Recommendation endpoints and safety of an online self-triage for depression symptoms

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nathaniel E Miller, Frederick North, Elizabeth N Curry, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer L Pecina
{"title":"Recommendation endpoints and safety of an online self-triage for depression symptoms","authors":"Nathaniel E Miller, Frederick North, Elizabeth N Curry, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer L Pecina","doi":"10.1177/1357633x241245161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionOnline symptom checkers are a way to address patient concerns and potentially offload a burdened healthcare system. However, safety outcomes of self-triage are unknown, so we reviewed triage recommendations and outcomes of our institution's depression symptom checker.MethodsWe examined endpoint recommendations and follow-up encounters seven days afterward during 2 December 2021 to 13 December 2022. Patients with an emergency department visit or hospitalization within seven days of self-triaging had a manual review of the electronic health record to determine if the visit was related to depression, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt. Charts were reviewed for deaths within seven days of self-triage.ResultsThere were 287 unique encounters from 263 unique patients. In 86.1% (247/287), the endpoint was an instruction to call nurse triage; in 3.1% of encounters (9/287), instruction was to seek emergency care. Only 20.2% (58/287) followed the recommendations given. Of the 229 patients that did not follow the endpoint recommendations, 121 (52.8%) had some type of follow-up within seven days. Nearly 11% (31/287) were triaged to endpoints not requiring urgent contact and 9.1% (26/287) to an endpoint that would not need any healthcare team input. No patients died in the study period.ConclusionsMost patients did not follow the recommendations for follow-up care although ultimately most patients did receive care within seven days. Self-triage appears to appropriately sort patients with depressed mood to emergency care. On-line self-triaging tools for depression have the potential to safely offload some work from clinic personnel.","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x241245161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionOnline symptom checkers are a way to address patient concerns and potentially offload a burdened healthcare system. However, safety outcomes of self-triage are unknown, so we reviewed triage recommendations and outcomes of our institution's depression symptom checker.MethodsWe examined endpoint recommendations and follow-up encounters seven days afterward during 2 December 2021 to 13 December 2022. Patients with an emergency department visit or hospitalization within seven days of self-triaging had a manual review of the electronic health record to determine if the visit was related to depression, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt. Charts were reviewed for deaths within seven days of self-triage.ResultsThere were 287 unique encounters from 263 unique patients. In 86.1% (247/287), the endpoint was an instruction to call nurse triage; in 3.1% of encounters (9/287), instruction was to seek emergency care. Only 20.2% (58/287) followed the recommendations given. Of the 229 patients that did not follow the endpoint recommendations, 121 (52.8%) had some type of follow-up within seven days. Nearly 11% (31/287) were triaged to endpoints not requiring urgent contact and 9.1% (26/287) to an endpoint that would not need any healthcare team input. No patients died in the study period.ConclusionsMost patients did not follow the recommendations for follow-up care although ultimately most patients did receive care within seven days. Self-triage appears to appropriately sort patients with depressed mood to emergency care. On-line self-triaging tools for depression have the potential to safely offload some work from clinic personnel.
抑郁症状在线自我诊断的推荐终点和安全性
导言在线症状检查器是解决患者疑虑的一种方法,有可能减轻医疗保健系统的负担。我们对 2021 年 12 月 2 日至 2022 年 12 月 13 日期间的终点建议和七天后的随访情况进行了检查。在自我检测后七天内到急诊科就诊或住院的患者都需要手动查看电子健康记录,以确定就诊是否与抑郁、自杀意念或自杀未遂有关。对自我分流后七天内的死亡病历进行了审查。在 86.1%(247/287)的就诊者中,就诊终点是指示呼叫分诊护士;在 3.1%(9/287)的就诊者中,就诊终点是指示寻求急诊护理。只有 20.2%(58/287)的患者遵循了所给出的建议。在 229 名未遵循终点建议的患者中,有 121 人(52.8%)在七天内进行了某种形式的随访。近 11%(31/287)的患者被分流到不需要紧急联系的终点,9.1%(26/287)的患者被分流到不需要任何医疗团队投入的终点。结论虽然大多数患者最终都在七天内接受了治疗,但他们并没有按照建议进行后续治疗。自我分诊似乎可以适当地将情绪低落的患者分流到急诊治疗。抑郁症在线自我分诊工具有可能安全地分担诊所人员的一些工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信