Annual Report of the Secretary-Treasurer

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Stephen Berry
{"title":"Annual Report of the Secretary-Treasurer","authors":"Stephen Berry","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a925440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Annual Report of the Secretary-Treasurer <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Stephen Berry (bio) </li> </ul> <p>T<small>he</small> S<small>outhern</small> H<small>istorical</small> A<small>ssociation is now in its ninetieth</small> year. As we begin turning our attention to our looming centennial, I think it appropriate to take a broader-than-usual look at the health and vitality of our organization.</p> <p>Once understood as a meeting and a journal, the SHA is now an organization that serves its members 365 days of the year (or 366 as the case may be). Our virtual programming includes our Junior Scholars Fellows program, the Second Book Writers Workshop, the new Classic Texts in Southern History book discussion, the SHA Coffee, Tea, and Confab, and the History Across the Generations interview, in which a junior scholar interviews a senior one. As always, our presence as a full voting board member of the Executive Council of the National Coalition for History ensures that our voice is heard on matters of public policy.</p> <p>In addition to “what the SHA does,” “who the SHA is” is undergoing important shifts. Our membership software focuses on those in arrears, allowing the Membership Committee to concentrate on growing our representation among new populations: museum professionals, folks at HBCUs, National Park Service personnel, K–12 teachers, and so on. The innovations and adaptations go deeper, however: our newest committees—the Professional Development Committee, the Committee on Teaching, the Communications Committee, and the Graduate Student Council; our new SHA Public Square, which creates a stage and a spotlight in our exhibit hall for the local history work being done on the ground by our allies in the cities we visit; and our new Prison History Book Initiative. Along with the continued growth and vitality of our affiliate organizations (European History Section, Latin American and Caribbean Section, Southern Conference on British Studies, Society of Civil War Historians, Southern Association for Women Historians, and a potential Native South section), these new developments have the combined effect of returning us to our roots as <strong>[End Page 391]</strong> an organization that absolutely, yes, represents all historians <em>of</em> the South but also represents all history educators <em>in</em> the South.</p> <p>Walking our exhibit hall last year in Charlotte, I heard one message again and again: “We’re back!” The exhibit hall was alive with laughter. People were pitching books and talking history (and football). The panels, roundtables, and plenaries—including those designed by our Committees on Minorities and on Women, Gender, and Sexuality—were well attended and generative; the Public Square was a complete hit; and the vibe was exhilarating. Other highlights included the opening and closing plenaries—devoted to the history of HBCUs and to North Carolina as a political bellwether, respectively—and Joseph Reidy’s presidential address, which focused on the radical positions of southern conservatives and the conservative positions of southern radicals. Particular thanks are due to the Program Committee co-chairs, Nancy Bercaw and Betsy Herbin-Triant, for organizing such a vibrant meeting. Certainly, our numbers told the tale: we were back in full force, with attendance at well over a thousand strong.</p> <p>I say all this as we head into what is likely to be one of the most intellectually rewarding conferences we’ve ever held. For the first time, we will meet concurrently with the Western History Association, a notion that has been championed by many but by none more indefatigably than past president Catherine Clinton. More than a marriage of convenience, this meeting will be a marriage of ideas. If you have not already done so, read the brilliant call-for-papers generated by Angela Murphy and her outstanding Program Committee. We are living through an incredible SXSW turn in the historiography as the Global South and the Continental South become dominant facets of the revitalization of southern history itself. While each organization will run its own full program, the SHA and the WHA will co-host several plenaries, panels, and, most important, an exhibit space that will be roughly double what we’re used to. This will not be a meeting to miss.</p> <p>There will be other changes this year. The SHA has always been accustomed to a leisurely pace, with concurrent sessions at 9:30 <small>a</small>.<small>m</small>. and...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":45484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925440","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Annual Report of the Secretary-Treasurer
  • Stephen Berry (bio)

The Southern Historical Association is now in its ninetieth year. As we begin turning our attention to our looming centennial, I think it appropriate to take a broader-than-usual look at the health and vitality of our organization.

Once understood as a meeting and a journal, the SHA is now an organization that serves its members 365 days of the year (or 366 as the case may be). Our virtual programming includes our Junior Scholars Fellows program, the Second Book Writers Workshop, the new Classic Texts in Southern History book discussion, the SHA Coffee, Tea, and Confab, and the History Across the Generations interview, in which a junior scholar interviews a senior one. As always, our presence as a full voting board member of the Executive Council of the National Coalition for History ensures that our voice is heard on matters of public policy.

In addition to “what the SHA does,” “who the SHA is” is undergoing important shifts. Our membership software focuses on those in arrears, allowing the Membership Committee to concentrate on growing our representation among new populations: museum professionals, folks at HBCUs, National Park Service personnel, K–12 teachers, and so on. The innovations and adaptations go deeper, however: our newest committees—the Professional Development Committee, the Committee on Teaching, the Communications Committee, and the Graduate Student Council; our new SHA Public Square, which creates a stage and a spotlight in our exhibit hall for the local history work being done on the ground by our allies in the cities we visit; and our new Prison History Book Initiative. Along with the continued growth and vitality of our affiliate organizations (European History Section, Latin American and Caribbean Section, Southern Conference on British Studies, Society of Civil War Historians, Southern Association for Women Historians, and a potential Native South section), these new developments have the combined effect of returning us to our roots as [End Page 391] an organization that absolutely, yes, represents all historians of the South but also represents all history educators in the South.

