M. W. Wright, C. Thaxton, T. Nelson, Marina T. DiStefano, J. Savatt, Matthew H Brush, Gloria Cheung, Mark E. Mandell, Bryan Wulf, T. J. Ward, Scott Goehringer, Terry O'Neill, Phil Weller, C. Preston, Ingrid M Keseler, Jennifer L Goldstein, Natasha T Strande, Jennifer L McGlaughon, Danielle R Azzariti, Ineke Cordova, Hannah Dziadzio, Lawrence Babb, Kevin Riehle, A. Milosavljevic, Christa Lese Martin, Heidi L. Rehm, S. Plon, Jonathan S. Berg, E. Riggs, Teri E Klein
{"title":"Generating Clinical-Grade Gene-Disease Validity Classifications Through the ClinGen Data Platforms.","authors":"M. W. Wright, C. Thaxton, T. Nelson, Marina T. DiStefano, J. Savatt, Matthew H Brush, Gloria Cheung, Mark E. Mandell, Bryan Wulf, T. J. Ward, Scott Goehringer, Terry O'Neill, Phil Weller, C. Preston, Ingrid M Keseler, Jennifer L Goldstein, Natasha T Strande, Jennifer L McGlaughon, Danielle R Azzariti, Ineke Cordova, Hannah Dziadzio, Lawrence Babb, Kevin Riehle, A. Milosavljevic, Christa Lese Martin, Heidi L. Rehm, S. Plon, Jonathan S. Berg, E. Riggs, Teri E Klein","doi":"10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-102423-112456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical genetic laboratories must have access to clinically validated biomedical data for precision medicine. A lack of accessibility, normalized structure, and consistency in evaluation complicates interpretation of disease causality, resulting in confusion in assessing the clinical validity of genes and genetic variants for diagnosis. A key goal of the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) is to fill the knowledge gap concerning the strength of evidence supporting the role of a gene in a monogenic disease, which is achieved through a process known as Gene-Disease Validity curation. Here we review the work of ClinGen in developing a curation infrastructure that supports the standardization, harmonization, and dissemination of Gene-Disease Validity data through the creation of frameworks and the utilization of common data standards. This infrastructure is based on several applications, including the ClinGen GeneTracker, Gene Curation Interface, Data Exchange, GeneGraph, and website.","PeriodicalId":29775,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-102423-112456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical genetic laboratories must have access to clinically validated biomedical data for precision medicine. A lack of accessibility, normalized structure, and consistency in evaluation complicates interpretation of disease causality, resulting in confusion in assessing the clinical validity of genes and genetic variants for diagnosis. A key goal of the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) is to fill the knowledge gap concerning the strength of evidence supporting the role of a gene in a monogenic disease, which is achieved through a process known as Gene-Disease Validity curation. Here we review the work of ClinGen in developing a curation infrastructure that supports the standardization, harmonization, and dissemination of Gene-Disease Validity data through the creation of frameworks and the utilization of common data standards. This infrastructure is based on several applications, including the ClinGen GeneTracker, Gene Curation Interface, Data Exchange, GeneGraph, and website.
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science provides comprehensive expert reviews in biomedical data science, focusing on advanced methods to store, retrieve, analyze, and organize biomedical data and knowledge. The scope of the journal encompasses informatics, computational, artificial intelligence (AI), and statistical approaches to biomedical data, including the sub-fields of bioinformatics, computational biology, biomedical informatics, clinical and clinical research informatics, biostatistics, and imaging informatics. The mission of the journal is to identify both emerging and established areas of biomedical data science, and the leaders in these fields.