No Right to an Honest Living: The Struggles of Boston's Black Workers in the Civil War Era by Jacqueline Jones (review)

Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1353/soh.2024.a925471
Zebulon V. Miletsky
{"title":"No Right to an Honest Living: The Struggles of Boston's Black Workers in the Civil War Era by Jacqueline Jones (review)","authors":"Zebulon V. Miletsky","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a925471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>No Right to an Honest Living: The Struggles of Boston’s Black Workers in the Civil War Era</em> by Jacqueline Jones <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Zebulon V. Miletsky </li> </ul> <em>No Right to an Honest Living: The Struggles of Boston’s Black Workers in the Civil War Era</em>. By Jacqueline Jones. (New York: Basic Books, 2023. Pp. viii, 532. $35.00, ISBN 978-1-5416-1979-1.) <p>In 2015, a study completed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston determined that the median net worth of white households in Boston stood at $247,000, while the median net worth for Black households was only $8.00 (“The Color of Wealth in Boston,” bostonfed.org). In <em>No Right to an Honest Living: The Struggles of Boston’s Black Workers in the Civil War Era</em>, Jacqueline Jones gives us some of the reasons for this extreme economic disparity between white and Black Bostonians. In this magnificently researched work, Jones reconstructs a world that has been largely hidden from historians and scholars, one that has been realized through research prowess and sheer genius in the archives. She provides a more complete window into the work that Black Bostonians did—despite discrimination and prejudice—to advance Boston’s economy.</p> <p><em>No Right to an Honest Living</em> is a strong monograph unconstrained by convention. It is alive with a research-based narrative that paints unforgettable <strong>[End Page 439]</strong> imagery and is bolstered by unimpeachable brick-and-mortar evidence. Jones points out, for example, that the work of Black Bostonians took place within two distinct spheres, which were at the same time mutually reinforcing and antagonistic. These two domains, work in the legitimate economy and work in the so-called illegitimate economy, served as the primary venues for Black Bostonians’ toil during the Civil War. However, these two domains also served as the central tension and contradiction in the face of Boston’s presumed reputation as a place brimming with economic opportunity for African Americans. This inherent paradox is a thread that runs throughout the book, which Jones uses to show that Black Bostonians balanced their duality through creativity, ingenuity, and grit in the face of extreme difficulty.</p> <p>Boston’s story is also important because it contradicted the view of white southerners who believed that African Americans would not be able to function in a free-labor environment. As Jones writes in her now classic <em>Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family from Slavery to the Present</em> (New York, 1985), “The Yankees’ vision of a free labor market, in which individual blacks used their wits to strike a favorable bargain with a prospective employer, struck the former Confederates as a ludicrous idea and an impossible objective” (p. 52). In <em>No Right to an Honest Living</em>, Jones makes the point that even white northerners wondered whether the experiment of free labor would work in their own section. As Jones makes clear, readers tend to conflate Boston’s role as the headquarters of abolitionism with a presumed social and economic acceptance of African Americans. However, it was not mutually exclusive to be an abolitionist and at the same time to be against Black and white social and economic equality. Massachusetts may have been more generous with political rights extended to African American men, but man cannot live from rights alone. As Jones also makes clear, we need to include “race work” as a form of labor that was more often than not the only form of employment available to certain extraordinary Black men in Boston.</p> <p>Jones has made a major contribution to the recent spate of offerings in the re-burgeoning field of Black Boston history—addressing long-held suspicions that without this text have been more difficult to prove, including issues of the income gap and affirmative action. It comes as an absolute affirmation. <em>No Right to an Honest Living</em> is a welcome entry into the discussion, which thus far has been lacking in explaining this phenomenon of joblessness and job scarcity. As we learn from this book, Black Bostonians’ economic woes have a longer history.</p> Zebulon V. Miletsky Stony Brook University Copyright © 2024 The Southern Historical Association ... </p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • No Right to an Honest Living: The Struggles of Boston’s Black Workers in the Civil War Era by Jacqueline Jones
  • Zebulon V. Miletsky
No Right to an Honest Living: The Struggles of Boston’s Black Workers in the Civil War Era. By Jacqueline Jones. (New York: Basic Books, 2023. Pp. viii, 532. $35.00, ISBN 978-1-5416-1979-1.)

In 2015, a study completed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston determined that the median net worth of white households in Boston stood at $247,000, while the median net worth for Black households was only $8.00 (“The Color of Wealth in Boston,” bostonfed.org). In No Right to an Honest Living: The Struggles of Boston’s Black Workers in the Civil War Era, Jacqueline Jones gives us some of the reasons for this extreme economic disparity between white and Black Bostonians. In this magnificently researched work, Jones reconstructs a world that has been largely hidden from historians and scholars, one that has been realized through research prowess and sheer genius in the archives. She provides a more complete window into the work that Black Bostonians did—despite discrimination and prejudice—to advance Boston’s economy.

No Right to an Honest Living is a strong monograph unconstrained by convention. It is alive with a research-based narrative that paints unforgettable [End Page 439] imagery and is bolstered by unimpeachable brick-and-mortar evidence. Jones points out, for example, that the work of Black Bostonians took place within two distinct spheres, which were at the same time mutually reinforcing and antagonistic. These two domains, work in the legitimate economy and work in the so-called illegitimate economy, served as the primary venues for Black Bostonians’ toil during the Civil War. However, these two domains also served as the central tension and contradiction in the face of Boston’s presumed reputation as a place brimming with economic opportunity for African Americans. This inherent paradox is a thread that runs throughout the book, which Jones uses to show that Black Bostonians balanced their duality through creativity, ingenuity, and grit in the face of extreme difficulty.

