Knowledge-Augmented Mutation-Based Bug Localization for Hardware Design Code

IF 1.5 3区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Jiang Wu, Zhuo Zhang, Deheng Yang, Jianjun Xu, Jiayu He, Xiaoguang Mao
{"title":"Knowledge-Augmented Mutation-Based Bug Localization for Hardware Design Code","authors":"Jiang Wu, Zhuo Zhang, Deheng Yang, Jianjun Xu, Jiayu He, Xiaoguang Mao","doi":"10.1145/3660526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Verification of hardware design code is crucial for the quality assurance of hardware products. Being an indispensable part of verification, localizing bugs in the hardware design code is significant for hardware development but is often regarded as a notoriously difficult and time-consuming task. Thus, automated bug localization techniques that could assist manual debugging have attracted much attention in the hardware community. However, existing approaches are hampered by the challenge of achieving both demanding bug localization accuracy and facile automation in a single method. Simulation-based methods are fully automated but have limited localization accuracy, slice-based techniques can only give an approximate range of the presence of bugs, and spectrum-based techniques can also only yield a reference value for the likelihood that a statement is buggy. Furthermore, formula-based bug localization techniques suffer from the complexity of combinatorial explosion for automated application in industrial large-scale hardware designs. In this work, we propose Kummel, a <underline>K</underline>nowledge-a<underline>u</underline>g<underline>m</underline>ented <underline>m</underline>utation-bas<underline>e</underline>d bug loca<underline>l</underline>ization for hardware design code to address these limitations. Kummel achieves the unity of precise bug localization and full automation by utilizing the knowledge augmentation through mutation analysis. To evaluate the effectiveness of Kummel, we conduct large-scale experiments on 76 versions of 17 hardware projects by seven state-of-the-art bug localization techniques. The experimental results clearly show that Kummel is statistically more effective than baselines, e.g., our approach can improve the seven original methods by 64.48% on average under the RImp metric. It brings fresh insights of hardware bug localization to the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":50920,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3660526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Verification of hardware design code is crucial for the quality assurance of hardware products. Being an indispensable part of verification, localizing bugs in the hardware design code is significant for hardware development but is often regarded as a notoriously difficult and time-consuming task. Thus, automated bug localization techniques that could assist manual debugging have attracted much attention in the hardware community. However, existing approaches are hampered by the challenge of achieving both demanding bug localization accuracy and facile automation in a single method. Simulation-based methods are fully automated but have limited localization accuracy, slice-based techniques can only give an approximate range of the presence of bugs, and spectrum-based techniques can also only yield a reference value for the likelihood that a statement is buggy. Furthermore, formula-based bug localization techniques suffer from the complexity of combinatorial explosion for automated application in industrial large-scale hardware designs. In this work, we propose Kummel, a Knowledge-augmented mutation-based bug localization for hardware design code to address these limitations. Kummel achieves the unity of precise bug localization and full automation by utilizing the knowledge augmentation through mutation analysis. To evaluate the effectiveness of Kummel, we conduct large-scale experiments on 76 versions of 17 hardware projects by seven state-of-the-art bug localization techniques. The experimental results clearly show that Kummel is statistically more effective than baselines, e.g., our approach can improve the seven original methods by 64.48% on average under the RImp metric. It brings fresh insights of hardware bug localization to the community.

基于知识增强突变的硬件设计代码错误定位
硬件设计代码的验证对于保证硬件产品的质量至关重要。作为验证不可或缺的一部分,定位硬件设计代码中的错误对硬件开发意义重大,但通常被认为是一项众所周知的艰巨而耗时的任务。因此,能够辅助人工调试的自动错误定位技术在硬件界引起了广泛关注。然而,现有的方法在实现苛刻的错误定位精度和简便的自动化方面都面临着挑战。基于仿真的方法是完全自动化的,但定位精度有限;基于切片的技术只能给出错误存在的大致范围;而基于频谱的技术也只能为语句出现错误的可能性提供一个参考值。此外,基于公式的错误定位技术还存在组合爆炸的复杂性,难以在工业化大规模硬件设计中自动应用。在这项工作中,我们提出了基于知识增强突变的硬件设计代码错误定位技术 Kummel,以解决这些局限性。Kummel 通过突变分析利用知识增强,实现了精确错误定位和完全自动化的统一。为了评估 Kummel 的有效性,我们使用七种最先进的错误定位技术对 17 个硬件项目的 76 个版本进行了大规模实验。实验结果清楚地表明,Kummel 在统计学上比基线方法更有效,例如,在 RImp 指标下,我们的方法能将七种原始方法平均提高 64.48%。它为业界带来了硬件错误定位的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO) focuses on hardware, software, and system research spanning the fields of computer architecture and code optimization. Articles that appear in TACO will either present new techniques and concepts or report on experiences and experiments with actual systems. Insights useful to architects, hardware or software developers, designers, builders, and users will be emphasized.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信