Alexander Olausson , Eva Angelini , Birgit Heckemann , Paulin Andréll , Pether Jildenstål , Sven-Egron Thörn , Axel Wolf
{"title":"Patients’ perioperative experiences of an opioid-free versus opioid-based care pathway for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A qualitative study","authors":"Alexander Olausson , Eva Angelini , Birgit Heckemann , Paulin Andréll , Pether Jildenstål , Sven-Egron Thörn , Axel Wolf","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite recent evidence supporting the adoption of opioid-free anaesthetic and analgesic alternatives in the perioperative context, opioid-based regimens remain standard of care. There is limited knowledge about the patients’ perioperative experiences of bariatric surgery, with no study yet investigating their experiences within an opioid-free care pathway.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to describe similarities and differences in patients’ perioperative experiences of undergoing bariatric surgery with either an opioid-free or opioid-based care pathway.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A qualitative interview study</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>A strategic sample of patients enrolled in an ongoing randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of opioid-free anaesthesia for bariatric surgery were recruited. In the randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to either opioid-based anaesthesia or opioid-free anaesthesia, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as primary postoperative pain management.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty patients were interviewed 3 months after surgery: 10 participants in the opioid-free group versus 10 in the opioid-based group.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted between December 2020 and February 2022 and analysed with qualitative content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis yielded four categories and 12 subcategories. In Category 1, participants shared <em>diverse emotions before surgery,</em> including <em>anticipation</em> of a healthier life, but also <em>apprehensions</em> and <em>feelings of failure</em>. In Category 2, describing <em>liminality of general anaesthesia</em>, there were similar descriptions of <em>struggling to remember</em> the anaesthesia induction and <em>struggling to surface</em> when recovering from anaesthesia. However, some participants in the opioid-free group shared descriptions of <em>struggling to keep control</em>, describing accentuated memories of the anaesthesia induction. Category 3, <em>managing your pain,</em> showed similar <em>experiences and strategies</em> but different narrations of pain management, with the opioid-free group stating that <em>transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation works but not when it really hurts</em>, and the opioid-based group describing <em>confidence in but awareness of opioids</em>. Throughout the overall perioperative time period, participants acknowledged Category 4, a <em>patient-professional</em> presence, stating that <em>preparations boost the feeling of confidence</em> before surgery and that they felt <em>confidence in a vulnerable situation</em> although <em>vulnerability challenges communication</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We highlighted the overall similarities in perioperative experiences of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the differences in experiences during opioid-free anaesthesia induction need to be addressed in further implementation and research studies investigating strategies to reduce the sense of loss of control. More research is needed to facilitate the implementation of opioid-free treatment strategies into clinical practice and improve the patient care experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000286/pdfft?md5=8a4c4de5a4188cfe5e52d4438e9c593f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000286-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Despite recent evidence supporting the adoption of opioid-free anaesthetic and analgesic alternatives in the perioperative context, opioid-based regimens remain standard of care. There is limited knowledge about the patients’ perioperative experiences of bariatric surgery, with no study yet investigating their experiences within an opioid-free care pathway.
Objective
We aimed to describe similarities and differences in patients’ perioperative experiences of undergoing bariatric surgery with either an opioid-free or opioid-based care pathway.
Design
A qualitative interview study
Setting
A strategic sample of patients enrolled in an ongoing randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of opioid-free anaesthesia for bariatric surgery were recruited. In the randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to either opioid-based anaesthesia or opioid-free anaesthesia, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as primary postoperative pain management.
Participants
Twenty patients were interviewed 3 months after surgery: 10 participants in the opioid-free group versus 10 in the opioid-based group.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted between December 2020 and February 2022 and analysed with qualitative content analysis.
Results
The analysis yielded four categories and 12 subcategories. In Category 1, participants shared diverse emotions before surgery, including anticipation of a healthier life, but also apprehensions and feelings of failure. In Category 2, describing liminality of general anaesthesia, there were similar descriptions of struggling to remember the anaesthesia induction and struggling to surface when recovering from anaesthesia. However, some participants in the opioid-free group shared descriptions of struggling to keep control, describing accentuated memories of the anaesthesia induction. Category 3, managing your pain, showed similar experiences and strategies but different narrations of pain management, with the opioid-free group stating that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation works but not when it really hurts, and the opioid-based group describing confidence in but awareness of opioids. Throughout the overall perioperative time period, participants acknowledged Category 4, a patient-professional presence, stating that preparations boost the feeling of confidence before surgery and that they felt confidence in a vulnerable situation although vulnerability challenges communication.
Conclusions
We highlighted the overall similarities in perioperative experiences of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the differences in experiences during opioid-free anaesthesia induction need to be addressed in further implementation and research studies investigating strategies to reduce the sense of loss of control. More research is needed to facilitate the implementation of opioid-free treatment strategies into clinical practice and improve the patient care experience.