Production of vinegar from waste fruits using Acetobacter species

S.K Paul, J. R. Wartu, A. Orukotan
{"title":"Production of vinegar from waste fruits using Acetobacter species","authors":"S.K Paul, J. R. Wartu, A. Orukotan","doi":"10.4314/ijs.v26i1.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vinegar is an organic substance that contains about 5% acetic acid and is made from the oxidative fermentation of alcohol by acetic acid  bacteria. The aim of this study was to produce vinegar from the juices of waste fruits. Proximate and physicochemical analysis was  carried out on the juices of orange, sugarcane, tomato, and pineapple using standard techniques. Twenty-one (21) species of acetic acid  bacteria were isolated and identified using glucose-yeast-Calciumcarbonate (GYC) agar. The juices were fermented for 7 days using  Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and subsequently, for 28 days, four alcohol-tolerant Acetobacterspecies were selected and inoculated into the  fermenting media. The produced vinegar was sensory evaluated, following a nine-point hedonic scale. The antibacterial and antifungal  effects of the vinegar were tested on fresh cabbage at various contact times (0, 5, and 10 min) and concentrations (5, 10, and 15 % v/v).  The physicochemical parameters analyzed in fermentation using S. cerevisiae showed a decrease in pH, specific gravity, and brix, while  the percentage of alcohol content increased. As the fermentation using Acetobacter species progressed, pH further decreased, titratable  acidity increased in a range of 6.6-7.7%, and specific gravity also decreased while specific gravity increased in Acetic acid fermentation.  Sensory evaluation showed a score range of 5.7–6.8 for pungency, 6.8–7.4 for appearance, 6.4–7.9 for aroma, 5.8–7.4 for taste, and 6.9–7.9  for acceptability. The best results for bacterial and fungal loads 5 on cabbage were at a concentration of 15% at 10 min. Drastic reduction  of bacterial load was from 2.07×10 to 4 4 3 2.7×10 CFU/g, while fungal load reduced from 4.9×10 to 6.7× 10 CFU/g. To evaluate  significance, an ANOVA was performed (p<0.05) and Duncan's test was used for multiple comparisons. Vinegar was successfully tested to  be effective as an antimicrobial agent. Future research should look into process optimization, strain improvement, and the adoption of  agro-allied wastes for biotechnology.","PeriodicalId":13487,"journal":{"name":"Ife Journal of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ife Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ijs.v26i1.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vinegar is an organic substance that contains about 5% acetic acid and is made from the oxidative fermentation of alcohol by acetic acid  bacteria. The aim of this study was to produce vinegar from the juices of waste fruits. Proximate and physicochemical analysis was  carried out on the juices of orange, sugarcane, tomato, and pineapple using standard techniques. Twenty-one (21) species of acetic acid  bacteria were isolated and identified using glucose-yeast-Calciumcarbonate (GYC) agar. The juices were fermented for 7 days using  Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and subsequently, for 28 days, four alcohol-tolerant Acetobacterspecies were selected and inoculated into the  fermenting media. The produced vinegar was sensory evaluated, following a nine-point hedonic scale. The antibacterial and antifungal  effects of the vinegar were tested on fresh cabbage at various contact times (0, 5, and 10 min) and concentrations (5, 10, and 15 % v/v).  The physicochemical parameters analyzed in fermentation using S. cerevisiae showed a decrease in pH, specific gravity, and brix, while  the percentage of alcohol content increased. As the fermentation using Acetobacter species progressed, pH further decreased, titratable  acidity increased in a range of 6.6-7.7%, and specific gravity also decreased while specific gravity increased in Acetic acid fermentation.  Sensory evaluation showed a score range of 5.7–6.8 for pungency, 6.8–7.4 for appearance, 6.4–7.9 for aroma, 5.8–7.4 for taste, and 6.9–7.9  for acceptability. The best results for bacterial and fungal loads 5 on cabbage were at a concentration of 15% at 10 min. Drastic reduction  of bacterial load was from 2.07×10 to 4 4 3 2.7×10 CFU/g, while fungal load reduced from 4.9×10 to 6.7× 10 CFU/g. To evaluate  significance, an ANOVA was performed (p<0.05) and Duncan's test was used for multiple comparisons. Vinegar was successfully tested to  be effective as an antimicrobial agent. Future research should look into process optimization, strain improvement, and the adoption of  agro-allied wastes for biotechnology.
利用醋酸菌从废弃水果中生产醋
醋是一种有机物质,含有约 5%的醋酸,由醋酸菌对酒精进行氧化发酵制成。本研究的目的是用废弃水果的果汁生产醋。采用标准技术对橙汁、甘蔗汁、番茄汁和菠萝汁进行了物性和理化分析。使用葡萄糖-酵母-碳酸钙(GYC)琼脂分离并鉴定了 21 种醋酸菌。使用酿酒酵母对果汁进行 7 天的发酵,然后在 28 天内筛选出 4 种耐受酒精的醋酸菌,并将其接种到发酵培养基中。按照九点享乐量表对生产的醋进行了感官评估。在不同的接触时间(0、5 和 10 分钟)和浓度(5、10 和 15 % v/v)下,测试了醋对新鲜卷心菜的抗菌和抗真菌效果。 在使用 S. cerevisiae 发酵过程中分析的理化参数显示,pH 值、比重和白利糖度都有所下降,而酒精含量的百分比则有所上升。随着醋酸菌发酵的进行,pH 值进一步下降,可滴定酸度在 6.6-7.7% 的范围内上升,比重也有所下降,而醋酸发酵时比重上升。 感官评价显示,辛辣味的评分范围为 5.7-6.8,外观评分范围为 6.8-7.4,香气评分范围为 6.4-7.9,口感评分范围为 5.8-7.4,可接受性评分范围为 6.9-7.9。在 10 分钟内浓度为 15%时,卷心菜上的细菌和真菌负载量 5 的结果最好。细菌量从 2.07×10 CFU/g 大幅减少到 4 4.3 2.7×10 CFU/g,真菌量从 4.9×10 CFU/g 减少到 6.7×10 CFU/g。为评估显著性,进行了方差分析(p<0.05),并使用邓肯检验进行多重比较。醋作为抗菌剂的有效性试验获得成功。未来的研究应着眼于工艺优化、菌株改良以及采用农业伴生废物的生物技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信