Considerations for the static and seismic design of pumped storage reservoirs in soft soils and seismic environments

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Manfred Scheikl
{"title":"Considerations for the static and seismic design of pumped storage reservoirs in soft soils and seismic environments","authors":"Manfred Scheikl","doi":"10.1002/geot.202400006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For recent hydroelectric pumped storage projects, the construction of embankment dam structures on alluvial deposits consisting of exceptionally soft soil and in areas with high seismicity was required. This contribution shares experiences and challenges from the static and seismic design of embankment dam structures and ground treatment options. Finite element-based static and seismic analyses using the Hardening Soil Small Strain model (HSS) showed that preconsolidation has clear benefits compared to stone columns for ground improvement purposes. Regardless of general advantages of surface sealing systems for frequent and rapid impoundment level changes, it was found that clay core design options perform very well under seismic loading conditions and even better than surface-sealed structures. Seismic ground and structure response analyses involving soft soil considering shear strain-dependent stiffness degradation revealed that deamplification is expected in contrast to the rule-of-thumb amplification approaches enshrined in many seismic design guidelines and codes. It was found that this effect increases with seismic magnitudes and that saturation of peak ground acceleration (PGA) takes place. This results in relatively moderate structure excitations even under significant dynamic excitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39412,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanik und Tunnelbau","volume":"17 3","pages":"212-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanik und Tunnelbau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geot.202400006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For recent hydroelectric pumped storage projects, the construction of embankment dam structures on alluvial deposits consisting of exceptionally soft soil and in areas with high seismicity was required. This contribution shares experiences and challenges from the static and seismic design of embankment dam structures and ground treatment options. Finite element-based static and seismic analyses using the Hardening Soil Small Strain model (HSS) showed that preconsolidation has clear benefits compared to stone columns for ground improvement purposes. Regardless of general advantages of surface sealing systems for frequent and rapid impoundment level changes, it was found that clay core design options perform very well under seismic loading conditions and even better than surface-sealed structures. Seismic ground and structure response analyses involving soft soil considering shear strain-dependent stiffness degradation revealed that deamplification is expected in contrast to the rule-of-thumb amplification approaches enshrined in many seismic design guidelines and codes. It was found that this effect increases with seismic magnitudes and that saturation of peak ground acceleration (PGA) takes place. This results in relatively moderate structure excitations even under significant dynamic excitation.

软土和地震环境中抽水蓄能水库的静态和抗震设计考虑因素
在近期的水电抽水蓄能项目中,需要在由特别松软的土壤组成的冲积层和地震高发区建造堤坝结构。本文分享了堤坝结构静力和抗震设计以及地基处理方案方面的经验和挑战。使用硬化土小应变模型(HSS)进行的基于有限元的静力和地震分析表明,在地基改良方面,预固结与石柱相比具有明显优势。尽管地表密封系统在频繁和快速的蓄水池水位变化方面具有一般优势,但研究发现,粘土岩芯设计方案在地震荷载条件下表现非常出色,甚至优于地表密封结构。涉及软土的地震地面和结构响应分析考虑了剪切应变相关的刚度退化,结果表明,与许多地震设计指南和规范中的经验放大法相反,预计会出现去放大效应。研究发现,这种效应随着地震震级的增加而增加,地面峰值加速度(PGA)达到饱和。这导致即使在巨大的动态激励下,结构激励也相对温和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomechanik und Tunnelbau
Geomechanik und Tunnelbau Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: The contributions published in Geomechanics and Tunnelling deal with practical aspects of applied engineering geology, rock mechanics and rock engineering, soil mechanics and foundation engineering, and primarily tunnelling. Each issue focuses on a current topic or specific project. Brief news, reports from construction sites and news on conferences round off the content. From the start of 2009 Geomechanics and Tunnelling has been published as a bilingual English/German journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信