Radiation therapy of renal cell carcinoma skeletal metastases – Does histologic subtype predict progression?

Kavin Sundaram , Joshua M. Lawrenz , Precious C. Oyem , Aditya Banerjee , Shannon Wu , Paras Shah , Shireen Parsai , Chirag Shah , Nathan W. Mesko , John Reith , Lukas M. Nystrom
{"title":"Radiation therapy of renal cell carcinoma skeletal metastases – Does histologic subtype predict progression?","authors":"Kavin Sundaram ,&nbsp;Joshua M. Lawrenz ,&nbsp;Precious C. Oyem ,&nbsp;Aditya Banerjee ,&nbsp;Shannon Wu ,&nbsp;Paras Shah ,&nbsp;Shireen Parsai ,&nbsp;Chirag Shah ,&nbsp;Nathan W. Mesko ,&nbsp;John Reith ,&nbsp;Lukas M. Nystrom","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2024.100040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This investigation assessed whether the following factors were associated with radiographic local progression in bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC): (1) high-risk histologic features (2) lesional surgery (3) biologically effective dose (BED) of radiation therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>A single-institution database identified all patients who underwent surgery and radiation therapy for bone metastases from RCC to the appendicular skeleton and pelvis from 2006 to 2016. Thirty-six patients underwent radiotherapy for 80 metastases. While all patients had surgical stabilization, 17/36 also had lesional surgery to address the metastatic lesion. Progression of each individual lesion was determined using the application of RECIST criteria to imaging at last follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rate of progressive disease was 8/25 (32%) in the high-risk group versus 5/55 (9%) in the standard-risk group (p ​= ​0.019). The rate of progression among high-risk metastases undergoing lesional surgery was 0/9 versus 8/16 (50%) having non-lesional surgery (p ​= ​0.0218). The rate of progression among standard-risk metastases undergoing lesional surgery was 1/16 (6%) versus 4/39 (10%) with non-lesional surgery (p ​= ​1.00). High-risk histologic features (OR: 10.592, 95% confidence interval: 1.347–83.271, p ​= ​0.025) and as well as a reduction in risk with every additional Gray of BED (OR: 0.902, 95% confidence interval: 0.827–0.984, p ​= ​0.021) were found to predict progressive disease.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma with high-risk histologic features are associated with less favorable response to radiotherapy than those with standard-risk histology. Delivery of a higher BED was associated with lower odds of progression.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000084/pdfft?md5=aea0076e2d0d2be703db1b01c4dfab5a&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X24000084-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This investigation assessed whether the following factors were associated with radiographic local progression in bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC): (1) high-risk histologic features (2) lesional surgery (3) biologically effective dose (BED) of radiation therapy.

Methods and materials

A single-institution database identified all patients who underwent surgery and radiation therapy for bone metastases from RCC to the appendicular skeleton and pelvis from 2006 to 2016. Thirty-six patients underwent radiotherapy for 80 metastases. While all patients had surgical stabilization, 17/36 also had lesional surgery to address the metastatic lesion. Progression of each individual lesion was determined using the application of RECIST criteria to imaging at last follow-up.

Results

The rate of progressive disease was 8/25 (32%) in the high-risk group versus 5/55 (9%) in the standard-risk group (p ​= ​0.019). The rate of progression among high-risk metastases undergoing lesional surgery was 0/9 versus 8/16 (50%) having non-lesional surgery (p ​= ​0.0218). The rate of progression among standard-risk metastases undergoing lesional surgery was 1/16 (6%) versus 4/39 (10%) with non-lesional surgery (p ​= ​1.00). High-risk histologic features (OR: 10.592, 95% confidence interval: 1.347–83.271, p ​= ​0.025) and as well as a reduction in risk with every additional Gray of BED (OR: 0.902, 95% confidence interval: 0.827–0.984, p ​= ​0.021) were found to predict progressive disease.

Conclusions

Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma with high-risk histologic features are associated with less favorable response to radiotherapy than those with standard-risk histology. Delivery of a higher BED was associated with lower odds of progression.

肾细胞癌骨骼转移的放射治疗--组织学亚型能否预测病情发展?
导读:这项研究评估了以下因素是否与肾细胞癌(RCC)骨转移的放射学局部进展有关:(1)高危组织学特征(2)病变手术(3)放疗的生物有效剂量(BED)。方法和材料一个单一机构的数据库确定了2006年至2016年期间所有因RCC骨转移至阑尾骨骼和骨盆而接受手术和放疗的患者。36名患者因80处转移灶接受了放疗。虽然所有患者都接受了手术稳定治疗,但其中17/36的患者还接受了病灶手术来治疗转移病灶。结果高危组中疾病进展率为8/25(32%),而标准风险组为5/55(9%)(P = 0.019)。接受病变手术的高危转移灶中,疾病进展率为0/9,而接受非病变手术的为8/16(50%)(P = 0.0218)。接受病变手术的标准风险转移灶的进展率为1/16(6%),而接受非病变手术的标准风险转移灶的进展率为4/39(10%)(p = 1.00)。高风险组织学特征(OR:10.592,95% 置信区间:1.347-83.271,p = 0.025)和每增加一个 BED 格雷风险降低(OR:0.902,95% 置信区间:0.827-0.984,p = 0.结论与标准风险组织学相比,具有高风险组织学特征的肾细胞癌骨转移与放疗反应较差有关。较高的BED与较低的进展几率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信