Preoperative prediction of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma using clinical, genetic, and biochemical markers: A cohort study

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Seung Shin Park, Chang Ho Ahn, Seunghoo Lee, Woochang Lee, Won Woong Kim, Yu-Mi Lee, Su Jin Kim, Tae-Yon Sung, Kyu Eun Lee, Jung Hee Kim, Seung Hun Lee, Jung-Min Koh
{"title":"Preoperative prediction of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma using clinical, genetic, and biochemical markers: A cohort study","authors":"Seung Shin Park,&nbsp;Chang Ho Ahn,&nbsp;Seunghoo Lee,&nbsp;Woochang Lee,&nbsp;Won Woong Kim,&nbsp;Yu-Mi Lee,&nbsp;Su Jin Kim,&nbsp;Tae-Yon Sung,&nbsp;Kyu Eun Lee,&nbsp;Jung Hee Kim,&nbsp;Seung Hun Lee,&nbsp;Jung-Min Koh","doi":"10.1111/joim.13791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) is approximately 15%–20%. Although there are indicators to assess metastatic risks, none of them predict metastasis reliably. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a scoring system using clinical, genetic, and biochemical risk factors to preoperatively predict the metastatic risk of PPGL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In the cross-sectional cohort (<i>n</i> = 180), clinical, genetic, and biochemical risk factors for metastasis were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a novel scoring system was developed. The scoring system was validated and compared with the age, size of tumor, extra-adrenal location, and secretory type (ASES) score in the longitudinal cohort (<i>n</i> = 114).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the cross-sectional cohort, pseudohypoxia group-related gene variants (<i>SDHB</i>, <i>SDHD</i>, or <i>VHL</i>), methoxytyramine &gt;0.16 nmol/L, and tumor size &gt;6.0 cm were independently associated with metastasis after multivariate logistic regression. Using them, the gene variant, methoxytyramine, and size of tumor (GMS) score were developed. In the longitudinal cohort, Harrell's concordance index of the GMS score (0.873, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.738–0.941) was higher than that of the ASES score (0.713, 95% CI: 0.567–0.814, <i>p</i> = 0.007). In the longitudinal cohort, a GMS score ≥2 was significantly associated with a higher risk of metastasis (hazard ratio = 25.07, 95% CI: 5.65–111.20). A GMS score ≥2 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), but not ASES score ≥2 (<i>p</i> = 0.090), was associated with shorter progression-free survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The GMS scoring system, which integrates gene variant, methoxytyramine level, and tumor size, provides a valuable preoperative approach to assess metastatic risk in PPGL.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"296 1","pages":"68-79"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.13791","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.13791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) is approximately 15%–20%. Although there are indicators to assess metastatic risks, none of them predict metastasis reliably. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a scoring system using clinical, genetic, and biochemical risk factors to preoperatively predict the metastatic risk of PPGL.

Methods

In the cross-sectional cohort (n = 180), clinical, genetic, and biochemical risk factors for metastasis were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a novel scoring system was developed. The scoring system was validated and compared with the age, size of tumor, extra-adrenal location, and secretory type (ASES) score in the longitudinal cohort (n = 114).

Results

In the cross-sectional cohort, pseudohypoxia group-related gene variants (SDHB, SDHD, or VHL), methoxytyramine >0.16 nmol/L, and tumor size >6.0 cm were independently associated with metastasis after multivariate logistic regression. Using them, the gene variant, methoxytyramine, and size of tumor (GMS) score were developed. In the longitudinal cohort, Harrell's concordance index of the GMS score (0.873, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.738–0.941) was higher than that of the ASES score (0.713, 95% CI: 0.567–0.814, p = 0.007). In the longitudinal cohort, a GMS score ≥2 was significantly associated with a higher risk of metastasis (hazard ratio = 25.07, 95% CI: 5.65–111.20). A GMS score ≥2 (p < 0.001), but not ASES score ≥2 (p = 0.090), was associated with shorter progression-free survival.

Conclusion

The GMS scoring system, which integrates gene variant, methoxytyramine level, and tumor size, provides a valuable preoperative approach to assess metastatic risk in PPGL.

Abstract Image

利用临床、遗传和生化标记对转移性嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤进行术前预测:一项队列研究。
背景转移性嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤(PPGL)的发病率约为 15%-20%。虽然有一些评估转移风险的指标,但它们都不能可靠地预测转移。方法在横断面队列(n = 180)中,使用多变量逻辑回归分析确定了转移的临床、遗传和生化风险因素,并建立了一个新的评分系统。结果在横断面队列中,假缺氧组相关基因变异(SDHB、SDHD或VHL)、甲氧基酪胺>0.16 nmol/L和肿瘤大小>6.0 cm与多变量逻辑回归后的转移独立相关。利用这些因素制定了基因变异、甲氧基酪胺和肿瘤大小(GMS)评分。在纵向队列中,GMS 评分的 Harrell 一致性指数(0.873,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.738-0.941)高于 ASES 评分(0.713,95% CI:0.567-0.814,P = 0.007)。在纵向队列中,GMS评分≥2与较高的转移风险显著相关(危险比=25.07,95% CI:5.65-111.20)。结论GMS评分系统综合了基因变异、甲氧基酪胺水平和肿瘤大小,为评估PPGL的转移风险提供了一种有价值的术前方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Internal Medicine
Journal of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JIM – The Journal of Internal Medicine, in continuous publication since 1863, is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original work in clinical science, spanning from bench to bedside, encompassing a wide range of internal medicine and its subspecialties. JIM showcases original articles, reviews, brief reports, and research letters in the field of internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信