Impact of residual skin lesions and previous biologic treatment failure on patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic treatment

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Won Ji Song, Hyun-Sun Yoon
{"title":"Impact of residual skin lesions and previous biologic treatment failure on patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic treatment","authors":"Won Ji Song,&nbsp;Hyun-Sun Yoon","doi":"10.1111/1346-8138.17249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent advances in biologic treatments have made clear skin a realistic treatment goal for psoriasis. However, clear skin may not uniformly translate to an absence of impact on patients' quality of life. This retrospective observational study aimed to elucidate the factors influencing patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis who have demonstrated successful clinician-reported outcomes on using biologics. A total of 96 patients who have achieved a ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores with ≥6 months of biologic treatment were included. Their median PASI score was 0.4, with 37.5% having achieved PASI 100 (clear skin). Furthermore, 47.9% reported no impact of psoriasis on their quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] score 0 or 1), while 52.1% reported a negative impact (DLQI score ≥2). Notably, 28.1% of the participants had a history of biologic treatment failure, defined as the inability to achieve or sustain a 75% PASI improvement with the previously used biologic agent. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a positive association between achieving PASI 100 and reporting no impact of psoriasis on quality of life (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49–10.91, <i>P</i> = 0.007). Conversely, prior biologic treatment failure was negatively associated with reporting no impact of psoriasis on quality of life (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.65, <i>P</i> = 0.023). Furthermore, among patients with clear skin, those with experience of previous biologic treatment failure reported significantly lower quality of life than those without such experience (<i>P</i> = 0.033). In conclusion, minimal residual skin lesions and prior biologic treatment failure were associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis. Opting for a biologic agent with the highest predicted efficacy, rather than pursuing a “step-up” approach with a higher possibility of treatment failure, may be a more suitable strategy in the biologic treatment of psoriasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology","volume":"51 6","pages":"772-778"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1346-8138.17249","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1346-8138.17249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in biologic treatments have made clear skin a realistic treatment goal for psoriasis. However, clear skin may not uniformly translate to an absence of impact on patients' quality of life. This retrospective observational study aimed to elucidate the factors influencing patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis who have demonstrated successful clinician-reported outcomes on using biologics. A total of 96 patients who have achieved a ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores with ≥6 months of biologic treatment were included. Their median PASI score was 0.4, with 37.5% having achieved PASI 100 (clear skin). Furthermore, 47.9% reported no impact of psoriasis on their quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] score 0 or 1), while 52.1% reported a negative impact (DLQI score ≥2). Notably, 28.1% of the participants had a history of biologic treatment failure, defined as the inability to achieve or sustain a 75% PASI improvement with the previously used biologic agent. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a positive association between achieving PASI 100 and reporting no impact of psoriasis on quality of life (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49–10.91, P = 0.007). Conversely, prior biologic treatment failure was negatively associated with reporting no impact of psoriasis on quality of life (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.65, P = 0.023). Furthermore, among patients with clear skin, those with experience of previous biologic treatment failure reported significantly lower quality of life than those without such experience (P = 0.033). In conclusion, minimal residual skin lesions and prior biologic treatment failure were associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis. Opting for a biologic agent with the highest predicted efficacy, rather than pursuing a “step-up” approach with a higher possibility of treatment failure, may be a more suitable strategy in the biologic treatment of psoriasis.

Abstract Image

接受生物制剂治疗的银屑病患者的残余皮损和既往生物制剂治疗失败对患者报告结果的影响。
生物疗法的最新进展使皮肤无鳞屑成为银屑病治疗的现实目标。然而,皮肤光洁并不一定意味着患者的生活质量不受影响。这项回顾性观察研究旨在阐明影响银屑病患者患者报告结果的因素,这些患者在使用生物制剂治疗后,临床医生报告的结果均为成功。研究共纳入了96名接受生物制剂治疗≥6个月,银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)评分改善≥75%的患者。他们的 PASI 中位数为 0.4 分,37.5% 的患者达到了 PASI 100(皮肤无鳞屑)。此外,47.9%的患者表示银屑病对其生活质量没有影响(皮肤病生活质量指数 [DLQI] 得分为 0 或 1),52.1%的患者表示有负面影响(DLQI 得分≥2)。值得注意的是,28.1%的参与者曾有过生物制剂治疗失败史,生物制剂治疗失败的定义是之前使用的生物制剂无法达到或维持75%的PASI改善。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,PASI 达到 100 与报告银屑病对生活质量没有影响之间存在正相关(调整赔率 [aOR] 3.88,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.49-10.91,P = 0.007)。相反,之前的生物治疗失败与银屑病不影响生活质量呈负相关(aOR 0.13,95% CI 0.02-0.65,P = 0.023)。此外,在皮肤透明的患者中,曾有生物治疗失败经历的患者的生活质量明显低于无此经历的患者(P = 0.033)。总之,最小残留皮损和既往生物制剂治疗失败与银屑病患者较差的患者报告结果有关。在银屑病的生物治疗中,选择预测疗效最高的生物制剂,而不是采用治疗失败可能性较高的 "阶梯式 "方法,可能是更合适的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dermatology
Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
368
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatology is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Japanese Dermatological Association and the Asian Dermatological Association. The journal aims to provide a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in dermatology and to promote the discipline of dermatology in Japan and throughout the world. Research articles are supplemented by reviews, theoretical articles, special features, commentaries, book reviews and proceedings of workshops and conferences. Preliminary or short reports and letters to the editor of two printed pages or less will be published as soon as possible. Papers in all fields of dermatology will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信