John J.-W. Yoo, Preamnath Balachandranath, Saeed Saboury
{"title":"Prerequisite knowledge-based automated course planning with semantics consideration","authors":"John J.-W. Yoo, Preamnath Balachandranath, Saeed Saboury","doi":"10.1002/cae.22748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The knowledge-based prerequisite framework (KPF) is an alternative to the course-based prerequisite framework (CPF), which is widely used for curriculum design. The KPF is more flexible because it only requires essential prerequisite knowledge, while the CPF is more rigid and requires students to take all prerequisite courses. Since the number of prerequisite knowledge terms is, in general, much greater than the number of prerequisite courses, flexibility can cause additional complexity. Furthermore, the KPF inevitably requires handling semantics of defined knowledge terms. This work presents a novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) Planning mathematical model that enables the KPF by automatically verifying prerequisite knowledge and incorporating hierarchical semantic relationships among knowledge terms into the model. The proposed model significantly improves the quality of course planning solutions by finding hidden or better solutions that could not be obtained without semantics consideration. The results of the comprehensive experiments show the optimality of the solutions obtained by the mathematical model and demonstrate the outperformance of incorporation of the semantics into the mathematical model, in terms of the quality of solutions. Finally, the experimental results on scalability show the necessity of the development of efficient heuristic algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The knowledge-based prerequisite framework (KPF) is an alternative to the course-based prerequisite framework (CPF), which is widely used for curriculum design. The KPF is more flexible because it only requires essential prerequisite knowledge, while the CPF is more rigid and requires students to take all prerequisite courses. Since the number of prerequisite knowledge terms is, in general, much greater than the number of prerequisite courses, flexibility can cause additional complexity. Furthermore, the KPF inevitably requires handling semantics of defined knowledge terms. This work presents a novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) Planning mathematical model that enables the KPF by automatically verifying prerequisite knowledge and incorporating hierarchical semantic relationships among knowledge terms into the model. The proposed model significantly improves the quality of course planning solutions by finding hidden or better solutions that could not be obtained without semantics consideration. The results of the comprehensive experiments show the optimality of the solutions obtained by the mathematical model and demonstrate the outperformance of incorporation of the semantics into the mathematical model, in terms of the quality of solutions. Finally, the experimental results on scalability show the necessity of the development of efficient heuristic algorithms.
期刊介绍:
Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.