Low-Level Laser Therapy for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi, Ida Mohammadi, Aryan Aarabi, Samin Sadraei
{"title":"Low-Level Laser Therapy for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi, Ida Mohammadi, Aryan Aarabi, Samin Sadraei","doi":"10.1159/000538049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nAllergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disorder that impairs social and physical functioning as well as quality of life. It is characterized by sneezing, rhinorrhea, congestion, and itching which respond suboptimally to drug therapy. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties that have shown promise in some studies. We aimed to systematically review LLLT's effectiveness in treating AR and meta-analyze our findings.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on November 24, 2023. All studies investigating LLLT on AR were included, and a pre-post meta-analysis of nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing) in the LLLT-treated arm was conducted. Rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) scores before and after LLLT were also meta-analyzed alongside a pairwise meta-analysis of LLLT with placebo, acupuncture, steroids/antihistamines, and ultraviolet lasers. A random-effects model was used with a conservative pre-post correlation of 0.4 and standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect size.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSixteen studies were included in this review, and we found that nasal symptoms are alleviated post-LLLT in people with AR (SMD: -1.4, 95 CI: [-2.07 to -1.13], p value <0.001). RQLQ scores were also reduced after LLLT (SMD = -0.72, 95 CI: [-0.94 to -0.50], p value <0.001), and very few adverse events were reported. This meta-analysis, however, had significant publication bias and heterogeneity. When compared to a placebo, LLLT did not significantly improve nasal symptoms (SMD: -0.69, p value = 0.167), which might mean the post-LLLT nasal symptom alleviation is due to a placebo effect. Comparisons to other treatment modalities were too few to deduce anything meaningful, although it does appear that LLLT is less effective than UV lasers.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nLLLT is most likely effective at alleviating nasal symptomology and has a low likelihood of adverse event incidence, yet more high-quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed to compare LLLT to a placebo to ensure its superiority to the placebo effect, as well as non-inferiority clinical trials to compare it to standard treatments.","PeriodicalId":504350,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":"3 3","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disorder that impairs social and physical functioning as well as quality of life. It is characterized by sneezing, rhinorrhea, congestion, and itching which respond suboptimally to drug therapy. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties that have shown promise in some studies. We aimed to systematically review LLLT's effectiveness in treating AR and meta-analyze our findings. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on November 24, 2023. All studies investigating LLLT on AR were included, and a pre-post meta-analysis of nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing) in the LLLT-treated arm was conducted. Rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) scores before and after LLLT were also meta-analyzed alongside a pairwise meta-analysis of LLLT with placebo, acupuncture, steroids/antihistamines, and ultraviolet lasers. A random-effects model was used with a conservative pre-post correlation of 0.4 and standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect size. RESULTS Sixteen studies were included in this review, and we found that nasal symptoms are alleviated post-LLLT in people with AR (SMD: -1.4, 95 CI: [-2.07 to -1.13], p value <0.001). RQLQ scores were also reduced after LLLT (SMD = -0.72, 95 CI: [-0.94 to -0.50], p value <0.001), and very few adverse events were reported. This meta-analysis, however, had significant publication bias and heterogeneity. When compared to a placebo, LLLT did not significantly improve nasal symptoms (SMD: -0.69, p value = 0.167), which might mean the post-LLLT nasal symptom alleviation is due to a placebo effect. Comparisons to other treatment modalities were too few to deduce anything meaningful, although it does appear that LLLT is less effective than UV lasers. CONCLUSION LLLT is most likely effective at alleviating nasal symptomology and has a low likelihood of adverse event incidence, yet more high-quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed to compare LLLT to a placebo to ensure its superiority to the placebo effect, as well as non-inferiority clinical trials to compare it to standard treatments.
治疗过敏性鼻炎的低强度激光疗法:系统回顾与元分析》。
简介过敏性鼻炎(AR)是一种常见的过敏性疾病,会影响社交和身体机能以及生活质量。过敏性鼻炎以打喷嚏、流鼻涕、鼻塞和瘙痒为特征,药物治疗效果不佳。低强度激光疗法(LLLT)具有抗炎和免疫抑制的特性,在一些研究中显示了其前景。我们的目的是系统回顾 LLLT 治疗 AR 的有效性,并对我们的发现进行元分析。方法2023 年 11 月 24 日,我们对 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 进行了系统检索。纳入了所有对 LLLT 治疗 AR 的研究,并对 LLLT 治疗组的鼻部症状(鼻出血、鼻塞、鼻痒和打喷嚏)进行了前后荟萃分析。在对 LLLT 与安慰剂、针灸、类固醇/抗组胺药和紫外线激光进行配对荟萃分析的同时,还对 LLLT 治疗前后的鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷 (RQLQ) 评分进行了荟萃分析。本综述共纳入了 16 项研究,我们发现 LLLT 治疗后 AR 患者的鼻部症状有所缓解(SMD:-1.4,95 CI:[-2.07 至-1.13],P 值<0.001)。LLLT 后,RQLQ 分数也有所降低(SMD = -0.72,95 CI:[-0.94 至 -0.50],p 值<0.001),而且很少有不良反应报告。然而,这项荟萃分析存在严重的发表偏倚和异质性。与安慰剂相比,LLLT 并未明显改善鼻部症状(SMD:-0.69,P 值 = 0.167),这可能意味着 LLLT 后鼻部症状的减轻是由于安慰剂效应。与其他治疗方式的比较太少,无法推断出任何有意义的结论,尽管 LLLT 的效果似乎不如紫外线激光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信