Pediatric anesthesia in Australia and New Zealand and health inequity among First Nations and Māori children.

Edith Waugh, Jane M Thomas, B. Anderson, Paul F Lee-Archer
{"title":"Pediatric anesthesia in Australia and New Zealand and health inequity among First Nations and Māori children.","authors":"Edith Waugh, Jane M Thomas, B. Anderson, Paul F Lee-Archer","doi":"10.1111/pan.14898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australia and New Zealand are two countries in the Southern Pacific region. They share many pediatric anesthesia similarities in terms of medical organizational systems, education, training, and research, however there are important differences between the two nations in relation to geography, the First Nations populations and the history of colonization. While the standards for pediatric anesthesia and the specialty training requirements are set by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anesthetists and the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia in New Zealand and Australia, colonization has created distinct challenges that each nation now faces in order to improve the anesthetic care of its pediatric population. Australia generally has a high standard of living and good access to health care; disparities exist for First Nations People and for those living in rural or remote areas. Two influences have shaped training within New Zealand over the past 40 years; establishment of a national children's hospital in 1990 and, more importantly, acknowledgement that the First Nations people of New Zealand (Māori) have suffered because of failure to recognize their rights consequent to establishing a partnership treaty between Māori and the British Crown in 1840. Health inequities among Māori in New Zealand and First Nations People in Australia have implications for the health system, culturally appropriate approaches to treatment, and the importance of having an appreciation of First Nations people's history and culture, language, family structure, and cultural safety. Trainees in both countries need to be adequately supported in these areas in order for the sub-specialty of pediatric anesthesia to develop further and improve the anesthetic and surgical outcomes of our children.","PeriodicalId":281130,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric anaesthesia","volume":"5 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Australia and New Zealand are two countries in the Southern Pacific region. They share many pediatric anesthesia similarities in terms of medical organizational systems, education, training, and research, however there are important differences between the two nations in relation to geography, the First Nations populations and the history of colonization. While the standards for pediatric anesthesia and the specialty training requirements are set by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anesthetists and the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia in New Zealand and Australia, colonization has created distinct challenges that each nation now faces in order to improve the anesthetic care of its pediatric population. Australia generally has a high standard of living and good access to health care; disparities exist for First Nations People and for those living in rural or remote areas. Two influences have shaped training within New Zealand over the past 40 years; establishment of a national children's hospital in 1990 and, more importantly, acknowledgement that the First Nations people of New Zealand (Māori) have suffered because of failure to recognize their rights consequent to establishing a partnership treaty between Māori and the British Crown in 1840. Health inequities among Māori in New Zealand and First Nations People in Australia have implications for the health system, culturally appropriate approaches to treatment, and the importance of having an appreciation of First Nations people's history and culture, language, family structure, and cultural safety. Trainees in both countries need to be adequately supported in these areas in order for the sub-specialty of pediatric anesthesia to develop further and improve the anesthetic and surgical outcomes of our children.
澳大利亚和新西兰的儿科麻醉与原住民和毛利儿童的健康不平等。
澳大利亚和新西兰是南太平洋地区的两个国家。两国在医疗组织系统、教育、培训和研究方面有许多相似之处,但在地理位置、原住民人口和殖民历史等方面存在重要差异。虽然儿科麻醉的标准和专业培训要求是由澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉师学院以及新西兰和澳大利亚儿科麻醉学会制定的,但殖民地化造成了不同的挑战,每个国家现在都面临着改善儿科麻醉护理的挑战。澳大利亚的生活水平普遍较高,医疗保健服务也很完善;但原住民以及居住在农村或偏远地区的人们的医疗保健服务却存在差距。在过去的40年中,有两个因素对新西兰的培训产生了影响:1990年建立了一所国家儿童医院;更重要的是,新西兰承认新西兰原住民(毛利人)因1840年毛利人与英国王室签订合作条约后其权利未得到承认而遭受了苦难。新西兰毛利人和澳大利亚原住民在健康方面的不平等对医疗系统、文化适宜的治疗方法以及了解原住民的历史和文化、语言、家庭结构和文化安全的重要性都有影响。这两个国家的受训人员需要在这些方面得到充分的支持,以便小儿麻醉亚专科进一步发展,改善儿童的麻醉和手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信