Relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus vs mycophenolate after solid organ transplantation and its implications for liver transplant care

Abstract

BACKGROUND De novo malignancy is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Cumulative immunosuppression has been shown to contribute to post-transplant malignancy (PTM) risk. There is emerging evidence on the differential carcinogenic risk profile of individual immunosuppressive drugs, independent of the net effect of immunosuppression. Calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus may promote tumourigenesis, whereas mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil, may limit tumour progression. Liver transplantation (LT) is relatively unique among solid organ transplantation in that immunosuppression monotherapy with either tacrolimus or MPA is often achievable, which makes careful consideration of the risk-benefit profile of these immunosuppression agents particularly relevant for this cohort. However, there is limited clinical data on this subject in both LT and other solid organ transplant recipients. AIM To investigate the relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus and MPA in solid organ transplantation. METHODS A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase databases using the key terms “solid organ transplantation”, “tacrolimus”, “mycophenolic acid”, and “carcinogenicity”, in order to identify relevant articles published in English between 1st January 2002 to 11th August 2022. Related terms, synonyms and explosion of MeSH terms, Boolean operators and truncations were also utilised in the search. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed to identify any additional articles. Excluding duplicates, abstracts from 1230 records were screened by a single reviewer, whereby 31 records were reviewed in detail. Full-text articles were assessed for eligibility based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS A total of 6 studies were included in this review. All studies were large population registries or cohort studies, which varied in transplant era, type of organ transplanted and immunosuppression protocol used. Overall, there was no clear difference demonstrated between tacrolimus and MPA in de novo PTM risk following solid organ transplantation. Furthermore, no study provided a direct comparison of carcinogenic risk between tacrolimus and MPA monotherapy in solid organ transplantation recipients. CONCLUSION The contrasting carcinogenic risk profiles of tacrolimus and MPA demonstrated in previous experimental studies, and its application in solid organ transplantation, is yet to be confirmed in clinical studies. Thus, the optimal choice of immunosuppression drug to use as maintenance monotherapy in LT recipients is not supported by a strong evidence base and remains unclear.