Systematic investigation of nucleon optical model potentials in (p, d) transfer reactions

Silu Chen, Zixuan Liu, Zhi Zhang, ruirui xu, D. Pang, Y. Xu
{"title":"Systematic investigation of nucleon optical model potentials in (p, d) transfer reactions","authors":"Silu Chen, Zixuan Liu, Zhi Zhang, ruirui xu, D. Pang, Y. Xu","doi":"10.1088/1674-1137/ad4269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The consistent three-body model reaction methodology(TBMRM) proposed by J. Lee et al.[1–3], which includes adopting the simple zero-range adiabatic wave approximation, constraining the single-particle potentials using modern Hartree–Fock calculations, and using global nucleon optical model potential(OMP) geometries, are widely applied in systematic studies of transfer reactions. In this work, we study the influences of different nucleon OMPs on extraction of spectroscopic factors(SFs) from (p, d) reactions. Our study covers 32 sets of angular distribution data of (p, d) reactions on 4 targets, as well as a large range of incident energies(20-200 MeV/nucleon). Two semi-microscopic nucleon OMPs, JLM[4, 5] and CTOM[6], and a pure microscopic nucleon potential WLH[7] are used in the present work. The results are compared with those using the phenomenological global optical potential KD02[8]. We find the incident energy dependence of spectroscopic factors extracted from (p, d) reactions is obviously suppressed when microscopic OMPs are employed for 12C, 28Si and 40Ca. In addition, spectroscopic factors extracted using the systematic microscopic optical potential CTOM based on the Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory are more in line with the results obtained from (e, e'p) measurements, except 16O and 40Ca at high energies(> 100 MeV), calling for an exact treatment of double-magic nuclei. The results obtained by using pure microscopic optical potential WLH based on EFT theory shows the same trend but generally higher than CTOM. JLM potential, which relies on simplified nuclear matter calculations with old-fashioned bare interactions, produces very similar results with phenomenological potential KD02. Our results indicate that modern microscopic OMPs are reliable tools for probing the nuclear structure by transfer reactions across a wide energy range.","PeriodicalId":504778,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Physics C","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Physics C","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ad4269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The consistent three-body model reaction methodology(TBMRM) proposed by J. Lee et al.[1–3], which includes adopting the simple zero-range adiabatic wave approximation, constraining the single-particle potentials using modern Hartree–Fock calculations, and using global nucleon optical model potential(OMP) geometries, are widely applied in systematic studies of transfer reactions. In this work, we study the influences of different nucleon OMPs on extraction of spectroscopic factors(SFs) from (p, d) reactions. Our study covers 32 sets of angular distribution data of (p, d) reactions on 4 targets, as well as a large range of incident energies(20-200 MeV/nucleon). Two semi-microscopic nucleon OMPs, JLM[4, 5] and CTOM[6], and a pure microscopic nucleon potential WLH[7] are used in the present work. The results are compared with those using the phenomenological global optical potential KD02[8]. We find the incident energy dependence of spectroscopic factors extracted from (p, d) reactions is obviously suppressed when microscopic OMPs are employed for 12C, 28Si and 40Ca. In addition, spectroscopic factors extracted using the systematic microscopic optical potential CTOM based on the Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory are more in line with the results obtained from (e, e'p) measurements, except 16O and 40Ca at high energies(> 100 MeV), calling for an exact treatment of double-magic nuclei. The results obtained by using pure microscopic optical potential WLH based on EFT theory shows the same trend but generally higher than CTOM. JLM potential, which relies on simplified nuclear matter calculations with old-fashioned bare interactions, produces very similar results with phenomenological potential KD02. Our results indicate that modern microscopic OMPs are reliable tools for probing the nuclear structure by transfer reactions across a wide energy range.
对(p, d)转移反应中核子光学模型势的系统研究
J. Lee 等人[1-3]提出的一致三体模型反应方法(TBMRM),包括采用简单的零程绝热波近似、利用现代哈特里-福克计算约束单粒子势和使用全局核子光学模型势(OMP)几何结构,被广泛应用于转移反应的系统研究。在这项工作中,我们研究了不同核子光学模型势对从(p,d)反应中提取光谱因子(SFs)的影响。我们的研究涵盖了 4 个靶上 32 组(p, d)反应的角分布数据,以及很大的入射能量范围(20-200 MeV/核子)。本研究使用了两个半微观核子 OMP,JLM[4, 5] 和 CTOM[6],以及一个纯微观核子势 WLH[7]。结果与使用现象学全局光学势 KD02[8] 的结果进行了比较。我们发现,当对 12C、28Si 和 40Ca 采用微观光学势时,从(p, d)反应中提取的光谱因子的入射能量依赖性被明显抑制。此外,使用基于 Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock 理论的系统微观光学势 CTOM 提取的光谱因子与(e,e'p)测量结果更为一致,但 16O 和 40Ca 在高能量(> 100 MeV)时除外,这就要求对双魔核进行精确处理。使用基于 EFT 理论的纯微观光学势 WLH 得到的结果显示出相同的趋势,但普遍高于 CTOM。JLM 势依赖于老式裸相互作用的简化核物质计算,其结果与现象势 KD02 非常相似。我们的研究结果表明,现代微观 OMP 是在宽能量范围内通过转移反应探测核结构的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信