Jeremy J. Pritt, Stephen M. Tyszko, Kevin S. Page, Joseph D. Conroy, R. D. Zweifel
{"title":"Effects of a minimum length limit on saugeye population and fishery characteristics in Ohio reservoirs","authors":"Jeremy J. Pritt, Stephen M. Tyszko, Kevin S. Page, Joseph D. Conroy, R. D. Zweifel","doi":"10.1002/nafm.11001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated the effect of a 381‐mm minimum length limit (MLL) on saugeye (female Walleye Sander vitreus × male Sauger S. canadensis) population and fishery characteristics implemented in Ohio reservoirs in 2011.Using a before‐after–control‐impact study design (n = 6 control populations and n = 11 impact populations that received the MLL), we compared total CPUE, age‐2+ CPUE, proportional stock density‐harvestable (381‐mm), and length at age 2 (to index growth) determined from standardized gill‐net surveys and saugeye angler effort, catch rate, harvest rate, length of saugeye at harvest, yield, and satisfaction obtained from standardized creel surveys.We found evidence that the 381‐mm MLL led to an increase in age‐2+ CPUE but had no effect on other saugeye population metrics. In the regulation reservoirs, harvest rates declined following MLL implementation. Total length of harvested saugeye did not increase significantly in response to the MLL, and combined with decreased harvest rates, yield was suppressed in the regulation reservoirs relative to the control reservoirs. However, over 90% of anglers reported that they were satisfied with the MLL during creel surveys.Despite marginal influence on saugeye populations and failure to increase yield, anglers supported the MLL. Our results suggest that the effects of harvest regulations may be marginal, and managers should consider the nuances of angler satisfaction in regulation decisions.","PeriodicalId":19263,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.11001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We evaluated the effect of a 381‐mm minimum length limit (MLL) on saugeye (female Walleye Sander vitreus × male Sauger S. canadensis) population and fishery characteristics implemented in Ohio reservoirs in 2011.Using a before‐after–control‐impact study design (n = 6 control populations and n = 11 impact populations that received the MLL), we compared total CPUE, age‐2+ CPUE, proportional stock density‐harvestable (381‐mm), and length at age 2 (to index growth) determined from standardized gill‐net surveys and saugeye angler effort, catch rate, harvest rate, length of saugeye at harvest, yield, and satisfaction obtained from standardized creel surveys.We found evidence that the 381‐mm MLL led to an increase in age‐2+ CPUE but had no effect on other saugeye population metrics. In the regulation reservoirs, harvest rates declined following MLL implementation. Total length of harvested saugeye did not increase significantly in response to the MLL, and combined with decreased harvest rates, yield was suppressed in the regulation reservoirs relative to the control reservoirs. However, over 90% of anglers reported that they were satisfied with the MLL during creel surveys.Despite marginal influence on saugeye populations and failure to increase yield, anglers supported the MLL. Our results suggest that the effects of harvest regulations may be marginal, and managers should consider the nuances of angler satisfaction in regulation decisions.
期刊介绍:
The North American Journal of Fisheries Management promotes communication among fishery managers with an emphasis on North America, and addresses the maintenance, enhancement, and allocation of fisheries resources. It chronicles the development of practical monitoring and management programs for finfish and exploitable shellfish in marine and freshwater environments.
Contributions relate to the management of fish populations, habitats, and users to protect and enhance fish and fishery resources for societal benefits. Case histories of successes, failures, and effects of fisheries programs help convey practical management experience to others.