Ecologies of co-production in the Anthropocene

Elliot Honeybun-Arnolda, Martin Mahony, Jason Chilvers
{"title":"Ecologies of co-production in the Anthropocene","authors":"Elliot Honeybun-Arnolda, Martin Mahony, Jason Chilvers","doi":"10.1177/27539687241245427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The urgency, uncertainty and unevenness of the Anthropocene has foregrounded the spatial and temporal multiplicity of co-production between science and society. In this article, we draw together work in geography, science and technology studies and cognate disciplines concerned with ‘co-producing’ knowledge for environmental governance, and with the ‘co-production’ of science and politics. Yet these existing studies and approaches have tended to focus on discrete moments of co-production within bounded time-spaces. Building on work associated with ecologies of participation and geographies of science, we introduce the notion of ‘ecologies of co-production’ as a way to more faithfully attend to multiple co-existing co-productions and the interrelations between them. We define this as diverse interrelating practices and spaces of co-production which intermingle and are co-produced with(in) wider systems and political cultures in which they are situated. We set out how this opens up new ways of thinking about and attending to the spaces and interrelations, diversities and exclusions, histories and constitutions, and responsibilities and affects of co-productions between science and society in the Anthropocene. We suggest that this approach can make a difference in how we do co-production, how we analyse co-production and how we live, act and figure in an Anthropocene world.","PeriodicalId":498164,"journal":{"name":"Progress in environmental geography","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in environmental geography","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27539687241245427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The urgency, uncertainty and unevenness of the Anthropocene has foregrounded the spatial and temporal multiplicity of co-production between science and society. In this article, we draw together work in geography, science and technology studies and cognate disciplines concerned with ‘co-producing’ knowledge for environmental governance, and with the ‘co-production’ of science and politics. Yet these existing studies and approaches have tended to focus on discrete moments of co-production within bounded time-spaces. Building on work associated with ecologies of participation and geographies of science, we introduce the notion of ‘ecologies of co-production’ as a way to more faithfully attend to multiple co-existing co-productions and the interrelations between them. We define this as diverse interrelating practices and spaces of co-production which intermingle and are co-produced with(in) wider systems and political cultures in which they are situated. We set out how this opens up new ways of thinking about and attending to the spaces and interrelations, diversities and exclusions, histories and constitutions, and responsibilities and affects of co-productions between science and society in the Anthropocene. We suggest that this approach can make a difference in how we do co-production, how we analyse co-production and how we live, act and figure in an Anthropocene world.
人类世的共同生产生态学
人类世的紧迫性、不确定性和不均衡性凸显了科学与社会之间共同生产的时空多重性。在这篇文章中,我们汇集了地理学、科学与技术研究以及与环境治理 "共同生产 "知识和科学与政治 "共同生产 "相关的同源学科的研究成果。然而,这些现有的研究和方法往往关注的是在有限的时间空间内共同生产的离散时刻。在参与生态学和科学地理学相关工作的基础上,我们提出了 "共同生产生态学 "的概念,以此来更忠实地关注多种并存的共同生产及其之间的相互关系。我们将其定义为多种相互关联的共同生产实践和空间,这些实践和空间与它们所处的更广泛的系统和政治文化相互交融并共同生产。我们阐述了这如何为思考和关注人类世科学与社会之间共同生产的空间与相互关系、多样性与排斥、历史与构成、责任与影响开辟了新的途径。我们认为,这种方法可以改变我们的共同生产方式、共同生产分析方式以及我们在人类世世界中的生活、行动和形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信