Robustness of business models for insect production for feed and food in Europe

H. Niyonsaba, J. Höhler, B. Rumpold, H. van der Fels-Klerx, M.P.M. Meuwissen
{"title":"Robustness of business models for insect production for feed and food in Europe","authors":"H. Niyonsaba, J. Höhler, B. Rumpold, H. van der Fels-Klerx, M.P.M. Meuwissen","doi":"10.1163/23524588-00001141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nInsects and their derivatives are increasingly recognised as a (more) sustainable and circular protein source for feed and food. The European insect industry is growing, but upscaling remains a challenge due to multiple uncertainties. This study analysed the robustness of three different business models for insect production for feed and food in six future scenarios. Business models and scenarios were identified through literature review and refined through expert elicitation (n = 5). The three business models comprised: (1) full-liner black soldier fly production for pet food, (2) decentralised black soldier fly production for aquafeed, and (3) mealworm processing cooperative for food. The six scenarios addressed uncertainties around the use of side streams, insect welfare, energy, and sustainability. We used the Business Model Stress Test in four focus groups with experts (n = 23) from six European countries. Heat maps for three distinct business models were presented, detailing the impacts of scenarios on business model components. Experts regarded full-liner black soldier fly production for pet food and mealworm processing cooperative for food as more robust than decentralised black soldier fly production for aquafeed. These differences were mainly related to the customer segments, value proposition, revenue structure, and cost structure. In full-liner black soldier fly production for pet food, stringent regulations were expected to have no negative impact on business model components, in contrast to liberal regulations with anticipated adverse effects. Examination of regulatory uncertainty indicated strict legislation’s advantageous expected impact on consumer trust in the pet food and food market. High energy prices were anticipated as a major challenge across all business models, while improved sustainability compliance was viewed positively. The classification in relatively more or less robust business models serves as a guide for business and policy in further developing the insect sector for feed and food in Europe.","PeriodicalId":509242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insects as Food and Feed","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insects as Food and Feed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23524588-00001141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insects and their derivatives are increasingly recognised as a (more) sustainable and circular protein source for feed and food. The European insect industry is growing, but upscaling remains a challenge due to multiple uncertainties. This study analysed the robustness of three different business models for insect production for feed and food in six future scenarios. Business models and scenarios were identified through literature review and refined through expert elicitation (n = 5). The three business models comprised: (1) full-liner black soldier fly production for pet food, (2) decentralised black soldier fly production for aquafeed, and (3) mealworm processing cooperative for food. The six scenarios addressed uncertainties around the use of side streams, insect welfare, energy, and sustainability. We used the Business Model Stress Test in four focus groups with experts (n = 23) from six European countries. Heat maps for three distinct business models were presented, detailing the impacts of scenarios on business model components. Experts regarded full-liner black soldier fly production for pet food and mealworm processing cooperative for food as more robust than decentralised black soldier fly production for aquafeed. These differences were mainly related to the customer segments, value proposition, revenue structure, and cost structure. In full-liner black soldier fly production for pet food, stringent regulations were expected to have no negative impact on business model components, in contrast to liberal regulations with anticipated adverse effects. Examination of regulatory uncertainty indicated strict legislation’s advantageous expected impact on consumer trust in the pet food and food market. High energy prices were anticipated as a major challenge across all business models, while improved sustainability compliance was viewed positively. The classification in relatively more or less robust business models serves as a guide for business and policy in further developing the insect sector for feed and food in Europe.
欧洲饲料和食品用昆虫生产商业模式的稳健性
昆虫及其衍生物越来越被认为是一种(更)可持续和可循环的饲料和食品蛋白质来源。欧洲昆虫产业正在不断发展,但由于存在多种不确定性,扩大规模仍是一项挑战。本研究分析了在六种未来情景下用于饲料和食品的昆虫生产的三种不同商业模式的稳健性。通过文献综述确定了商业模式和情景,并通过专家征询(n = 5)对其进行了完善。三种商业模式包括:(1) 用于宠物食品的全线黑飞虱生产,(2) 用于水产饲料的分散黑飞虱生产,以及 (3) 用于食品的黄粉虫加工合作社。这六种情景涉及副流的使用、昆虫福利、能源和可持续性等方面的不确定性。我们在四个焦点小组中使用了商业模式压力测试,小组成员包括来自六个欧洲国家的专家(n = 23)。会上展示了三种不同商业模式的热图,详细说明了各种情景对商业模式组成部分的影响。专家们认为,用于宠物食品的全线黑飞虱生产和用于食品的黄粉虫加工合作社比用于水产饲料的分散黑飞虱生产更稳健。这些差异主要与客户群、价值主张、收入结构和成本结构有关。在用于宠物食品的全线黑飞虱生产中,严格的法规预计不会对商业模式的组成部分产生负面影响,而宽松的法规预计会产生不利影响。对法规不确定性的研究表明,严格的法规预计会对消费者对宠物食品和食品市场的信任度产生有利影响。高能源价格被认为是所有商业模式面临的主要挑战,而可持续发展合规性的提高则被认为是积极的。商业模式的强弱分类为企业和政策进一步发展欧洲昆虫饲料和食品行业提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信