Boston’s story is also important because it contradicted the view of white southerners who believed that African Americans would not be able to function in a free-labor environment. As Jones writes in her now classic Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family from Slavery to the Present (New York, 1985), “The Yankees’ vision of a free labor market, in which individual blacks used their wits to strike a favorable bargain with a prospective employer, struck the former Confederates as a ludicrous idea and an impossible objective” (p. 52). In No Right to an Honest Living, Jones makes the point that even white northerners wondered whether the experiment of free labor would work in their own section. As Jones makes clear, readers tend to conflate Boston’s role as the headquarters of abolitionism with a presumed social and economic acceptance of African Americans. However, it was not mutually exclusive to be an abolitionist and at the same time to be against Black and white social and economic equality. Massachusetts may have been more generous with political rights extended to African American men, but man cannot live from rights alone. As Jones also makes clear, we need to include “race work” as a form of labor that was more often than not the only form of employment available to certain extraordinary Black men in Boston.

Jones has made a major contribution to the recent spate of offerings in the re-burgeoning field of Black Boston history—addressing long-held suspicions that without this text have been more difficult to prove, including issues of the income gap and affirmative action. It comes as an absolute affirmation. No Right to an Honest Living is a welcome entry into the discussion, which thus far has been lacking in explaining this phenomenon of joblessness and job scarcity. As we learn from this book, Black Bostonians’ economic woes have a longer history.

Zebulon V. Miletsky Stony Brook University Copyright © 2024 The Southern Historical Association ...

分享
查看原文
无权过诚实的生活:内战时期波士顿黑人工人的斗争》,杰奎琳-琼斯著(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 无权过诚实的生活:内战时期波士顿黑人工人的斗争》,杰奎琳-琼斯著,Zebulon V. Miletsky 译 没有诚实生活的权利:内战时期波士顿黑人工人的斗争》。杰奎琳-琼斯著。(35.00 美元,ISBN 978-1-5416-1979-1)。2015 年,波士顿联邦储备银行完成的一项研究表明,波士顿白人家庭的净资产中位数为 24.7 万美元,而黑人家庭的净资产中位数仅为 8.00 美元("波士顿财富的颜色",bostonfed.org)。在《无权过诚实的生活:杰奎琳-琼斯(Jacqueline Jones)在《无权过上诚实的生活:内战时期波士顿黑人工人的奋斗》一书中,为我们揭示了波士顿白人和黑人之间经济差距悬殊的一些原因。在这部研究成果丰硕的作品中,琼斯重构了一个在很大程度上被历史学家和学者所掩盖的世界,一个通过高超的研究能力和纯粹的档案天才而实现的世界。她提供了一个更完整的窗口,让人们了解波士顿黑人不顾歧视和偏见,为推动波士顿经济发展所做的工作。无权过诚实的生活》是一部不受传统束缚的强有力的专著。它以研究为基础,生动地叙述了令人难忘的 [第 439 页完] 想象,并以无可辩驳的实物证据为支撑。例如,琼斯指出,波士顿黑人的工作发生在两个截然不同的领域,这两个领域既相互促进,又相互对立。这两个领域,即合法经济中的工作和所谓非法经济中的工作,是内战期间波士顿黑人劳作的主要场所。然而,这两个领域也是波士顿被假定为非裔美国人充满经济机会的地方所面临的主要矛盾和冲突。这种内在的矛盾贯穿全书,琼斯用它来说明波士顿黑人在面对极端困难时通过创造力、智慧和勇气平衡了他们的双重性。波士顿的故事之所以重要,还因为它与南方白人的观点相悖,南方白人认为非裔美国人无法在自由劳动环境中发挥作用。正如琼斯在其经典著作《爱的劳动,悲伤的劳动》(Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow:黑人妇女、工作和家庭:从奴隶制到现在》(纽约,1985 年)一书中写道,"北方佬对自由劳动力市场的憧憬,即黑人凭借自己的智慧与未来的雇主达成有利的交易,让前南方人觉得这是一个可笑的想法,也是一个不可能实现的目标"(第 52 页)。在《无权过诚实的生活》一书中,琼斯指出,即使是北方白人也怀疑自由劳动的试验在他们自己的地区是否可行。正如琼斯明确指出的那样,读者往往将波士顿作为废奴主义总部的角色与假定社会和经济接受非裔美国人混为一谈。然而,既是废奴主义者,同时又反对黑人和白人在社会和经济上的平等,这两者之间并不相互排斥。马萨诸塞州在赋予非裔美国人政治权利方面可能更为慷慨,但人不能仅靠权利生存。正如琼斯所明确指出的,我们需要将 "种族工作 "作为一种劳动形式,它往往是波士顿某些非凡的黑人男子唯一的就业形式。琼斯为波士顿黑人历史这一新兴领域最近的一系列成果做出了重大贡献--解决了长期以来的疑虑,而如果没有这本著作,这些疑虑就很难得到证实,包括收入差距和平权法案等问题。这是一个绝对的肯定。没有诚实谋生的权利》是一个值得欢迎的讨论切入点,迄今为止,人们一直缺乏对失业和工作稀缺现象的解释。从本书中我们可以了解到,波士顿黑人的经济困境由来已久。Zebulon V. Miletsky 石溪大学 Copyright © 2024 The Southern Historical Association ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信