Experiences of living kidney donors: A synthesis of unsolicited patient narratives

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Katya Loban , Saly El Wazze , Théa Milland , Lindsay Hales , Anita Slominska , Shaifali Sandal
{"title":"Experiences of living kidney donors: A synthesis of unsolicited patient narratives","authors":"Katya Loban ,&nbsp;Saly El Wazze ,&nbsp;Théa Milland ,&nbsp;Lindsay Hales ,&nbsp;Anita Slominska ,&nbsp;Shaifali Sandal","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the lauded benefits of living kidney donation, there is growing evidence of the challenges that living kidney donors (LKD) encounter in their donation trajectory and gaps in healthcare service provision. However, most of the evidence is derived from research conducted by clinicians or academic investigators. Significantly less attention has been devoted to analyzing unsolicited accounts of LKDs' experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a review and synthesis of published unsolicited first-person narratives of LKDs and aimed to synthesize their experiences and identify care needs. Four electronic databases were searched and 27 LKD narratives were included in our final analysis. Thematic synthesis was used to generate themes inductively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Although the majority of LKDs reported the act of donation to be a fulfilling experience, almost 48% reported encountering challenges in the care that they received. Also, 29% of LKDs reported experiencing an adverse clinical event. Five distinct themes emerged surrounding the donation experience and healthcare needs: 1) Educational needs due to perceived lack of transparency and compensating for knowledge gaps; 2) Respect for donor autonomy due to coercive influences from family or healthcare providers, lack of respect for donor preferences and loopholes in the consent process; 3) Unmet care needs related to poor communication with healthcare providers, coordination issues and inconsistent and inadequate long-term care; 4) Unanticipated outcomes due to economic costs and the emotional burden of donation; and 5) Contributing beyond the donation event by advocating for a balanced view of donation and generating support mechanisms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this synthesis of LKDs narratives, important care gaps and the need to advocate for a balanced perspective on living kidney donation were highlighted. Our review underscores the value of patients' own stories as critical evidence that can inform improvement in healthcare service delivery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 100855"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000387/pdfft?md5=355654ade176fce81810810b337fcaf3&pid=1-s2.0-S0955470X24000387-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the lauded benefits of living kidney donation, there is growing evidence of the challenges that living kidney donors (LKD) encounter in their donation trajectory and gaps in healthcare service provision. However, most of the evidence is derived from research conducted by clinicians or academic investigators. Significantly less attention has been devoted to analyzing unsolicited accounts of LKDs' experiences.

Methods

We conducted a review and synthesis of published unsolicited first-person narratives of LKDs and aimed to synthesize their experiences and identify care needs. Four electronic databases were searched and 27 LKD narratives were included in our final analysis. Thematic synthesis was used to generate themes inductively.

Results

Although the majority of LKDs reported the act of donation to be a fulfilling experience, almost 48% reported encountering challenges in the care that they received. Also, 29% of LKDs reported experiencing an adverse clinical event. Five distinct themes emerged surrounding the donation experience and healthcare needs: 1) Educational needs due to perceived lack of transparency and compensating for knowledge gaps; 2) Respect for donor autonomy due to coercive influences from family or healthcare providers, lack of respect for donor preferences and loopholes in the consent process; 3) Unmet care needs related to poor communication with healthcare providers, coordination issues and inconsistent and inadequate long-term care; 4) Unanticipated outcomes due to economic costs and the emotional burden of donation; and 5) Contributing beyond the donation event by advocating for a balanced view of donation and generating support mechanisms.

Conclusion

In this synthesis of LKDs narratives, important care gaps and the need to advocate for a balanced perspective on living kidney donation were highlighted. Our review underscores the value of patients' own stories as critical evidence that can inform improvement in healthcare service delivery.

活体肾脏捐献者的经历:主动提供的患者叙述综述
导言尽管活体肾脏捐献的益处备受赞誉,但越来越多的证据表明,活体肾脏捐献者(LKD)在捐献过程中遇到了各种挑战,医疗保健服务的提供也存在差距。然而,大多数证据都来自临床医生或学术调查人员的研究。我们对已发表的肾脏捐献者主动提供的第一人称叙述进行了回顾和综合,旨在总结他们的经历并确定护理需求。我们搜索了四个电子数据库,最终分析了 27 篇长者叙述。结果尽管大多数长者称捐献行为是一次充实的经历,但近 48% 的长者称他们在接受护理时遇到了挑战。此外,有 29% 的患者表示曾经历过不良临床事件。围绕捐献经历和医疗保健需求,出现了五个不同的主题:1) 由于认为缺乏透明度和弥补知识差距而产生的教育需求;2) 由于来自家庭或医疗服务提供者的胁迫性影响、缺乏对捐献者偏好的尊重和同意程序中的漏洞而产生的对捐献者自主权的尊重;3) 由于与医疗服务提供者沟通不畅、协调问题以及长期护理不一致和不充分而产生的未满足护理需求;4) 由于经济成本和捐献带来的情感负担而产生的意料之外的结果;以及 5) 通过倡导对捐献的平衡观点和建立支持机制,在捐献事件之外做出贡献。结论 在这份关于活体肾脏捐献者叙述的综述中,强调了重要的护理差距以及倡导活体肾脏捐献平衡观点的必要性。我们的综述强调了患者自己的故事作为重要证据的价值,可为改善医疗服务提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信