Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers pretreated with cisplatin/gemcitabine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
{"title":"Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers pretreated with cisplatin/gemcitabine: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"A. Digklia , D. Arnold , I.A. Voutsadakis","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Biliary cancers are aggressive carcinomas frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Palliative combination systemic therapy provides survival benefits in the first-line setting of advanced and metastatic disease. FOLFOX chemotherapy is one of the few options in the second-line therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The medical literature was searched through the Medline/PubMed and Embase databases to acquire clinical reports or trials of FOLFOX treatment for biliary cancers in the second-line metastatic setting after first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine chemotherapy. Eligible prospective and retrospective studies were reviewed and included in a meta-analysis with overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as outcomes of interest.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six clinical studies were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The ORR with second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy in this population was 10.42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.55% to 16.3%]. Two-fifths of the patients had stable disease for a DCR of 50.65% (95% CI 38.4% to 62.9%). The median PFS was 3.03 months (95% CI 1.38-4.09 months) and the median OS was 6.43 months (95% CI 5.43-7.43 months). The main grade 3/4 adverse effects observed in >10% of patients were neutropenia (21.2%) and asthenia/fatigue (10.3%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The meta-analysis observed a moderate efficacy of the FOLFOX combination in this setting. These results may be used as a benchmark to compare gains obtained in this setting with novel treatments, including recently introduced targeted therapies in appropriately selected patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000165/pdfft?md5=c8d52ffa2793b1b75e9b284b1ac2b435&pid=1-s2.0-S2949819824000165-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Biliary cancers are aggressive carcinomas frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Palliative combination systemic therapy provides survival benefits in the first-line setting of advanced and metastatic disease. FOLFOX chemotherapy is one of the few options in the second-line therapy.
Materials and methods
The medical literature was searched through the Medline/PubMed and Embase databases to acquire clinical reports or trials of FOLFOX treatment for biliary cancers in the second-line metastatic setting after first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine chemotherapy. Eligible prospective and retrospective studies were reviewed and included in a meta-analysis with overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as outcomes of interest.
Results
Six clinical studies were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The ORR with second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy in this population was 10.42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.55% to 16.3%]. Two-fifths of the patients had stable disease for a DCR of 50.65% (95% CI 38.4% to 62.9%). The median PFS was 3.03 months (95% CI 1.38-4.09 months) and the median OS was 6.43 months (95% CI 5.43-7.43 months). The main grade 3/4 adverse effects observed in >10% of patients were neutropenia (21.2%) and asthenia/fatigue (10.3%).
Conclusions
The meta-analysis observed a moderate efficacy of the FOLFOX combination in this setting. These results may be used as a benchmark to compare gains obtained in this setting with novel treatments, including recently introduced targeted therapies in appropriately selected patients.