Assessment of prenatal care adequacy using different normative criteria in a municipality in Santa Catarina, Brazil

Vanessa Martins Rosa, Roxana Knobel, Eliane Silva de Azevedo Traebert, Betine Pinto Moehlecke Iser
{"title":"Assessment of prenatal care adequacy using different normative criteria in a municipality in Santa Catarina, Brazil","authors":"Vanessa Martins Rosa, Roxana Knobel, Eliane Silva de Azevedo Traebert, Betine Pinto Moehlecke Iser","doi":"10.36922/ijps.1422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study aimed to evaluate the quality of prenatal care and identify associated factors among women admitted for delivery at a public maternity hospital in greater Florianópolis, Santa Catarina. This cross-sectional study included women who had received prenatal care through the Government Unified Health System in the city of São José and had been subsequently admitted to the hospital for delivery from November 2021 to April 2022. Data were obtained from the pregnant women’s booklet, their health records, and a specific questionnaire. The evaluation criteria included the Takeda-modified Kessner index, adapted adequacy of prenatal care utilization index, and Anversa classification. Adequacy was assessed based on pregnancy parameters and the patients’ characteristics. Among the 237 pregnant women in the sample, prenatal care adequacy ranged from 48.5 to 83.1% and was associated with older age, education, referral to high-risk prenatal care (HRPN) (20 – 30% higher prevalence of adequacy), and pregnancy planning. Notably, there was a tendency toward a reduction in the number of examinations (laboratory and physical) during pregnancy. The adequacy rate decreased with the application of stricter normative criteria and in advanced pregnancy stages. In conclusion, prenatal care quality was predominantly adequate, although it varied across indices and was associated with age, education, HRPN, and pregnancy planning.","PeriodicalId":73473,"journal":{"name":"International journal of population studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of population studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aimed to evaluate the quality of prenatal care and identify associated factors among women admitted for delivery at a public maternity hospital in greater Florianópolis, Santa Catarina. This cross-sectional study included women who had received prenatal care through the Government Unified Health System in the city of São José and had been subsequently admitted to the hospital for delivery from November 2021 to April 2022. Data were obtained from the pregnant women’s booklet, their health records, and a specific questionnaire. The evaluation criteria included the Takeda-modified Kessner index, adapted adequacy of prenatal care utilization index, and Anversa classification. Adequacy was assessed based on pregnancy parameters and the patients’ characteristics. Among the 237 pregnant women in the sample, prenatal care adequacy ranged from 48.5 to 83.1% and was associated with older age, education, referral to high-risk prenatal care (HRPN) (20 – 30% higher prevalence of adequacy), and pregnancy planning. Notably, there was a tendency toward a reduction in the number of examinations (laboratory and physical) during pregnancy. The adequacy rate decreased with the application of stricter normative criteria and in advanced pregnancy stages. In conclusion, prenatal care quality was predominantly adequate, although it varied across indices and was associated with age, education, HRPN, and pregnancy planning.
在巴西圣卡塔琳娜州的一个城市中使用不同的规范标准评估产前护理的适当性
本研究旨在对圣卡塔琳娜州大弗洛里亚诺波利斯市一家公立妇产医院的产妇进行产前护理质量评估,并确定相关因素。这项横断面研究纳入了2021年11月至2022年4月期间通过圣若泽市政府统一医疗系统接受产前护理并随后入院分娩的产妇。数据来自孕妇手册、健康记录和一份特定的调查问卷。评估标准包括武田改良凯斯纳指数、产前护理利用充分性改编指数和安弗萨分类。充分性是根据妊娠参数和患者特征进行评估的。在样本中的 237 名孕妇中,产前护理充足率从 48.5% 到 83.1%不等,与高龄、受教育程度、转诊到高风险产前护理(HRPN)(充足率高出 20 - 30%)和怀孕计划有关。值得注意的是,孕期检查(化验和体检)的次数有减少的趋势。在采用更严格的规范标准和妊娠晚期,适当率有所下降。总之,产前保健质量主要是适当的,尽管不同指数之间存在差异,并且与年龄、教育程度、人乳头瘤病毒(HRPN)和怀孕计划有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信