The hidden costs of working from home: examining loneliness, role overload, and the role of social support during and beyond the COVID-19 lockdown

K. I. Fostervold, Pål Ulleberg, Odd Viggo Nilsen, Anne-Marie Halberg
{"title":"The hidden costs of working from home: examining loneliness, role overload, and the role of social support during and beyond the COVID-19 lockdown","authors":"K. I. Fostervold, Pål Ulleberg, Odd Viggo Nilsen, Anne-Marie Halberg","doi":"10.3389/forgp.2024.1380051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the impact of the number of days per week working from home (WFH) on employee loneliness during and 2 years after the COVID-19 lockdown, with a focus on role overload as a mediating factor and social support from coworkers as a moderating variable.Data were collected via self-reports from a sample of 6,918 participants during the lockdown in January 2021 and 6,576 participants 2 years post-lockdown in January 2023.Analysis using a moderated mediation model showed that increased WFH days were associated with heightened loneliness during the lockdown, a link that weakened post-lockdown. Role overload served as a mediator, intensifying loneliness during WFH but less so after the lockdown. While higher social support was generally linked to reduced role overload and loneliness, it paradoxically intensified these issues in individuals with extensive WFH days.The findings suggest that the number of days WFH can exacerbate loneliness and role overload among employees, with the effect being more pronounced during the lockdown. Employees with substantial social support faced more challenges as WFH duration increased. These results underscore the complex dynamics between WFH, social support, and employee wellbeing.","PeriodicalId":378099,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Organizational Psychology","volume":"60 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2024.1380051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of the number of days per week working from home (WFH) on employee loneliness during and 2 years after the COVID-19 lockdown, with a focus on role overload as a mediating factor and social support from coworkers as a moderating variable.Data were collected via self-reports from a sample of 6,918 participants during the lockdown in January 2021 and 6,576 participants 2 years post-lockdown in January 2023.Analysis using a moderated mediation model showed that increased WFH days were associated with heightened loneliness during the lockdown, a link that weakened post-lockdown. Role overload served as a mediator, intensifying loneliness during WFH but less so after the lockdown. While higher social support was generally linked to reduced role overload and loneliness, it paradoxically intensified these issues in individuals with extensive WFH days.The findings suggest that the number of days WFH can exacerbate loneliness and role overload among employees, with the effect being more pronounced during the lockdown. Employees with substantial social support faced more challenges as WFH duration increased. These results underscore the complex dynamics between WFH, social support, and employee wellbeing.
在家工作的隐性成本:研究 COVID-19 封锁期间和封锁后的孤独感、角色超负荷以及社会支持的作用
本研究评估了每周在家工作(WFH)天数在 COVID-19 封锁期间和封锁两年后对员工孤独感的影响,重点关注作为中介因素的角色超负荷和作为调节变量的同事社会支持。在 2021 年 1 月封锁期间和 2023 年 1 月封锁 2 年后,通过自我报告收集了 6918 名参与者的样本数据。使用调节中介模型进行的分析表明,在封锁期间,全职工作天数的增加与孤独感的增加有关,而封锁后这种联系减弱。角色超负荷是一个中介因素,它加剧了全职工作期间的孤独感,但在封锁后孤独感有所减弱。研究结果表明,全职工作的天数会加剧员工的孤独感和角色超负荷,这种影响在封锁期间更为明显。随着全职工作时间的增加,拥有大量社会支持的员工面临的挑战也更多。这些结果凸显了全职家庭、社会支持和员工福祉之间复杂的动态关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书