Exploring shoulder joint pain: a comparative analysis of dynamic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging

Sparsh Varma, Praveen K Sharma, Afwaan Faizal, Ajay Lucas
{"title":"Exploring shoulder joint pain: a comparative analysis of dynamic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging","authors":"Sparsh Varma, Praveen K Sharma, Afwaan Faizal, Ajay Lucas","doi":"10.17816/vto626367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: To evaluate shoulder joint pain, the study concentrated on evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. \nAIM: By comparing the results from both modalities within the same patient group, the study aimed to identify potential challenges in image interpretation, underscoring the limitations of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with shoulder joint pain were included through purposive sampling. These patients underwent ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, and the results were correlated. Various shoulder pathologies, including tendon tears, bursitis, degenerative changes, calcifications, and impingement, were analyzed. \nRESULTS: The study comprised 35 patients who underwent ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging detecting pathologies such as subscapularis and supraspinatus tendon injuries, partial and full-thickness tears, peribicipital tendon fluid, subcoracoid and subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis, acromioclavicular joint degeneration, tendon calcification, and impingement. Comparative analysis showed varying sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and accuracy for different pathologies. \nCONCLUSION: Compared with ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity in identifying conditions causing shoulder pain. Ultrasonography’s affordability, real-time capabilities, and ability to compare results with the unaffected side make it a useful first diagnostic step for shoulder pain. Ultrasonography, although a quick and cost-effective initial diagnostic tool, has limitations, including operator dependence and lower sensitivity in certain conditions. In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging is employed as a confirming measure or in instances where diagnosis is challenging. The study emphasized the complementary roles of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of shoulder joint pain, with magnetic resonance imaging as the more accurate and complete imaging modality.","PeriodicalId":308632,"journal":{"name":"N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics","volume":"36 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/vto626367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate shoulder joint pain, the study concentrated on evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. AIM: By comparing the results from both modalities within the same patient group, the study aimed to identify potential challenges in image interpretation, underscoring the limitations of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with shoulder joint pain were included through purposive sampling. These patients underwent ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, and the results were correlated. Various shoulder pathologies, including tendon tears, bursitis, degenerative changes, calcifications, and impingement, were analyzed. RESULTS: The study comprised 35 patients who underwent ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging detecting pathologies such as subscapularis and supraspinatus tendon injuries, partial and full-thickness tears, peribicipital tendon fluid, subcoracoid and subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis, acromioclavicular joint degeneration, tendon calcification, and impingement. Comparative analysis showed varying sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and accuracy for different pathologies. CONCLUSION: Compared with ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity in identifying conditions causing shoulder pain. Ultrasonography’s affordability, real-time capabilities, and ability to compare results with the unaffected side make it a useful first diagnostic step for shoulder pain. Ultrasonography, although a quick and cost-effective initial diagnostic tool, has limitations, including operator dependence and lower sensitivity in certain conditions. In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging is employed as a confirming measure or in instances where diagnosis is challenging. The study emphasized the complementary roles of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of shoulder joint pain, with magnetic resonance imaging as the more accurate and complete imaging modality.
探究肩关节疼痛:动态超声波和磁共振成像的对比分析
背景:为评估肩关节疼痛,该研究重点评估了超声波和磁共振成像的诊断准确性。目的:通过比较同一患者组中两种模式的结果,该研究旨在找出图像解读中的潜在挑战,强调超声波和磁共振成像的局限性。材料与方法:通过有目的的抽样纳入了肩关节疼痛患者。这些患者接受了超声波和磁共振成像检查,并将检查结果进行了关联。分析了各种肩部病变,包括肌腱撕裂、滑囊炎、退行性病变、钙化和撞击。结果:35 名患者接受了超声波和磁共振成像检查,发现了肩胛下肌腱和冈上肌腱损伤、部分和全厚撕裂、肱骨髁周肌腱积液、肩峰下和肩峰下-盾状滑囊炎、肩锁关节退变、肌腱钙化和撞击等病变。对比分析表明,不同病变的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性各不相同。结论:与超声波检查相比,磁共振成像在识别引起肩部疼痛的病症方面具有更高的灵敏度和特异性。超声波造影的经济性、实时性以及与未受影响侧的结果进行比较的能力使其成为诊断肩痛的第一步。超声波造影虽然是一种快速、经济的初步诊断工具,但也有其局限性,包括对操作者的依赖性以及在某些情况下灵敏度较低。相比之下,磁共振成像可作为确诊措施,或在诊断有困难的情况下使用。该研究强调了超声波和磁共振成像在诊断肩关节疼痛中的互补作用,其中磁共振成像是更准确、更全面的成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信