Prediction of physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of botanical constituents by computational models

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Yitong Liu, Michael Lawless, Miao Li, Kiara Fairman, Michelle R. Embry, Constance A. Mitchell
{"title":"Prediction of physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of botanical constituents by computational models","authors":"Yitong Liu,&nbsp;Michael Lawless,&nbsp;Miao Li,&nbsp;Kiara Fairman,&nbsp;Michelle R. Embry,&nbsp;Constance A. Mitchell","doi":"10.1002/jat.4617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Botanicals contain complex mixtures of chemicals most of which lack pharmacokinetic data in humans. Since physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties dictate the in vivo exposure of botanical constituents, these parameters greatly impact the pharmacological and toxicological effects of botanicals in consumer products. This study sought to use computational (i.e., in silico) models, including quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, to predict properties of botanical constituents. One hundred and three major constituents (e.g., withanolides, mitragynine, and yohimbine) in 13 botanicals (e.g., ashwagandha, kratom, and yohimbe) were investigated. The predicted properties included biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) classes based on aqueous solubility and permeability, oral absorption, liver microsomal clearance, oral bioavailability, and others. Over half of these constituents fell into BCS classes I and II at dose levels no greater than 100 mg per day, indicating high permeability and absorption (%F<sub>a</sub> &gt; 75%) in the gastrointestinal tract. However, some constituents such as glycosides in ashwagandha and Asian ginseng showed low bioavailability after oral administration due to poor absorption (BCS classes III and IV, %F<sub>a</sub> &lt; 40%). These in silico results fill data gaps for botanical constituents and could guide future safety studies. For example, the predicted human plasma concentrations may help select concentrations for in vitro toxicity testing. Additionally, the in silico data could be used in tiered or batteries of assays to assess the safety of botanical products. For example, highly absorbed botanical constituents indicate potential high exposure in the body, which could lead to toxic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","volume":"44 8","pages":"1236-1245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jat.4617","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jat.4617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Botanicals contain complex mixtures of chemicals most of which lack pharmacokinetic data in humans. Since physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties dictate the in vivo exposure of botanical constituents, these parameters greatly impact the pharmacological and toxicological effects of botanicals in consumer products. This study sought to use computational (i.e., in silico) models, including quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, to predict properties of botanical constituents. One hundred and three major constituents (e.g., withanolides, mitragynine, and yohimbine) in 13 botanicals (e.g., ashwagandha, kratom, and yohimbe) were investigated. The predicted properties included biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) classes based on aqueous solubility and permeability, oral absorption, liver microsomal clearance, oral bioavailability, and others. Over half of these constituents fell into BCS classes I and II at dose levels no greater than 100 mg per day, indicating high permeability and absorption (%Fa > 75%) in the gastrointestinal tract. However, some constituents such as glycosides in ashwagandha and Asian ginseng showed low bioavailability after oral administration due to poor absorption (BCS classes III and IV, %Fa < 40%). These in silico results fill data gaps for botanical constituents and could guide future safety studies. For example, the predicted human plasma concentrations may help select concentrations for in vitro toxicity testing. Additionally, the in silico data could be used in tiered or batteries of assays to assess the safety of botanical products. For example, highly absorbed botanical constituents indicate potential high exposure in the body, which could lead to toxic effects.

Abstract Image

通过计算模型预测植物成分的理化和药代动力学特性。
植物药含有复杂的化学混合物,其中大部分缺乏人体药代动力学数据。由于理化和药代动力学特性决定了植物成分的体内暴露量,因此这些参数对消费品中植物成分的药理和毒理效应有很大影响。本研究试图利用计算模型(即硅学模型),包括定量结构-活性关系(QSAR)和生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型,来预测植物成分的特性。研究了 13 种植物药(如灰树精、桔梗和育亨宾)中的 103 种主要成分(如黄烷醇内酯、米曲金宁和育亨宾)。预测的特性包括基于水溶性和渗透性、口服吸收、肝微粒体清除率、口服生物利用度等的生物制药分类系统(BCS)类别。在每天剂量不超过 100 毫克的情况下,这些成分中有一半以上属于 BCS I 级和 II 级,这表明它们在胃肠道中的渗透性和吸收率较高(%Fa > 75%)。然而,灰树花和亚洲人参中的苷类等一些成分由于吸收率低(BCS III 级和 IV 级,%Fa < 40%),口服后的生物利用度较低。这些硅学结果填补了植物成分的数据空白,可为未来的安全性研究提供指导。例如,预测的人体血浆浓度可能有助于选择体外毒性测试的浓度。此外,硅学数据还可用于分层或成组检测,以评估植物产品的安全性。例如,高吸收率的植物成分表明体内潜在的高暴露量,这可能会导致毒性效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
145
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed original reviews and hypothesis-driven research articles on mechanistic, fundamental and applied research relating to the toxicity of drugs and chemicals at the molecular, cellular, tissue, target organ and whole body level in vivo (by all relevant routes of exposure) and in vitro / ex vivo. All aspects of toxicology are covered (including but not limited to nanotoxicology, genomics and proteomics, teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, reproductive and endocrine toxicology, toxicopathology, target organ toxicity, systems toxicity (eg immunotoxicity), neurobehavioral toxicology, mechanistic studies, biochemical and molecular toxicology, novel biomarkers, pharmacokinetics/PBPK, risk assessment and environmental health studies) and emphasis is given to papers of clear application to human health, and/or advance mechanistic understanding and/or provide significant contributions and impact to their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信