Great Debates: Surgery or Watch and Wait After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer.

Ayaa Ali, Wang Fai Lee, Michael P O'Leary, Matthew D. Whealon
{"title":"Great Debates: Surgery or Watch and Wait After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Ayaa Ali, Wang Fai Lee, Michael P O'Leary, Matthew D. Whealon","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locally advanced rectal cancer has traditionally been treated with multimodal therapy including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection. More recent data suggests that in appropriate patients, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) makes it possible to adopt a \"watch and wait\" approach. Advocates for watch and wait argue that patients with a complete or near-complete clinical response to TNT have comparable overall and disease-free survival to their counterparts who undergo surgical resection, and also have a better quality of life, fewer complications, and potentially avoid a stoma. The dogma of surgery as regional curative intent therapy has been challenged by similar recurrence rates among those treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) and those treated with watch and wait. Furthermore, those who develop local recurrence in the watch and wait groups are equally salvageable, either by surgery, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy. While watch and wait is not appropriate in all patients, this manuscript highlights the benefits and drawbacks of both therapeutic modalities.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":"32 1","pages":"31348241248812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Locally advanced rectal cancer has traditionally been treated with multimodal therapy including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection. More recent data suggests that in appropriate patients, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) makes it possible to adopt a "watch and wait" approach. Advocates for watch and wait argue that patients with a complete or near-complete clinical response to TNT have comparable overall and disease-free survival to their counterparts who undergo surgical resection, and also have a better quality of life, fewer complications, and potentially avoid a stoma. The dogma of surgery as regional curative intent therapy has been challenged by similar recurrence rates among those treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) and those treated with watch and wait. Furthermore, those who develop local recurrence in the watch and wait groups are equally salvageable, either by surgery, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy. While watch and wait is not appropriate in all patients, this manuscript highlights the benefits and drawbacks of both therapeutic modalities.
大辩论:直肠癌完全新辅助治疗后,手术还是观察等待?
局部晚期直肠癌传统上采用多模式治疗,包括新辅助化放疗和手术切除。最近的数据表明,对于合适的患者,完全新辅助治疗(TNT)使 "观察和等待 "成为可能。主张 "观察和等待 "的人认为,对 TNT 完全或接近完全临床反应的患者,其总生存期和无病生存期与接受手术切除的患者相当,而且生活质量更高、并发症更少,并有可能避免造口。手术作为区域根治性治疗的教条受到了挑战,因为接受全直肠系膜切除术(TME)治疗的患者和接受观察和等待治疗的患者的复发率相似。此外,观察和等待组中出现局部复发的患者同样可以通过手术、近距离放疗或化疗进行挽救。虽然观察和等待并非适用于所有患者,但本手稿强调了这两种治疗方式的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信