Do Managerial and institutional Ownership, Company Growth and Size effect on Debt Policy?

Dian Rivani, Muhammad Ghazali, Dinda Oktavia
{"title":"Do Managerial and institutional Ownership, Company Growth and Size effect on Debt Policy?","authors":"Dian Rivani, Muhammad Ghazali, Dinda Oktavia","doi":"10.58777/rfb.v2i1.214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to examine the influence of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, company growth, and company size on debt policy. This research uses descriptive quantitative type. This research uses a population of food and beverage sub-sector manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2017-2021. The sampling technique in this research was purposive sampling, and a sample of 7 companies was obtained. This research uses secondary data, namely annual financial reports obtained from the official website of the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). The analytical method used is multiple regression analysis. The research results show that managerial ownership, institutional ownership, company growth, and company size do not affect debt policy. Managerial implications. Firstly, discuss implications related to managerial ownership. Second, discuss implications related to institutional ownership. Thirdly, discuss implications related to company growth. Lastly, discuss implications related to company size. Understanding these implications can aid managers in formulating effective debt policies to optimize firm performance and mitigate financial risks. Further research avenues are also suggested to deepen the understanding of these dynamics. They need to understand the risks and potential benefits of using debt, as well as consider external factors such as market conditions and regulations.","PeriodicalId":474596,"journal":{"name":"Research of Finance and Banking","volume":"56 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research of Finance and Banking","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58777/rfb.v2i1.214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to examine the influence of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, company growth, and company size on debt policy. This research uses descriptive quantitative type. This research uses a population of food and beverage sub-sector manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2017-2021. The sampling technique in this research was purposive sampling, and a sample of 7 companies was obtained. This research uses secondary data, namely annual financial reports obtained from the official website of the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). The analytical method used is multiple regression analysis. The research results show that managerial ownership, institutional ownership, company growth, and company size do not affect debt policy. Managerial implications. Firstly, discuss implications related to managerial ownership. Second, discuss implications related to institutional ownership. Thirdly, discuss implications related to company growth. Lastly, discuss implications related to company size. Understanding these implications can aid managers in formulating effective debt policies to optimize firm performance and mitigate financial risks. Further research avenues are also suggested to deepen the understanding of these dynamics. They need to understand the risks and potential benefits of using debt, as well as consider external factors such as market conditions and regulations.
管理层和机构所有制、公司成长性和规模对债务政策有影响吗?
本研究旨在探讨管理所有权、机构所有权、公司成长性和公司规模对债务政策的影响。本研究采用描述性定量研究方法。本研究以 2017-2021 年在印尼证券交易所(BEI)上市的食品饮料子行业制造业公司为研究对象。本研究的抽样技术为目的性抽样,共获得 7 家公司样本。本研究使用的是二手数据,即从印尼证券交易所(IDX)官网获取的年度财务报告。使用的分析方法是多元回归分析。研究结果表明,管理者所有权、机构所有权、公司成长性和公司规模并不影响债务政策。对管理者的启示。首先,讨论与管理者所有权相关的影响。第二,讨论与机构所有权相关的影响。第三,讨论与公司成长相关的影响。最后,讨论与公司规模相关的影响。了解这些影响有助于管理者制定有效的债务政策,优化公司业绩并降低财务风险。我们还建议进一步开展研究,以加深对这些动态的理解。他们需要了解使用债务的风险和潜在收益,并考虑市场条件和法规等外部因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信