Yield of sugar beet with drip irrigation, with Penman’s equation and AquaCrop model

Jorge Pinna, Kevin Rivas
{"title":"Yield of sugar beet with drip irrigation, with Penman’s equation and AquaCrop model","authors":"Jorge Pinna, Kevin Rivas","doi":"10.47280/revfacagron(luz).v41.n2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is necessary to estimate sugar beet yield, because studies with this crop demonstrated than in Peruvian coastal zone, could be a profitable crop. The objective of the present experiment was to know if dry matter yield of sugar beet is related with Penman’s equation, or FAO’s AquaCrop model. Experiment was made in a sandy soil, non-salty, calcareous, very poor in organic matter, with drip irrigation in Peruvian northern coast. Four treatments: two, three, four and five plant rows per irrigation drip line, in a completely random design, with four replications were utilized. Calculated fresh matter weighs with AquaCrop were between 15.5 and 24.5 Mg.ha-1, very much lesser to real ones (between 67.5 and 103.9 Mg.ha-1) hence Aqua Crop model is not effective to estimate yield of sugar beet. It is possible to estimate yield of sugar beet, with Penman’s formula, which varied between 11.40 and 27.96 Mg.ha-1 dry weight, and the real one was between 13.4 and 21.5 Mg.ha-1, with a \"Root Mean Square Error\" (RMSE) of 3.73.","PeriodicalId":509934,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad del Zulia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad del Zulia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47280/revfacagron(luz).v41.n2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is necessary to estimate sugar beet yield, because studies with this crop demonstrated than in Peruvian coastal zone, could be a profitable crop. The objective of the present experiment was to know if dry matter yield of sugar beet is related with Penman’s equation, or FAO’s AquaCrop model. Experiment was made in a sandy soil, non-salty, calcareous, very poor in organic matter, with drip irrigation in Peruvian northern coast. Four treatments: two, three, four and five plant rows per irrigation drip line, in a completely random design, with four replications were utilized. Calculated fresh matter weighs with AquaCrop were between 15.5 and 24.5 Mg.ha-1, very much lesser to real ones (between 67.5 and 103.9 Mg.ha-1) hence Aqua Crop model is not effective to estimate yield of sugar beet. It is possible to estimate yield of sugar beet, with Penman’s formula, which varied between 11.40 and 27.96 Mg.ha-1 dry weight, and the real one was between 13.4 and 21.5 Mg.ha-1, with a "Root Mean Square Error" (RMSE) of 3.73.
利用彭曼方程和 AquaCrop 模型计算的滴灌甜菜产量
有必要对甜菜产量进行估算,因为对这种作物的研究表明,在秘鲁沿海地区,甜菜是一种有利可图的作物。本实验的目的是了解甜菜的干物质产量是否与彭曼方程或粮农组织的 AquaCrop 模型有关。实验在秘鲁北部海岸的沙质土壤中进行,土壤不含盐、石灰质,有机质含量极低,采用滴灌。采用完全随机设计的四种处理方法:每条滴灌线两行、三行、四行和五行,四次重复。使用 AquaCrop 计算出的新鲜物质重量介于 15.5 和 24.5 兆克/公顷之间,远低于实际重量(介于 67.5 和 103.9 兆克/公顷之间),因此 Aqua Crop 模型不能有效估算甜菜产量。使用彭曼公式可以估算甜菜产量,其干重在 11.40 至 27.96 毫克/公顷-1 之间变化,实际产量在 13.4 至 21.5 毫克/公顷-1 之间变化,"均方根误差"(RMSE)为 3.73。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信