生评估项目(PISA)数据中学生如何看待探究式教学活动、学生成绩以及对科学的兴趣和喜爱之间关系的理解更加细致入微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Studies in Science Education
Nordic Studies in Science Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信