Patients’ perioperative experiences of an opioid-free versus opioid-based care pathway for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A qualitative study

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Alexander Olausson , Eva Angelini , Birgit Heckemann , Paulin Andréll , Pether Jildenstål , Sven-Egron Thörn , Axel Wolf
{"title":"Patients’ perioperative experiences of an opioid-free versus opioid-based care pathway for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A qualitative study","authors":"Alexander Olausson ,&nbsp;Eva Angelini ,&nbsp;Birgit Heckemann ,&nbsp;Paulin Andréll ,&nbsp;Pether Jildenstål ,&nbsp;Sven-Egron Thörn ,&nbsp;Axel Wolf","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite recent evidence supporting the adoption of opioid-free anaesthetic and analgesic alternatives in the perioperative context, opioid-based regimens remain standard of care. There is limited knowledge about the patients’ perioperative experiences of bariatric surgery, with no study yet investigating their experiences within an opioid-free care pathway.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to describe similarities and differences in patients’ perioperative experiences of undergoing bariatric surgery with either an opioid-free or opioid-based care pathway.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A qualitative interview study</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>A strategic sample of patients enrolled in an ongoing randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of opioid-free anaesthesia for bariatric surgery were recruited. In the randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to either opioid-based anaesthesia or opioid-free anaesthesia, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as primary postoperative pain management.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty patients were interviewed 3 months after surgery: 10 participants in the opioid-free group versus 10 in the opioid-based group.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted between December 2020 and February 2022 and analysed with qualitative content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis yielded four categories and 12 subcategories. In Category 1, participants shared <em>diverse emotions before surgery,</em> including <em>anticipation</em> of a healthier life, but also <em>apprehensions</em> and <em>feelings of failure</em>. In Category 2, describing <em>liminality of general anaesthesia</em>, there were similar descriptions of <em>struggling to remember</em> the anaesthesia induction and <em>struggling to surface</em> when recovering from anaesthesia. However, some participants in the opioid-free group shared descriptions of <em>struggling to keep control</em>, describing accentuated memories of the anaesthesia induction. Category 3, <em>managing your pain,</em> showed similar <em>experiences and strategies</em> but different narrations of pain management, with the opioid-free group stating that <em>transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation works but not when it really hurts</em>, and the opioid-based group describing <em>confidence in but awareness of opioids</em>. Throughout the overall perioperative time period, participants acknowledged Category 4, a <em>patient-professional</em> presence, stating that <em>preparations boost the feeling of confidence</em> before surgery and that they felt <em>confidence in a vulnerable situation</em> although <em>vulnerability challenges communication</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We highlighted the overall similarities in perioperative experiences of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the differences in experiences during opioid-free anaesthesia induction need to be addressed in further implementation and research studies investigating strategies to reduce the sense of loss of control. More research is needed to facilitate the implementation of opioid-free treatment strategies into clinical practice and improve the patient care experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000286/pdfft?md5=8a4c4de5a4188cfe5e52d4438e9c593f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000286-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite recent evidence supporting the adoption of opioid-free anaesthetic and analgesic alternatives in the perioperative context, opioid-based regimens remain standard of care. There is limited knowledge about the patients’ perioperative experiences of bariatric surgery, with no study yet investigating their experiences within an opioid-free care pathway.

Objective

We aimed to describe similarities and differences in patients’ perioperative experiences of undergoing bariatric surgery with either an opioid-free or opioid-based care pathway.

Design

A qualitative interview study

Setting

A strategic sample of patients enrolled in an ongoing randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of opioid-free anaesthesia for bariatric surgery were recruited. In the randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to either opioid-based anaesthesia or opioid-free anaesthesia, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as primary postoperative pain management.

Participants

Twenty patients were interviewed 3 months after surgery: 10 participants in the opioid-free group versus 10 in the opioid-based group.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted between December 2020 and February 2022 and analysed with qualitative content analysis.

Results

The analysis yielded four categories and 12 subcategories. In Category 1, participants shared diverse emotions before surgery, including anticipation of a healthier life, but also apprehensions and feelings of failure. In Category 2, describing liminality of general anaesthesia, there were similar descriptions of struggling to remember the anaesthesia induction and struggling to surface when recovering from anaesthesia. However, some participants in the opioid-free group shared descriptions of struggling to keep control, describing accentuated memories of the anaesthesia induction. Category 3, managing your pain, showed similar experiences and strategies but different narrations of pain management, with the opioid-free group stating that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation works but not when it really hurts, and the opioid-based group describing confidence in but awareness of opioids. Throughout the overall perioperative time period, participants acknowledged Category 4, a patient-professional presence, stating that preparations boost the feeling of confidence before surgery and that they felt confidence in a vulnerable situation although vulnerability challenges communication.

Conclusions

We highlighted the overall similarities in perioperative experiences of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the differences in experiences during opioid-free anaesthesia induction need to be addressed in further implementation and research studies investigating strategies to reduce the sense of loss of control. More research is needed to facilitate the implementation of opioid-free treatment strategies into clinical practice and improve the patient care experience.

腹腔镜减肥手术无阿片护理路径与阿片护理路径的患者围手术期体验:定性研究
背景尽管最近有证据支持在围手术期采用不含阿片类药物的麻醉和镇痛替代方案,但以阿片类药物为基础的治疗方案仍是标准护理方案。关于患者在减肥手术围手术期的经历,我们所知甚少,目前还没有研究对患者在无阿片护理路径下的经历进行调查。我们旨在描述患者在无阿片或阿片护理路径下接受减肥手术围手术期经历的异同。在随机对照试验中,参与者被随机分配到阿片类药物麻醉或无阿片类药物麻醉,包括经皮神经电刺激作为术后疼痛治疗的主要方法:方法在 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月期间进行了半结构化访谈,并对访谈内容进行了定性分析。结果分析得出了四个类别和 12 个子类别。在第 1 类中,参与者分享了手术前的各种情绪,包括对更健康生活的期待,但也有担忧和失败感。在描述全身麻醉临界状态的第 2 类中,也有类似的描述,即努力回忆麻醉诱导和在麻醉恢复时努力浮出水面。然而,不使用阿片类药物组的一些参与者也描述了他们努力保持控制的情况,描述了他们对麻醉诱导的深刻记忆。无阿片组的参与者表示经皮神经电刺激很有效,但真正疼痛时就不行了,而使用阿片类药物组的参与者则表示对阿片类药物很有信心,但也意识到了这一点。在整个围手术期,参与者都承认第 4 类情况,即患者与专业人员之间的存在,他们说术前准备工作增强了自信感,他们在脆弱的情况下感受到了自信,尽管脆弱给沟通带来了挑战。然而,无阿片麻醉诱导过程中的体验差异需要在进一步的实施和研究中加以解决,调查减少失控感的策略。我们需要开展更多的研究,以促进无阿片治疗策略在临床实践中的实施,并改善患者的护理体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信