Walking our exhibit hall last year in Charlotte, I heard one message again and again: “We’re back!” The exhibit hall was alive with laughter. People were pitching books and talking history (and football). The panels, roundtables, and plenaries—including those designed by our Committees on Minorities and on Women, Gender, and Sexuality—were well attended and generative; the Public Square was a complete hit; and the vibe was exhilarating. Other highlights included the opening and closing plenaries—devoted to the history of HBCUs and to North Carolina as a political bellwether, respectively—and Joseph Reidy’s presidential address, which focused on the radical positions of southern conservatives and the conservative positions of southern radicals. Particular thanks are due to the Program Committee co-chairs, Nancy Bercaw and Betsy Herbin-Triant, for organizing such a vibrant meeting. Certainly, our numbers told the tale: we were back in full force, with attendance at well over a thousand strong.

I say all this as we head into what is likely to be one of the most intellectually rewarding conferences we’ve ever held. For the first time, we will meet concurrently with the Western History Association, a notion that has been championed by many but by none more indefatigably than past president Catherine Clinton. More than a marriage of convenience, this meeting will be a marriage of ideas. If you have not already done so, read the brilliant call-for-papers generated by Angela Murphy and her outstanding Program Committee. We are living through an incredible SXSW turn in the historiography as the Global South and the Continental South become dominant facets of the revitalization of southern history itself. While each organization will run its own full program, the SHA and the WHA will co-host several plenaries, panels, and, most important, an exhibit space that will be roughly double what we’re used to. This will not be a meeting to miss.

There will be other changes this year. The SHA has always been accustomed to a leisurely pace, with concurrent sessions at 9:30 a.m. and...

秘书--财务长年度报告
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 秘书兼财务主管斯蒂芬-贝里(Stephen Berry)的年度报告 南方历史协会现已进入第 90 个年头。在我们开始关注即将到来的百年纪念之际,我认为应该对本组织的健康和活力进行比以往更广泛的审视。曾经被理解为会议和期刊的社会科学及人文科学协会,现在是一个全年 365 天(或 366 天,视情况而定)为会员服务的组织。我们的虚拟项目包括青年学者研究员计划、第二本书作家工作坊、新的《南方历史经典文本》新书讨论、SHA 咖啡、茶会和 Confab,以及历史跨代访谈(由一位青年学者对一位资深学者进行访谈)。一如既往,我们作为全美历史联盟执行委员会具有投票权的董事会成员,确保了我们在公共政策问题上的发言权。除了 "上海史学会做什么","上海史学会是谁 "也在发生着重要的变化。我们的会员软件重点关注那些拖欠会费的人,使会员委员会能够集中精力增加我们在新人群中的代表性:博物馆专业人士、哈佛商学院(HBCUs)的人、国家公园服务人员、K-12 教师等。然而,我们的创新和调整更为深入:我们最新成立的委员会--专业发展委员会、教学委员会、交流委员会和研究生理事会;我们新成立的 SHA 公共广场,在我们的展厅为我们的盟友在我们访问的城市实地开展的地方历史工作创造了一个舞台和聚光灯;以及我们新的监狱历史图书计划。随着我们的附属组织(欧洲历史分会、拉丁美洲和加勒比分会、南方英国研究会议、内战历史学家学会、南方妇女历史学家协会,以及潜在的南方本土分会)的不断发展和活力,这些新的发展产生了共同的效果,使我们回归到我们的根基上,成为一个绝对代表南方所有历史学家,同时也代表南方所有历史教育工作者的组织。去年在夏洛特的展厅里,我一再听到一个信息:"我们回来了!":"我们回来了!"展厅里充满了欢声笑语。人们推销书籍,谈论历史(和足球)。小组讨论、圆桌会议和全体会议--包括由我们的少数群体委员会和妇女、性别和性问题委员会设计的活动--出席人数众多,并产生了巨大的影响;公共广场大受欢迎;气氛令人振奋。其他亮点还包括开幕式和闭幕式全体会议--分别讨论了哈佛商学院的历史和作为政治风向标的北卡罗来纳州--以及约瑟夫-雷迪的主席致辞,其重点是南方保守派的激进立场和南方激进派的保守立场。特别要感谢项目委员会联合主席南希-贝尔考(Nancy Bercaw)和贝茜-赫宾-特里安特(Betsy Herbin-Triant)组织了这样一次充满活力的会议。当然,我们的数字也说明了这一点:我们又回来了,出席人数远远超过了一千人。我说这一切的时候,我们即将迎来的很可能是我们有史以来智力收获最大的一次会议。我们将首次与西部历史协会同时举行会议,这一想法得到了许多人的支持,但没有人比前任主席凯瑟琳-克林顿(Catherine Clinton)更不遗余力了。这次会议将不仅仅是一次方便的联姻,更是一次思想的联姻。如果您还没有阅读安吉拉-墨菲(Angela Murphy)和她出色的项目委员会征集的精彩论文,请阅读这些论文。当全球南方和大陆南方成为振兴南方历史本身的主导方面时,我们正经历着历史学上令人难以置信的 "SXSW "转向。虽然每个组织都将实施自己的完整计划,但社会科学及人文科学学会和世界历史学会将共同主办若干次全体会议和专题讨论会,最重要的是,展览空间将是我们以往展览空间的两倍。这将是一次不容错过的会议。今年还会有其他变化。SHA 一直以来都习惯于悠闲的节奏,上午 9:30 同时举行会议,而下午 3:00 则是会议的最后一天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信