Delegating legislative powers to the European Commission: the threat of non-compliance with tertiary legislation in the member states

Nikoleta Yordanova, Asya Zhelyazkova
{"title":"Delegating legislative powers to the European Commission: the threat of non-compliance with tertiary legislation in the member states","authors":"Nikoleta Yordanova, Asya Zhelyazkova","doi":"10.1017/s0143814x24000096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n When does the delegation of legislative powers to the executive endanger policy compliance? The European Union (EU) Lisbon Treaty introduced quasi-legislative tertiary legislation – delegated acts – which empowers the European Commission to amend secondary legislation. Formally, member states control delegated acts only ex post via a veto power in the Council, while they have both ex ante amendment powers and ex post veto over the alternative Commission legislation: implementing acts. However, as member states determine the choice of legislative instrument, we argue that they would consent to the Commission adopting delegated acts only on non-controversial issues. Such selection should result in their lower compliance with implementing than with delegated acts. Our analyses of member states’ transposition delays and infringement cases related to EU tertiary directives support this argument. The results suggest that the delegation of legislative powers to the executive does not increase non-compliance when the legislators have the means to moderate it ex ante.","PeriodicalId":506680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Policy","volume":"53 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x24000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When does the delegation of legislative powers to the executive endanger policy compliance? The European Union (EU) Lisbon Treaty introduced quasi-legislative tertiary legislation – delegated acts – which empowers the European Commission to amend secondary legislation. Formally, member states control delegated acts only ex post via a veto power in the Council, while they have both ex ante amendment powers and ex post veto over the alternative Commission legislation: implementing acts. However, as member states determine the choice of legislative instrument, we argue that they would consent to the Commission adopting delegated acts only on non-controversial issues. Such selection should result in their lower compliance with implementing than with delegated acts. Our analyses of member states’ transposition delays and infringement cases related to EU tertiary directives support this argument. The results suggest that the delegation of legislative powers to the executive does not increase non-compliance when the legislators have the means to moderate it ex ante.
向欧盟委员会下放立法权:成员国不遵守三级立法的威胁
向行政部门下放立法权何时会危及政策的合规性?欧洲联盟(欧盟)《里斯本条约》引入了准立法三级立法--授权法案,授权欧盟委员会修改二级立法。从形式上看,成员国只能通过理事会的否决权事后控制委托法案,而对于委员会的替代立法--实施法案,成员国既有事前修正权,也有事后否决权。然而,由于成员国决定立法工具的选择,我们认为,它们会同意委员会只在无争议的问题上通过授权法案。这种选择应导致成员国对实施法案的遵守程度低于对委托法案的遵守程度。我们对成员国与欧盟三级指令相关的转化延迟和侵权案例的分析支持了这一论点。结果表明,如果立法者有办法事先控制不遵守行为,那么将立法权下放给行政部门并不会增加不遵守行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信