{"title":"Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke of large-vessel occlusion beyond the time window based on imaging evaluation.","authors":"Shi-Dun Chen, Cheng-Bao Yang, Yong-Xiang Wang, Yue-Han Yin, B. Gao, Chun-Guang Chen","doi":"10.1177/15910199241250081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nEndovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) over 24 h of onset remains controversial. This study was to explore the safety and efficacy of EVT for patients with AIS-LVO between 24 and 72 h of symptom onset after rigorous imaging evaluation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients with AIS-LVO treated with EVT were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups according to the time from symptom onset to groin puncture: 64 in the over-time group (>24 h) and 257 in the within-time group (≤24 h). Outcomes included 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, functional independence (defined as mRS 0-2), successful cerebral reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 3-month mortality.\n\n\nRESULTS\nPatients in the over-time group had no significant differences in the functional independence (40.6% vs 42.5%, odds ratio or OR 0.91, 95% confidence interval or CI 0.52-1.60, p = 0.753), successful reperfusion (96.7% vs 95.8%, OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.36-1.59, p = 0.467), sICH (8.3% vs 6.7%, OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.42-3.38, p = 0.735), 3-month mortality (13.3% vs 10.8%, OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.51-2.70, p = 0.716) compared with patients in the within-time group. After matching adjustment, the results did not change significantly.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe safety and effectiveness of EVT treatment for selected AIS-LVO patients with symptom onset of 24-72 h are not inferior to those treated within 6-24 h of onset, especially in a short term based on the pre-treatment advanced neuroimaging computed tomography perfusion even though further investigations are necessary to prove this finding.","PeriodicalId":126264,"journal":{"name":"Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences","volume":"1 7","pages":"15910199241250081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241250081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE
Endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) over 24 h of onset remains controversial. This study was to explore the safety and efficacy of EVT for patients with AIS-LVO between 24 and 72 h of symptom onset after rigorous imaging evaluation.
METHODS
Patients with AIS-LVO treated with EVT were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups according to the time from symptom onset to groin puncture: 64 in the over-time group (>24 h) and 257 in the within-time group (≤24 h). Outcomes included 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, functional independence (defined as mRS 0-2), successful cerebral reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 3-month mortality.
RESULTS
Patients in the over-time group had no significant differences in the functional independence (40.6% vs 42.5%, odds ratio or OR 0.91, 95% confidence interval or CI 0.52-1.60, p = 0.753), successful reperfusion (96.7% vs 95.8%, OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.36-1.59, p = 0.467), sICH (8.3% vs 6.7%, OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.42-3.38, p = 0.735), 3-month mortality (13.3% vs 10.8%, OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.51-2.70, p = 0.716) compared with patients in the within-time group. After matching adjustment, the results did not change significantly.
CONCLUSIONS
The safety and effectiveness of EVT treatment for selected AIS-LVO patients with symptom onset of 24-72 h are not inferior to those treated within 6-24 h of onset, especially in a short term based on the pre-treatment advanced neuroimaging computed tomography perfusion even though further investigations are necessary to prove this finding.
目的大血管闭塞(AIS-LVO)引起的急性缺血性卒中(发病超过 24 小时)的血管内治疗(EVT)仍存在争议。方法回顾性入组接受EVT治疗的AIS-LVO患者,根据从症状出现到腹股沟穿刺的时间分为两组:超时组(>24 h)64例,限时组(≤24 h)257例。结果包括3个月的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分、功能独立性(定义为mRS 0-2)、成功的脑再灌注、症状性颅内出血(sICH)和3个月的死亡率。91, 95% confidence interval or CI 0.52-1.60, p = 0.753)、再灌注成功率(96.7% vs 95.8%,OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.36-1.59,p = 0.467)、sICH(8.3% vs 6.7%,OR 1.20,95% CI 0.42-3.38,p = 0.735)、3 个月死亡率(13.3% vs 10.8%,OR 1.17,95% CI 0.51-2.70,p = 0.716)。结论:根据治疗前的高级神经影像学计算机断层扫描灌注情况,EVT 治疗的安全性和有效性并不比在发病后 6-24 小时内接受治疗的患者差,尤其是在短期内,但这一结论还需要进一步的研究来证明。