Miocene vanishing of the Central American Seaway between the Panamá Arc and the South American Plate

F. Vallejo-Hincapié, A. Pardo-Trujillo, Angel Barbosa-Espitia, Daniela Aguirre, Sergio A. Celis, Carlos A. Giraldo-Villegas, Angelo Plata-Torres, Raúl Trejos-Tamayo, A. Salazar-Ríos, J. Flores, Marie-Pierre Aubry, Fabián Gallego, Eduardo Delgado, David S. Foster
{"title":"Miocene vanishing of the Central American Seaway between the Panamá Arc and the South American Plate","authors":"F. Vallejo-Hincapié, A. Pardo-Trujillo, Angel Barbosa-Espitia, Daniela Aguirre, Sergio A. Celis, Carlos A. Giraldo-Villegas, Angelo Plata-Torres, Raúl Trejos-Tamayo, A. Salazar-Ríos, J. Flores, Marie-Pierre Aubry, Fabián Gallego, Eduardo Delgado, David S. Foster","doi":"10.1130/b37499.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A controversy has developed in recent years regarding the timing of the closure of the Central American Seaway. This tectonic event significantly impacted oceanic circulation between the tropical Pacific and Atlantic oceans and resulted in the formation of a land bridge connecting the South and North American continents. The long-held view of a Pliocene age (ca. 3 Ma) for the closure of the Central American Seaway has been challenged by the proposal that the Panamá Arc collided with South America during the Middle Miocene (15−13 Ma) as a deep oceanic gap between them closed along the Uramita suture zone. However, direct geologic evidence from this suture zone to support either interpretation has been lacking. Here, we report on a comprehensive study of three stratigraphic transects across the Uramita suture zone, using a host of methodologies including sedimentological, ichnological, micropaleontological, U-Pb detrital geochronological, and provenance analyses. Our data reveal that lower offshore to slope conditions prevailed in the Central American Seaway along the suture zone during the latest Early to earliest Middle Miocene (16.4−15.1 Ma) and that oceanic conditions there ceased to exist between the Middle and Late Miocene. These results agree with the Middle Miocene age proposed for the Central American Seaway closure along the tectonic boundary. However, other deeper portions of the Central American Seaway persisted in western Colombia, which challenges the notion of a Central American Seaway confined to the suture zone between the Panamá Arc and South American Plate during the Middle Miocene.","PeriodicalId":508784,"journal":{"name":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","volume":"42 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/b37499.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A controversy has developed in recent years regarding the timing of the closure of the Central American Seaway. This tectonic event significantly impacted oceanic circulation between the tropical Pacific and Atlantic oceans and resulted in the formation of a land bridge connecting the South and North American continents. The long-held view of a Pliocene age (ca. 3 Ma) for the closure of the Central American Seaway has been challenged by the proposal that the Panamá Arc collided with South America during the Middle Miocene (15−13 Ma) as a deep oceanic gap between them closed along the Uramita suture zone. However, direct geologic evidence from this suture zone to support either interpretation has been lacking. Here, we report on a comprehensive study of three stratigraphic transects across the Uramita suture zone, using a host of methodologies including sedimentological, ichnological, micropaleontological, U-Pb detrital geochronological, and provenance analyses. Our data reveal that lower offshore to slope conditions prevailed in the Central American Seaway along the suture zone during the latest Early to earliest Middle Miocene (16.4−15.1 Ma) and that oceanic conditions there ceased to exist between the Middle and Late Miocene. These results agree with the Middle Miocene age proposed for the Central American Seaway closure along the tectonic boundary. However, other deeper portions of the Central American Seaway persisted in western Colombia, which challenges the notion of a Central American Seaway confined to the suture zone between the Panamá Arc and South American Plate during the Middle Miocene.
中新世时期巴拿马弧和南美板块之间的中美洲海道消失
近年来,关于中美洲海道关闭的时间出现了争议。这一构造事件极大地影响了热带太平洋和大西洋之间的大洋环流,并形成了连接南美大陆和北美大陆的陆桥。长期以来,人们一直认为中美洲海道的关闭发生在上新世时期(约 3 Ma),但有一种观点认为,巴拿马弧与南美洲的碰撞发生在中新世时期(15-13 Ma),因为中美洲与南美洲之间的深海缝隙沿着乌拉米塔缝合带关闭了。然而,该缝合带一直缺乏直接的地质证据来支持这两种解释。在此,我们报告了对横跨乌拉米塔缝合带的三个地层横断面进行的综合研究,研究采用了一系列方法,包括沉积学、生态学、微古生物学、U-Pb 铁屑地质年代学和产状分析。我们的数据显示,缝合带沿线的中美洲海道在最晚的早中新世到最早的中新世(16.4-15.1Ma)期间普遍处于较低的近海到斜坡条件下,而在中新世中期和晚期之间,那里的海洋条件已不复存在。这些结果与中新世提出的中美洲海道沿构造边界关闭的年龄相吻合。然而,中美洲海道的其他较深部分在哥伦比亚西部依然存在,这对中新世时期中美洲海道仅限于巴拿马弧和南美洲板块之间缝合带的观点提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信