Contributions of shared book reading to children's learning of new semantic facts through memory integration

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater, Bethany M. Williams, Melanie H. Hanft, Patricia J. Bauer
{"title":"Contributions of shared book reading to children's learning of new semantic facts through memory integration","authors":"Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater,&nbsp;Bethany M. Williams,&nbsp;Melanie H. Hanft,&nbsp;Patricia J. Bauer","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Young children rapidly learn facts about the world. One mechanism supporting knowledge acquisition is memory integration: derivation of new knowledge by combining separate, yet related facts accumulated over time. There are both developmental changes and individual differences in young children's learning through memory integration. However, there is little research on how everyday social interactions may promote memory integration and contribute to individual differences. Accordingly, we investigated how the everyday social interactions of caregiver-child shared book reading support 5- to 6-year-olds’ memory integration (<em>N</em> = 82 parent-child dyads; 47 female children; <em>M</em> age 6.10; 56.5 % White non-Latinx, 15 % Black, 6 % White Latinx, 5.5 % Asian, 17 % more than one race). Caregivers read a narrative book that included opportunities to integrate facts. Half the dyads were assigned to an embedded questions condition (questions on facts included throughout the book) and half to a no embedded questions condition (statements only). We measured dyads’ extratextual talk while reading for the extent to which they integrated the facts (integration talk). Children's learning was tested with both memory integration and fact recall questions. Dyads in the embedded questions condition had more integration talk. The extent to which the dyads integrated while reading predicted children's integration performance, above and beyond condition effects. This effect was specific to memory integration: integration talk nor condition accounted for fact recall. These results suggest that shared book reading can support young children's integration, especially when books engage dyads through embedded questions and dyads integrate facts while reading.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 99-111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000498","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young children rapidly learn facts about the world. One mechanism supporting knowledge acquisition is memory integration: derivation of new knowledge by combining separate, yet related facts accumulated over time. There are both developmental changes and individual differences in young children's learning through memory integration. However, there is little research on how everyday social interactions may promote memory integration and contribute to individual differences. Accordingly, we investigated how the everyday social interactions of caregiver-child shared book reading support 5- to 6-year-olds’ memory integration (N = 82 parent-child dyads; 47 female children; M age 6.10; 56.5 % White non-Latinx, 15 % Black, 6 % White Latinx, 5.5 % Asian, 17 % more than one race). Caregivers read a narrative book that included opportunities to integrate facts. Half the dyads were assigned to an embedded questions condition (questions on facts included throughout the book) and half to a no embedded questions condition (statements only). We measured dyads’ extratextual talk while reading for the extent to which they integrated the facts (integration talk). Children's learning was tested with both memory integration and fact recall questions. Dyads in the embedded questions condition had more integration talk. The extent to which the dyads integrated while reading predicted children's integration performance, above and beyond condition effects. This effect was specific to memory integration: integration talk nor condition accounted for fact recall. These results suggest that shared book reading can support young children's integration, especially when books engage dyads through embedded questions and dyads integrate facts while reading.

共同阅读图书有助于儿童通过记忆整合学习新的语义事实
幼儿会迅速学习有关世界的知识。支持知识获取的机制之一是记忆整合:通过将长期积累的独立但相关的事实结合在一起,衍生出新的知识。在幼儿通过记忆整合进行学习的过程中,既存在发展变化,也存在个体差异。然而,有关日常社会互动如何促进记忆整合并造成个体差异的研究却很少。因此,我们研究了照顾者与幼儿共同阅读书籍的日常社交互动如何支持 5-6 岁幼儿的记忆整合(人数 = 82 个亲子二人组;47 名女性幼儿;平均年龄 6.10 岁;56.5% 为非拉丁裔白人,15% 为黑人,6% 为拉丁裔白人,5.5% 为亚裔,17% 为多个种族)。照顾者阅读一本叙事性书籍,其中包括整合事实的机会。一半的二人组被分配到嵌入式问题条件下(整本书都包含有关事实的问题),一半的二人组被分配到无嵌入式问题条件下(只有陈述)。我们测量了二人组在阅读时的文本外谈话,以了解他们整合事实的程度(整合谈话)。儿童的学习情况通过记忆整合和事实回忆问题进行测试。在嵌入式问题条件下,二人组有更多的整合谈话。二人组在阅读时进行整合的程度预示着儿童的整合表现,其程度超过了条件效应。这种效应只对记忆整合有影响:整合谈话和条件对事实回忆都没有影响。这些结果表明,共同阅读图书可以帮助幼儿进行整合,尤其是当图书通过嵌入式问题吸引二人组参与,并且二人组在阅读时整合事实时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信